Left ventricular free wall perforation by a right ventricular pacemaker lead: a case report

被引:7
作者
Satomi, Natsuko [1 ]
Enta, Kenji [1 ]
Otsuka, Masato [1 ]
Ishii, Yasuhiro [1 ]
Asano, Ryota [2 ]
Sawa, Shigeharu [2 ]
机构
[1] Ogikubo Hosp, Cardiovasc Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Suginami Ku, 3-1-24 Imagawa, Tokyo 1670035, Japan
[2] Ogikubo Hosp, Cardiovasc Ctr, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Suginami Ku, 3-1-24 Imagawa, Tokyo 1670035, Japan
关键词
Case report; Pacemaker; Complication; Lead perforation; Left ventricular perforation; Lead extraction;
D O I
10.1093/ehjcr/ytab125
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Lead perforation is one of the major complications of pacemaker implantation, but cases of right ventricular (RV) lead perforation through the septum and left ventricle are rarely reported. We described a rare case of left ventricular (LV) free wall perforation by an RV lead and the management of this complication. Case summary An 84-year-old man was admitted with a dual-chamber pacemaker due to pacing failure caused by an RV lead fracture. New lead implantation was performed on the next day, but pacing failure occurred again on the second postoperative day (POD). We found the lead perforation on the fluoroscopy during temporary pacemaker insertion. Computed tomography scan and transthoracic echocardiogram showed that the added lead perforated through both the septum and LV free wall. A new lead was inserted on the fourth POD, and an off-pump open chest surgery for extraction of the penetrating lead was performed uneventfully on the 20th POD. Discussion We considered that some features of the lead (SelectSecure 3830-69, Medtronic) may be related to this complication, as the lead was very thin, had a non-retractable bare screw and was inserted with a dedicated delivery catheter. We have to be careful when performing implantation of this kind of lead to avoid such a rare complication.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] Carlson MD, 2008, PACE, V31, P13, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00943.x
  • [2] Multi-center clinical experience with a lumenless, catheter-delivered, bipolar, permanent pacemaker lead: Implant safety and electrical performance
    Gammage, Michael D.
    Lieberman, Randy A.
    Yee, Raymond
    Manolis, Antonis S.
    Compton, Steven J.
    Khazen, Cesar
    Schaaf, Katie
    Oleson, Kimberly A.
    Crossley, George H.
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 29 (08): : 858 - 865
  • [3] Iribarne Alexander, 2018, HeartRhythm Case Rep, V4, P397, DOI 10.1016/j.hrcr.2018.05.004
  • [4] Delayed lead perforation: A disturbing trend
    Khan, MN
    Joseph, G
    Khaykin, Y
    Ziada, KM
    Wilkoff, BL
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 28 (03): : 251 - 253
  • [5] Subacute Right Ventricle Perforation by Pacemaker Lead Presenting with Left Hemothorax and Shock
    Nichols, Julianne
    Berger, Natalie
    Joseph, Praveen
    Datta, Debapriya
    [J]. CASE REPORTS IN CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 2015
  • [6] Left bundle branch pacing is the best approach to physiological pacing
    Padala, Santosh K.
    Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.
    [J]. HEART RHYTHM O2, 2020, 1 (01): : 59 - 67
  • [7] Clinical, Anatomical, and Technical Risk Factors for Postoperative Pacemaker or Defibrillator Lead Perforation with Particular Focus on Myocardial Thickness
    Schwerg, Marius
    Stockburger, Martin
    Schulze, Christoph
    Bondke, Hansjuergen
    Poller, Wolfram C.
    Lembcke, Alexander
    Melzer, Christoph
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 37 (10): : 1291 - 1296