Development and application of a model for robust, cost-effective investment in natural capital and ecosystem services

被引:25
作者
Bryan, Brett A. [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO Sustainable Ecosyst, Urrbrae, SA 5064, Australia
关键词
Portfolio analysis; Planning; Preference programming; Compositional analysis; Prioritization; Conservation; RESOURCE-ALLOCATION; CONSERVATION; MANAGEMENT; BIODIVERSITY; ECONOMICS; VALUES; RETURN;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2010.04.022
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Identifying good investments in environmental management is complex as several prioritization strategies may be used and significant uncertainty often surrounds cost, benefits, and agency budgets. In this paper I developed a model for robust portfolio selection based on preference programming to support cost-effective environmental investment decisions under uncertainty and applied it to the South Australian Murray-Darling Basin. Benefits and costs of 46 investment alternatives (called targets) for managing natural capital and ecosystem services were quantified and the associated uncertainty estimated. Thirty-six investment portfolios were selected using mathematical programming under four investment prioritization strategies (cost-effectiveness (E-max), cost-effectiveness including a suite of pre-committed (or core) costs (E-max*), cost-only (C-rank), and benefit-only (B-rank)), three decision rules (pessimistic, most likely, and optimistic), and three budget scenarios (minimum, most likely, maximum). Compared to the optimally performing investment strategy E-max, the E-max* and C-rank strategies only slightly reduced portfolio performance and altered portfolio composition. However, the B-rank strategy reduced performance by half and radically changed composition. Uncertainty in costs, benefits, and available budgets also strongly influenced portfolio performance and composition. I conclude that in this case study the consideration of uncertainty was at least as important as investment strategy in effective environmental decision-making. Targets whose selection was less sensitive to uncertainty were identified as more robust investments. The results have informed the allocation of AU$69 million in the study area and the techniques are readily adaptable to similar conservation and environmental investment decisions in other areas at a variety of scales. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1737 / 1750
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF AN ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT APPROACH FOR PROTECTED NATURAL AREAS
    LAJEUNESSE, D
    DOMON, G
    DRAPEAU, P
    COGLIASTRO, A
    BOUCHARD, A
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1995, 19 (04) : 481 - 495
  • [22] Cost-effective provision of environmental services: the role of relaxing market constraints
    Groom, Ben
    Palmer, Charles
    ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2010, 15 : 219 - 240
  • [23] On the comparative use of social media data and survey data in prioritizing ecosystem services for cost-effective governance
    Wang, Zhifang
    Fu, Hongpeng
    Jian, Yuqing
    Qureshi, Salman
    Jie, Hua
    Wang, Lu
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2022, 56
  • [24] A cost-effective optimization model of safety investment allocation for risk reduction of domino effects
    Guo, Xiaoxue
    Ding, Long
    Ji, Jie
    Cozzani, Valerio
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2022, 225
  • [25] Helping Markets Get Prices Right: Natural Capital, Ecosystem Services, and Sustainability
    Adamowicz, W. L.
    Olewiler, Nancy
    CANADIAN PUBLIC POLICY-ANALYSE DE POLITIQUES, 2016, 42 : S32 - S38
  • [26] Application of Ecosystem Services in Natural Resource Management Decision Making
    Moore, David W.
    Booth, Pieter
    Alix, Anne
    Apitz, Sabine E.
    Forrow, David
    Huber-Sannwald, Elisabeth
    Jayasundara, Nishad
    INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 13 (01) : 74 - 84
  • [27] Coastal Cultural Ecosystem Services: A Bridge between the Natural Ecosystem and Social Ecosystem for Sustainable Development
    Zhao, Yuqing
    Han, Zenglin
    Zhang, Changren
    Wang, Yuqiao
    Zhong, Jingqiu
    Gao, Mengfan
    LAND, 2024, 13 (09)
  • [28] Simulation of natural capital and ecosystem services in a watershed in Northern Japan focusing on the future underuse of nature: by linking forest landscape model and social scenarios
    Haga, Chihiro
    Inoue, Takahiro
    Hotta, Wataru
    Shibata, Rei
    Hashimoto, Shizuka
    Kurokawa, Hiroko
    Machimura, Takashi
    Matsui, Takanori
    Morimoto, Junko
    Shibata, Hideaki
    SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2019, 14 (01) : 89 - 106
  • [29] Exploring cost-effective measure portfolios for ecosystem services optimization under large-scale vegetation restoration
    Li, Ting
    Lue, Yihe
    Ma, Liyang
    Li, Pengfei
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 325
  • [30] Boundary of ecosystem services: Guiding future development and application of the ecosystem service concepts
    Chen, Haojie
    Sloggy, Matthew R.
    Dhiaulhaq, Ahmad
    Escobedo, Francisco J.
    Rasheed, A. Rifaee
    Sanchez, Jose J.
    Yang, Weishan
    Yu, Fang
    Meng, Ziqi
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 344