Missing the point about the Learning and Skills Council, a comment on Coffield

被引:1
作者
Ainley, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Greenwich, Sch Postcompulsory Educ & Training, London SE18 6PF, England
关键词
D O I
10.1080/026809300750001711
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In JEP 15 (2), Frank Coffield welcomed the Learning to Succeed White Paper now passing into legislation as the Learning and Skills Act for implementation in April 2001 as `radical, structural reform' but argued that the government is `failing to recognize the potential of lifelong learning as a major lever on such change'. This misses the point of the new legislation on two grounds. One, not all post-16 learning is included within this provision for `life-long learning' since higher education is specifically excluded. Two, the far-reaching structural reforms provide a template for the future administration of all non-higher education in which, elected local educational authorities is finally subordinated to the new local Learning and Skills Councils intermediate between schools, colleges and training agents and the National Learning and Skills Council. Far from a new enlightenment, this is an instance of the New Leviathan predicted by Glennerster et al. in 1991.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 588
页数:4
相关论文
共 4 条
[1]  
BAILEY B, 2000, VOCATIONAL ED TRAINI
[2]  
*DEP ED EMPL, 2000, LEARN SUCC POST 16 F
[3]   A NEW ERA FOR SOCIAL-POLICY - A NEW ENLIGHTENMENT OR A NEW LEVIATHAN [J].
GLENNERSTER, H ;
POWER, A ;
TRAVERS, T .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL POLICY, 1991, 20 :389-414
[4]  
KINGSTON P, 2000, GUARDIAN 0229