Development and application of a model for robust, cost-effective investment in natural capital and ecosystem services

被引:25
作者
Bryan, Brett A. [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO Sustainable Ecosyst, Urrbrae, SA 5064, Australia
关键词
Portfolio analysis; Planning; Preference programming; Compositional analysis; Prioritization; Conservation; RESOURCE-ALLOCATION; CONSERVATION; MANAGEMENT; BIODIVERSITY; ECONOMICS; VALUES; RETURN;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2010.04.022
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Identifying good investments in environmental management is complex as several prioritization strategies may be used and significant uncertainty often surrounds cost, benefits, and agency budgets. In this paper I developed a model for robust portfolio selection based on preference programming to support cost-effective environmental investment decisions under uncertainty and applied it to the South Australian Murray-Darling Basin. Benefits and costs of 46 investment alternatives (called targets) for managing natural capital and ecosystem services were quantified and the associated uncertainty estimated. Thirty-six investment portfolios were selected using mathematical programming under four investment prioritization strategies (cost-effectiveness (E-max), cost-effectiveness including a suite of pre-committed (or core) costs (E-max*), cost-only (C-rank), and benefit-only (B-rank)), three decision rules (pessimistic, most likely, and optimistic), and three budget scenarios (minimum, most likely, maximum). Compared to the optimally performing investment strategy E-max, the E-max* and C-rank strategies only slightly reduced portfolio performance and altered portfolio composition. However, the B-rank strategy reduced performance by half and radically changed composition. Uncertainty in costs, benefits, and available budgets also strongly influenced portfolio performance and composition. I conclude that in this case study the consideration of uncertainty was at least as important as investment strategy in effective environmental decision-making. Targets whose selection was less sensitive to uncertainty were identified as more robust investments. The results have informed the allocation of AU$69 million in the study area and the techniques are readily adaptable to similar conservation and environmental investment decisions in other areas at a variety of scales. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1737 / 1750
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Selecting cost-effective areas for restoration of ecosystem services
    Adame, M. F.
    Hermoso, V.
    Perhans, K.
    Lovelock, C. E.
    Herrera-Silveira, J. A.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2015, 29 (02) : 493 - 502
  • [2] Marine natural capital and ecosystem services: An environmental accounting model
    Buonocore, Elvira
    Donnarumma, Luigia
    Appolloni, Luca
    Miccio, Antonino
    Russo, Giovanni F.
    Franzese, Pier Paolo
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2020, 424
  • [3] Managing Natural Capital Stocks for the Provision of Ecosystem Services
    Maseyk, Fleur J. F.
    Mackay, Alec D.
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    Dominati, Estelle J.
    Buckley, Yvonne M.
    CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2017, 10 (02): : 211 - 220
  • [4] Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services
    Raymond, Christopher M.
    Bryan, Brett A.
    MacDonald, Darla Hatton
    Cast, Andrea
    Strathearn, Sarah
    Grandgirard, Agnes
    Kalivas, Tina
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (05) : 1301 - 1315
  • [5] Identifying cost-effective hotspots for restoring natural capital and enhancing landscape multifunctionality
    Crossman, Neville D.
    Bryan, Brett A.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (03) : 654 - 668
  • [6] Natural capital and ecosystem services, developing an appropriate soils framework as a basis for valuation
    Robinson, D. A.
    Hockley, N.
    Cooper, D. M.
    Emmett, B. A.
    Keith, A. M.
    Lebron, I.
    Reynolds, B.
    Tipping, E.
    Tye, A. M.
    Watts, C. W.
    Whalley, W. R.
    Black, H. I. J.
    Warren, G. P.
    Robinson, J. S.
    SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2013, 57 : 1023 - 1033
  • [7] Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: From promise to practice
    Guerry, Anne D.
    Polasky, Stephen
    Lubchenco, Jane
    Chaplin-Kramer, Rebecca
    Daily, Gretchen C.
    Griffin, Robert
    Ruckelshaus, Mary
    Bateman, Ian J.
    Duraiappah, Anantha
    Elmqvist, Thomas
    Feldman, Marcus W.
    Folke, Carl
    Hoekstra, Jon
    Kareiva, Peter M.
    Keeler, Bonnie L.
    Li, Shuzhuo
    McKenzie, Emily
    Ouyang, Zhiyun
    Reyers, Belinda
    Ricketts, Taylor H.
    Rockstrom, Johan
    Tallis, Heather
    Vira, Bhaskar
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2015, 112 (24) : 7348 - 7355
  • [8] Folklife, Heritage, and the Environment: A Critique of Natural Capital, Ecosystem Services, and Settler Ecology
    Titon, Jeff Todd
    JOURNAL OF AMERICAN FOLKLORE, 2024, 137 (543)
  • [10] Cost-effective mitigation strategies to reduce bycatch threats to cetaceans identified using return-on-investment analysis
    Tulloch, Vivitskaia
    Grech, Alana
    Jonsen, Ian
    Pirotta, Vanessa
    Harcourt, Rob
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2020, 34 (01) : 168 - 179