Predicting methane emissions from paddy rice soils under biochar and nitrogen addition using DNDC model

被引:17
作者
Shaukat, Muhammad [1 ,2 ]
Muhammad, Sher [2 ]
Maas, Ellen D. V. L. [3 ]
Khaliq, Tasneem [4 ]
Ahmad, Ashfaq [4 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Carbon Management & Sequestrat Ctr, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Allama Iqbal Open Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Agr Sci, Islamabad, Pakistan
[3] Iowa State Univ, 2017 Agron Hall, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[4] Univ Agr Faisalabad, Dept Agron, Faisalabad, Pakistan
关键词
Methane; Paddy rice; DNDC model; Parameter-adjustment calibration; Biochar; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; OXIDE EMISSIONS; N2O EMISSIONS; MANAGEMENT; STRAW; TILLAGE; FIELDS; CARBON; FERTILIZERS; INTENSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.109896
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Methane (CH4) is a second largest contributor of global warming after carbon dioxide (CO2), and it is crucial to understand how management practices affect CH4 emissions. Among field crops, paddy rice alone has accounted for about 10-12% of the total CH4 emission in 2010. The process-based DeNitrification and DeComposition (DNDC) model can be applied to quantify greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from agricultural soils. Capturing both the daily time-scale and cumulative growing season CH4 fluxes by DNDC may help to devise appealing mitigation approaches for better rice management. In this study, DNDC was calibrated with a parameter-adjustment approach under two treatments: 140 kg N ha(-1) without biochar and 140 kg N ha(-1) with 2% bio -char. Simulation results show that the model predicted the daily CH4 fluxes in good agreement with measure-ments under both treatments. Next, DNDC was validated with the adjusted parameters against the remaining biochar and N treatments, and the model performed well in prediction of CH4 fluxes as indicated by several statistical indexes: RMSE ranged from 6.74 to 7.62 g CH4 ha(-1)d(-1), the D-index varied between 0.92 to 0.98, and MPD and nRMSE were at 10.94-17.43% and 17.54-24.52%, respectively. In terms of cumulative growing season CH4 efflux, DNDC under-simulated all treatments except the control. Further DNDC predicted above-ground dry weights and volumetric water contents in good agreement with the measurements. Moreover, model poorly predicted soil temperature, pH, and soil moisture content. The value of the D-index varied from 0.12 to 0.38 for both soil temperature and pH. Subsequently, DNDC successfully identified the significant impact of biochar on CH4 emission, and model error was strongly correlated with pH of soils with no biochar amendments. In conclusion, the DNDC model can capture the daily time-scale as well as annual-scale CH4 fluxes, though DNDC must be validated by intensive measurements of additional soil variables, including dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and microbial composition under different biochar types.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Scenario analysis of fertilizer management practices for N2O mitigation from corn systems in Canada [J].
Abalos, Diego ;
Smith, Ward N. ;
Grant, Brian B. ;
Drury, Craig F. ;
MacKell, Sarah ;
Wagner-Riddle, Claudia .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 573 :356-365
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, WMO STAT STAT GLOB C
[3]   Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from rice paddy fields as affected by nitrogen fertilisers and water management [J].
Cai, ZC ;
Xing, GX ;
Yan, XY ;
Xu, H ;
Tsuruta, H ;
Yagi, K ;
Minami, K .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1997, 196 (01) :7-14
[4]   MODELING METHANE EMISSIONS FROM RICE PADDIES [J].
CAO, MK ;
DENT, JB ;
HEAL, OW .
GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 1995, 9 (02) :183-195
[5]   Properties of a clay soil from 1.5 to 3.5 years after biochar application and the impact on rice yield [J].
Carvalho, M. T. M. ;
Madari, B. E. ;
Bastiaans, L. ;
van Oort, P. N. ;
Leal, W. G. O. ;
Heinemann, A. B. ;
da Silva, M. A. S. ;
Maia, A. H. N. ;
Parsons, D. ;
Meinke, H. .
GEODERMA, 2016, 276 :7-18
[6]   STATE-OF-THE-ART SOIL [J].
Cernansky, Rachel .
NATURE, 2015, 517 (7534) :258-260
[7]   How does climate variability influence nitrogen loss in temperate agroecosystems under contrasting management systems? [J].
Congreves, K. A. ;
Dutta, B. ;
Grant, B. B. ;
Smith, W. N. ;
Desjardins, R. L. ;
Wagner-Riddle, C. .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 227 :33-41
[8]   Control of microbial methane production in wetland rice fields [J].
Conrad, R .
NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 2002, 64 (1-2) :59-69
[9]   Assessing biogeochemical effects and best management practice for a wheat-maize cropping system using the DNDC model [J].
Cui, F. ;
Zheng, X. ;
Liu, C. ;
Wang, K. ;
Zhou, Z. ;
Deng, J. .
BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2014, 11 (01) :91-107
[10]   Magnitude and biophysical regulators of methane emission and consumption in the Australian agricultural, forest, and submerged landscapes: a review [J].
Dalal, R. C. ;
Allen, D. E. ;
Livesley, S. J. ;
Richards, G. .
PLANT AND SOIL, 2008, 309 (1-2) :43-76