Short communication: Comparison of the GreenFeed system with the sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique for measuring enteric methane emissions from dairy cows

被引:21
作者
Hristov, A. N. [1 ]
Oh, J. [1 ]
Giallongo, F. [1 ]
Frederick, T. [1 ]
Harper, M. T. [1 ]
Weeks, H. [1 ]
Branco, A. F. [2 ]
Price, W. J. [3 ]
Moate, P. J. [4 ]
Deighton, M. H. [4 ]
Williams, S. R. O. [4 ]
Kindermann, M. [5 ]
Duval, S. [6 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Univ Estadual Maringa, Dept Zootecnia, BR-87020900 Maringa, Parana, Brazil
[3] Univ Idaho, Coll Agr & Life Sci, Stat Programs, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
[4] Ellinbank Ctr, Dept Econ Dev Jobs Transport & Resources, Div Agr Res, Ellinbank, Vic 3821, Australia
[5] Anim Nutr & Hlth, DSM Nutr Prod, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland
[6] Res Ctr Anim Nutr & Hlth, IIDSM Nutr Prod France, F-68305 St Louis, France
关键词
methane; GreenFeed; sulfur hexafluoride; dairy cow; RESPIRATION CHAMBERS; CATTLE;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2016-10897
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to compare 2 commonly used techniques for measuring methane emissions from ruminant animals: die GreenFeed (GF) system and the sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) technique. The study was part of a larger experiment in which a methane inhibitor, 3-nitrooxypropanol, fed at 4 application rates (0, 40, 60, and 80 mg/kg of feed dry matter) decreased enteric methane emission by an average of 30% (measured by both GF and SF6) in a 12-wk experiment with 48 lactating Holstein cows fed a total mixed ration. The larger experiment used a randomized block design and was conducted in 2 phases (February to May, phase 1, and June to August, phase 2), with 2 sets of 24 cows in each phase. Using both GF and SF6 techniques, methane emission data, were collected simultaneously during experimental wk 2, 6, and 12 (phase 1) and 2, 9, and 12 (phase 2), which corresponded to a total of 6 sampling periods. During each sampling period, 8 spot samples of gas emissions (staggered over a 3-d period) were collected from each cow using CF, as well as 3 x collections using the SF6 technique. Methane emission data, were averaged per cow for the statistical analysis. The mean methane emission was 373 (standard deviation = 96.3) and 405 (standard deviation 156) g/cow per day for GF and SF6, respectively. Coefficients of variation for the 2 methods were 25.8 and 38.6%, respectively; correlation and concordance between the 2 methods were 0,40 and 0.34, respectively. The difference in methane emission between the 2 methods (SF6 GF) within treatment was from 46 to 144 and 24 to 27 g/d for phases 1 and 2, respectively. In the conditions of this experiment, the SF6 technique produced larger variability in methane emissions than the GF method. The overall difference between the 2 methods was on average about 8%, hut was not consistent over time, likely influenced by barn ventilation and background methane and SF6 concentrations.
引用
收藏
页码:5461 / 5465
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Berndt A., 2014, Guidelines for use of sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer technique to measure enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Pages, P166
[2]   Estimating daily methane production in individual cattle with irregular feed intake patterns from short-term methane emission measurements [J].
Cottle, D. J. ;
Velazco, J. ;
Hegarty, R. S. ;
Mayer, D. G. .
ANIMAL, 2015, 9 (12) :1949-1957
[3]   A modified sulphur hexafluoride tracer technique enables accurate determination of enteric methane emissions from ruminants [J].
Deighton, Matthew H. ;
Williams, S. Richard O. ;
Hannah, Murray C. ;
Eckard, Richard J. ;
Boland, Tommy M. ;
Wales, William J. ;
Moate, Peter J. .
ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 197 :47-63
[4]   Short communication: Use of a portable, automated, open-circuit gas quantification system and the sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique for measuring enteric methane emissions in Holstein cows fed ad libitum or restricted [J].
Dorich, C. D. ;
Varner, R. K. ;
Pereira, A. B. D. ;
Martineau, R. ;
Soder, K. J. ;
Brito, A. F. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2015, 98 (04) :2676-2681
[5]   Methane emissions from cattle: Estimates from short-term measurements using a Green Feed system compared with measurements obtained using respiration chambers or sulphur hexafluoride tracer [J].
Hammond, K. J. ;
Humphries, D. J. ;
Crompton, L. A. ;
Green, C. ;
Reynolds, C. K. .
ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 203 :41-52
[6]  
Hammond K. J., 2016, ANIM FEED SCI UNPUB
[7]   The Use of an Automated System (GreenFeed) to Monitor Enteric Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Ruminant Animals [J].
Hristov, Alexander N. ;
Oh, Joonpyo ;
Giallongo, Fabio ;
Frederick, Tyler ;
Weeks, Holley ;
Zimmerman, Patrick R. ;
Harper, Michael T. ;
Hristova, Rada A. ;
Zimmerman, R. Scott ;
Branco, Antonio F. .
JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2015, (103)
[8]   An inhibitor persistently decreased enteric methane emission from dairy cows with no negative effect on milk production [J].
Hristov, Alexander N. ;
Oh, Joonpyo ;
Giallongo, Fabio ;
Frederick, Tyler W. ;
Harper, Michael T. ;
Weeks, Holley L. ;
Branco, Antonio F. ;
Moate, Peter J. ;
Deighton, Matthew H. ;
Williams, S. Richard O. ;
Kindermann, Maik ;
Duval, Stephane .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2015, 112 (34) :10663-10668
[9]  
Huhtanen P., 2013, Adv. Anim. Biosci, V4, P588
[10]   MEASUREMENT OF METHANE EMISSIONS FROM RUMINANT LIVESTOCK USING A SF6 TRACER TECHNIQUE [J].
JOHNSON, K ;
HUYLER, M ;
WESTBERG, H ;
LAMB, B ;
ZIMMERMAN, P .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1994, 28 (02) :359-362