Development and application of a model for robust, cost-effective investment in natural capital and ecosystem services

被引:25
作者
Bryan, Brett A. [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO Sustainable Ecosyst, Urrbrae, SA 5064, Australia
关键词
Portfolio analysis; Planning; Preference programming; Compositional analysis; Prioritization; Conservation; RESOURCE-ALLOCATION; CONSERVATION; MANAGEMENT; BIODIVERSITY; ECONOMICS; VALUES; RETURN;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2010.04.022
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Identifying good investments in environmental management is complex as several prioritization strategies may be used and significant uncertainty often surrounds cost, benefits, and agency budgets. In this paper I developed a model for robust portfolio selection based on preference programming to support cost-effective environmental investment decisions under uncertainty and applied it to the South Australian Murray-Darling Basin. Benefits and costs of 46 investment alternatives (called targets) for managing natural capital and ecosystem services were quantified and the associated uncertainty estimated. Thirty-six investment portfolios were selected using mathematical programming under four investment prioritization strategies (cost-effectiveness (E-max), cost-effectiveness including a suite of pre-committed (or core) costs (E-max*), cost-only (C-rank), and benefit-only (B-rank)), three decision rules (pessimistic, most likely, and optimistic), and three budget scenarios (minimum, most likely, maximum). Compared to the optimally performing investment strategy E-max, the E-max* and C-rank strategies only slightly reduced portfolio performance and altered portfolio composition. However, the B-rank strategy reduced performance by half and radically changed composition. Uncertainty in costs, benefits, and available budgets also strongly influenced portfolio performance and composition. I conclude that in this case study the consideration of uncertainty was at least as important as investment strategy in effective environmental decision-making. Targets whose selection was less sensitive to uncertainty were identified as more robust investments. The results have informed the allocation of AU$69 million in the study area and the techniques are readily adaptable to similar conservation and environmental investment decisions in other areas at a variety of scales. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1737 / 1750
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Valuing Supporting Soil Ecosystem Services in Agriculture: A Natural Capital Approach
    Brady, Mark V.
    Hedlund, Katarina
    Cong, Rong-Gang
    Hemerik, Lia
    Hotes, Stefan
    Machado, Stephen
    Mattsson, Lennart
    Schulz, Elke
    Thomsen, Ingrid K.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2015, 107 (05) : 1809 - 1821
  • [42] Is the development of players in football a cost-effective process for clubs?
    Martin Barrero, Alberto
    RETOS-NUEVAS TENDENCIAS EN EDUCACION FISICA DEPORTE Y RECREACION, 2022, (45): : 1069 - 1075
  • [43] Biophysical and economic assessment of four ecosystem services for natural capital accounting in Italy
    Capriolo, A.
    Boschetto, R. G.
    Mascolo, R. A.
    Balbi, S.
    Villa, F.
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2020, 46
  • [44] Towards a standardized protocol to assess natural capital and ecosystem services in solar parks
    Carvalho, Fabio
    Treasure, Lucy
    Robinson, Samuel J. B.
    Blaydes, Hollie
    Exley, Giles
    Hayes, Rachel
    Howell, Belinda
    Keith, Aidan
    Montag, Hannah
    Parker, Guy
    Sharp, Stuart P.
    Witten, Cameron
    Armstrong, Alona
    ECOLOGICAL SOLUTIONS AND EVIDENCE, 2023, 4 (01):
  • [45] A visualization platform to analyze contextual links between natural capital and ecosystem services
    Linney, G. N.
    Henrys, P. A.
    Blackburn, G. A.
    Maskell, L. C.
    Harrison, P. A.
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2020, 45
  • [46] A model-based approach for designing cost-effective compensation payments for conservation of endangered species in real landscapes
    Drechsler, Martin
    Waetzold, Frank
    Johst, Karin
    Bergmann, Holger
    Settele, Josef
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2007, 140 (1-2) : 174 - 186
  • [47] Cost-Effective and Robust Service Provisioning in Multi-Access Edge Computing
    Xiang, Zhengzhe
    Zheng, Yuhang
    Wang, Dongjing
    Taheri, Javid
    Zheng, Zengwei
    Guo, Minyi
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS, 2024, 35 (10) : 1765 - 1779
  • [48] Using natural capital and ecosystem services to facilitate participatory environmental decision making: Results from a systematic map
    Hinson, Caitlin
    O'Keeffe, Jimmy
    Mijic, Ana
    Bryden, John
    Van Grootveld, Jessica
    Collins, Alexandra M.
    PEOPLE AND NATURE, 2022, 4 (03) : 652 - 668
  • [49] Quantifying and Exploring Strategic Regional Priorities for Managing Natural Capital and Ecosystem Services Given Multiple Stakeholder Perspectives
    Brett A. Bryan
    Agnès Grandgirard
    John R. Ward
    Ecosystems, 2010, 13 : 539 - 555
  • [50] How natural capital delivers ecosystem services: A typology derived from a systematic review
    Smith, A. C.
    Harrison, P. A.
    Soba, M. Perez
    Archaux, F.
    Blicharska, M.
    Egoh, B. N.
    Eros, T.
    Domenech, N. Fabrega
    Gyorgy, A. I.
    Haines-Young, R.
    Li, S.
    Lommelen, E.
    Meiresonne, L.
    Ayala, L. Miguel
    Mononen, L.
    Simpson, G.
    Stange, E.
    Turkelboom, F.
    Uiterwijk, M.
    Veerkamp, C. J.
    de Echeverria, V. Wyllie
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2017, 26 : 111 - 126