A self-adaptive method for the assessment of dynamic measurement uncertainty

被引:8
作者
Wang, Jun [1 ]
Deng, Huaxia [2 ]
Wu, Yimin [1 ]
Ma, Mengchao [1 ]
Zhong, Xiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Hefei Univ Technol, 193 Tunxi Rd, Hefei 230009, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Sci & Technol China, 96 Jinzhai Rd, Hefei 230009, Anhui, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Self-adaptive; Bayesian linear regression model; Time-varying auto-regression model; Dynamic measurement uncertainty; EMPIRICAL MODE DECOMPOSITION; GREY BOOTSTRAP METHOD; SIGNALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111116
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Measurement uncertainty is as important as measurement in metrology and industry. The GUM and its supplements provide a widely accepted framework for evaluating measurement uncertainty; but don't provide a reasonable assessment method for some special circumstances, especially for dynamic measurement. Several emerging methodologies with different mathematical approaches are used for evaluating the dynamic uncertainty in a specific application, such as knowing the characteristics of data. To expand the applicability, a self-adaptive method is proposed. This method evaluates measurement uncertainty by analyzing the compositions of dynamic data, regardless of linearity, stationarity, or stochasticity. Information entropy on spectra combined with EDM algorithms is presented to divide dynamic data into deterministic and stochastic components; and then a Bayesian model and a time-varying auto-regression model are used to analyze decomposed components, respectively. Synthetic noisy signals and experimental data from a double-rotor table are utilized to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Order estimation and discrimination between stationary and time-varying (TVAR) autoregressive models [J].
Abramovich, Yuri I. ;
Spencer, Nicholas K. ;
Turley, Michael D. E. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2007, 55 (06) :2861-2876
[2]   NEW LOOK AT STATISTICAL-MODEL IDENTIFICATION [J].
AKAIKE, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (06) :716-723
[3]  
BIPM IEC IFCC ILAC OIML., 2008, 101 BIPM IEC IFCC I, V60
[4]  
Bishop C. M., 2006, PATTERN RECOGN, V4, P738, DOI [10.5555/1162264, DOI 10.18637/JSS.V017.B05]
[5]   Changing Dynamics: Time-Varying Autoregressive Models Using Generalized Additive Modeling [J].
Bringmann, Laura F. ;
Hamaker, Ellen L. ;
Vigo, Daniel E. ;
Aubert, Andre ;
Borsboom, Denny ;
Tuerlinckx, Francis .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2017, 22 (03) :409-425
[6]  
Chen XH, 2008, KEY ENG MATER, V381-382, P583, DOI 10.4028/0-87849-382-4.583
[7]   Grey bootstrap method for data validation and dynamic uncertainty estimation of self-validating multifunctional sensors [J].
Chen, Yinsheng ;
Jiang, Shouda ;
Yang, Jingli ;
Song, Kai ;
Wang, Qi .
CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2015, 146 :63-76
[8]   Informative Bayesian Type A uncertainty evaluation, especially applicable to a small number of observations [J].
Cox, M. ;
Shirono, K. .
METROLOGIA, 2017, 54 (05) :642-652
[9]   Guidance on Bayesian uncertainty evaluation for a class of GUM measurement models [J].
Demeyer, S. ;
Fischer, N. ;
Elster, C. .
METROLOGIA, 2021, 58 (01)
[10]   Measurement uncertainty models [J].
Dieck, RH .
ISA TRANSACTIONS, 1997, 36 (01) :29-35