Choosing a doctor: an exploratory study of factors influencing patients' choice of a primary care doctor

被引:99
作者
Bornstein, BH
Marcus, D
Cassidy, W
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Psychol, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[2] New Mexico State Univ, Dept Psychol, Las Cruces, NM 88003 USA
[3] Louisiana State Univ, Med Ctr, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
关键词
consumer behaviour; decision making; primary care;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2753.2000.00256.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
We assessed the relative importance healthcare consumers attach to various factors in choosing a primary care doctor (PCD) in a cross-sectional, in-person survey. Three survey locations were used: doctors' offices, a public shopping area, and meetings of a women's organization. A total of 636 community residents, varying across major demographic categories, participated. Participants completed a 23-item survey, designed to assess which factors consumers perceive as most relevant in choosing a PCD. Participants perceived professionally relevant factors (e.g. whether the doctor is board certified, office appearance) and management practices (e.g. time to get an appointment, evening and weekend hours) as more important than the doctor's personal characteristics (race, age, gender, etc.). Participants' own characteristics bore little relationship to the perceived importance of doctor characteristics. Factors patients perceive as most important to their choice of a PCD are also those that have the greatest effect on the quality of healthcare they will receive. However, they do not always have access to this information. A better understanding of the factors that influence people's choice of a PCD can contribute to efforts to provide them with the resources to make well-informed decisions in selecting among healthcare options.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 262
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1980, Cognitive processes in choice and decision behavior
  • [2] HINDSIGHT BIAS AMONG PHYSICIANS WEIGHING THE LIKELIHOOD OF DIAGNOSES
    ARKES, HR
    SAVILLE, PD
    WORTMANN, RL
    HARKNESS, AR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 66 (02) : 252 - 254
  • [3] OMISSION BIAS AND PERTUSSIS VACCINATION
    ASCH, DA
    BARON, J
    HERSHEY, JC
    KUNREUTHER, H
    MESZAROS, J
    RITOV, I
    SPRANCA, M
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1994, 14 (02) : 118 - 123
  • [4] BILLINGHURST B, 1993, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V43, P336
  • [5] PERVASIVENESS OF FRAMING EFFECTS AMONG PHYSICIANS AND MEDICAL-STUDENTS
    CHRISTENSEN, C
    HECKERLING, P
    MACKESYAMITI, ME
    BERNSTEIN, LM
    ELSTEIN, AS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 1995, 8 (03) : 169 - 180
  • [6] HINDSIGHT BIAS - AN IMPEDIMENT TO ACCURATE PROBABILITY ESTIMATION IN CLINICOPATHOLOGIC CONFERENCES
    DAWSON, NV
    ARKES, HR
    SICILIANO, C
    BLINKHORN, R
    LAKSHMANAN, M
    PETRELLI, M
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1988, 8 (04) : 259 - 264
  • [7] SYSTEMATIC-ERRORS IN MEDICAL DECISION-MAKING - JUDGMENT LIMITATIONS
    DAWSON, NV
    ARKES, HR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1987, 2 (03) : 183 - 187
  • [8] DETMER DE, 1978, J MED EDUC, V53, P682
  • [9] BEHAVIORAL DECISION-THEORY - PROCESSES OF JUDGMENT AND CHOICE
    EINHORN, HJ
    HOGARTH, RM
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 32 : 53 - 88
  • [10] Elstein A.S., 1978, MED PROBLEM SOLVING, DOI DOI 10.4159/HARVARD.9780674189089