An eco-friendly evaluation for locating wheat processing plants: an integrated approach based on interval type-2 fuzzy AHP and COPRAS

被引:10
作者
Cetinkaya, Cihan [1 ]
Ozkan, Baris [2 ]
Ozceylan, Eren [3 ]
Haffar, Samer [4 ]
机构
[1] Adana Alparslan Turkes Sci & Technol Univ, Dept Management Informat Syst, TR-01200 Adana, Turkey
[2] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-55139 Samsun, Turkey
[3] Gaziantep Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-27310 Gaziantep, Turkey
[4] Gaziantep Univ, Inst Sci, TR-27300 Gaziantep, Turkey
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
Analytic hierarchy process; COPRAS; Evaluation; Interval type-2 fuzzy sets; Wheat plant; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; HYBRID MCDM MODEL; SELECTION; SITE; MANAGEMENT; VIKOR;
D O I
10.1007/s00500-022-06922-2
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Site selection for organizations is a complex and unstructured problem that must be analyzed carefully and properly since a localization error could drive to bankruptcy. This problem has been discussed widely and effectively using multi-criteria decision-making methods in a manufacturing context, but it has been little studied in the agricultural industry. The aim of this study is to proposing a methodological approach to evaluate the fifty states in the United States (US) in terms of wheat processing plant locations. To do so, a literature review is searched to determine the ten sub-criteria under financial, environmental, and spatial dimensions. To overcome the uncertainty of experts' judgment in criteria prioritization, interval type-2 fuzzy (IT2F)-analytic hierarchy process is used. The method of complex proportional assessment of alternatives is used to obtain the final rank of states. The results and verification of the methodology are carried out throughout a sensitivity analysis of the weights. The results of sensitivity analysis indicated that when financial aspects are focused upon, California is the best alternative, followed by Texas and Oklahoma. In addition, from the environmental and spatial perspectives, Vermont and California are the best choices, respectively. The findings of this study can provide useful information to wheat plant decision-makers and serve as a reference for US policy.
引用
收藏
页码:4081 / 4102
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Evaluation of the second-hand LNG tanker vessels using fuzzy MCGDM approach based on the Interval type-2 fuzzy ARAS (IT2F-ARAS) technique [J].
Gorcun, Omer Faruk ;
Kundu, Pradip ;
Kucukonder, Hande ;
Senthil, S. .
OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2024, 303
[32]   Evaluating sustainability of urban mobility of Asian cities: An integrated approach of interval type-2 fuzzy best-worst method and MULTIMOORA [J].
Yucesan, Melih ;
Ozkan, Baris ;
Mete, Suleyman ;
Gul, Muhammet ;
Ozceylan, Eren .
ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2024, 127
[33]   An integrated group FWA-ELECTRE III approach based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets for solving the MCDM problems using limit distance mean [J].
Mohamadghasemi, A. ;
Hadi-Vencheh, A. ;
Lotfi, F. Hosseinzadeh ;
Khalilzadeh, M. .
COMPLEX & INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2020, 6 (02) :355-389
[34]   A new interval type-2 fuzzy approach for multi-scenario project cash flow assessment based on alternative queuing method and dependency structure matrix with a case study [J].
Mirnezami, Seyed Ali ;
Mousavi, Seyed Meysam ;
Mohagheghi, Vahid .
ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2020, 95 (95)
[35]   Determining project characteristics and critical path by a new approach based on modified NWRT method and risk assessment under an interval type-2 fuzzy environment [J].
Dorfeshan, Y. ;
Mousavi, S. M. ;
Vahdani, B. ;
Siadat, A. .
SCIENTIA IRANICA, 2019, 26 (04) :2579-2600
[36]   Kano-based mapping of innovation strategies for renewable energy alternatives using hybrid interval type-2 fuzzy decision-making approach [J].
Li, Xiangrong ;
Zhu, Shaoying ;
Yuksel, Serhat ;
Dincer, Hasan ;
Ubay, Gozde Gulseven .
ENERGY, 2020, 211
[37]   A new interval type-2 fuzzy approach for analyzing and monitoring the performance of megaprojects based on earned value analysis (with a case study) [J].
Eshghi, Amin ;
Mousavi, S. Meysam ;
Mohagheghi, Vahid .
NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2019, 31 (09) :5109-5133
[38]   A weighted centroids approach based trapezoidal interval type-2 fuzzy TOPSIS method for evaluating agricultural risk management tools [J].
Le, Thi Hong Phuong ;
Chu, Ta-Chung .
SOFT COMPUTING, 2023, 27 (22) :17153-17173
[39]   A variable weight-based interval type-2 fuzzy rough comprehensive evaluation method for curtain grouting efficiency assessment [J].
Yushan Zhu ;
Xiaoling Wang ;
Wenlong Chen ;
Hui Guo ;
Dong Li .
Neural Computing and Applications, 2022, 34 :7851-7879
[40]   Canonical triangular interval type-2 fuzzy linguistic distribution assessment EDAS approach with its application to production supplier evaluation and ranking [J].
Tian, Yongting ;
Song, Shouxu ;
Bao, Siriguleng ;
Zhou, Dan ;
Wei, Chen .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2024, 154