Discrepancy Between Local and Central Pathological Review of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens

被引:23
作者
Kuroiwa, Kentaro [1 ]
Shiraishi, Taizo [5 ]
Ogawa, Osamu [2 ]
Usami, Michiyuki [3 ]
Hirao, Yoshihiko [4 ]
Naito, Seiji [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyushu Univ, Dept Urol, Grad Sch Med Sci, Higashi Ku, Fukuoka 8128582, Japan
[2] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Med, Kyoto, Japan
[3] Osaka Med Ctr Canc & Cardiovasc Dis, Osaka, Japan
[4] Nara Med Univ, Kashihara, Nara 634, Japan
[5] Mie Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Pathol Oncol, Tsu, Mie 514, Japan
关键词
pathology; prostatic neoplasms; prostatectomy; PROSTATIC-CARCINOMA; NEEDLE-BIOPSY; POSTOPERATIVE NOMOGRAM; GLEASON SCORE; MARGIN STATUS; CANCER; RADIOTHERAPY; RECURRENCE; DISEASE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2009.11.024
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Pathological assessment of radical prostatectomy specimens has not been uniform among pathologists. We investigated interobserver variability of radical prostatectomy specimen reviews between local and central pathologists. Materials and Methods: We collated data from 50 institutions on 2,015 patients with cT1c-3 prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1997 and 2005. All radical prostatectomy specimens were retrospectively reevaluated by a central uropathologist. Gleason score, extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, lymph node involvement, positive surgical margin, year of diagnosis and pathology volume were recorded. Results: The exact concordance rate of Gleason score between local and central review was 54.8%, and under grading and over grading rates at local review were 25.9% and 19.2%, respectively. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was 0.61 for local and central radical prostatectomy Gleason score. The exact concordance rate of Gleason score 8-10 at local review was significantly lower than that of Gleason score 5-6, 3 + 4 and 4 + 3 at local review (p = 0.011, <0.001 and 0.006). Exact concordance rates between local and central review for extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, lymph node involvement and positive surgical margin were 82.5%, 97.6%, 99.6% and 87.5%, respectively. High volume institutions and recently diagnosed cohorts showed significantly higher exact concordance rates between local and central review for radical prostatectomy Gleason score and other pathological features (all p <0.001). Conclusions: High volume institutions and recent series show higher concordance between local and central review of radical prostatectomy pathology. However, concordance for high grade Gleason score, extracapsular extension and surgical margin status remains poor. Radical prostatectomy specimens should be reevaluated in a multi-institutional study for more accurate pathological data.
引用
收藏
页码:952 / 957
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] THE PROSTATIC CAPSULE - DOES IT EXIST - ITS IMPORTANCE IN THE STAGING AND TREATMENT OF PROSTATIC-CARCINOMA
    AYALA, AG
    RO, JY
    BABAIAN, R
    TRONCOSO, P
    GRIGNON, DJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1989, 13 (01) : 21 - 27
  • [2] Postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy:: a randomised controlled trial (EORTC trial 22911)
    Bolla, M
    van Poppel, H
    Collette, L
    van Cangh, P
    Vekemans, K
    Da Pozzo, L
    de Reijke, TM
    Verbaeys, A
    Bosset, JF
    van Velthoven, R
    Maréchal, JM
    Scalliet, P
    Haustermans, K
    Piérart, M
    [J]. LANCET, 2005, 366 (9485) : 572 - 578
  • [3] Long-term outcome after radical prostatectomy for patients with lymph node positive prostate cancer in the prostate specific antigen era
    Boorjian, Stephen A.
    Thompson, R. Houston
    Siddiqui, Sameer
    Bagniewski, Stephanie
    Bergstralh, Erik J.
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Frank, Igor
    Blute, Michael L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 178 (03) : 864 - 870
  • [4] The role of the pathologist in the evaluation of radical prostatectomy specimens
    Ekici, S
    Ayhan, A
    Erkan, I
    Bakkaloglu, M
    Özen, H
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2003, 37 (05): : 387 - 391
  • [5] The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma
    Epstein, JI
    Allsbrook, WC
    Amin, MB
    Egevad, LL
    Bastacky, S
    Beltrán, AL
    Berner, A
    Billis, A
    Boccon-Gibod, L
    Cheng, L
    Civantos, F
    Cohen, C
    Cohen, MB
    Datta, M
    Davis, C
    Delahunt, B
    Delprado, W
    Eble, JN
    Foster, CS
    Furusato, M
    Gaudin, PB
    Grignon, DJ
    Humphrey, PA
    Iczkowski, KA
    Jones, EC
    Lucia, S
    McCue, PA
    Nazeer, T
    Oliva, E
    Pan, CC
    Pizov, G
    Reuter, V
    Samaratunga, H
    Sebo, T
    Sesterhenn, I
    Shevchuk, M
    Srigley, JR
    Suzigan, S
    Takahashi, H
    Tamboli, P
    Tan, PH
    Têtu, B
    Tickoo, S
    Tomaszewski, JE
    Troncoso, P
    Tsuzuki, T
    True, LD
    van der Kwast, T
    Wheeler, TM
    Wojno, KJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2005, 29 (09) : 1228 - 1242
  • [6] Interobserver variability between expert: Urologic pathologists for extraprostatic extension and surgical margin status in radical prostatectomy specimens
    Evans, Andrew J.
    Henry, Pauline C.
    Van der Kwast, Theodorus H.
    Tkachuk, Douglas C.
    Watson, Kemp
    Lockwood, Gina A.
    Fleshner, Neil E.
    Cheung, Carol
    Belanger, Eric C.
    Amin, Mahul B.
    Boccon-Gibod, Liliane
    Bostwick, David G.
    Egevad, Lars
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Grignon, David J.
    Jones, Edward C.
    Montironi, Rodolfo
    Moussa, Madeleine
    Sweet, Joan M.
    Trpkov, Kiril
    Wheeler, Thomas M.
    Srigley, John R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2008, 32 (10) : 1503 - 1512
  • [7] A contemporary study correlating prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy gleason score
    Fine, Samson W.
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04) : 1335 - 1338
  • [8] The significance of modified Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens
    Helpap, Burkhard
    Egevad, Lars
    [J]. VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2006, 449 (06) : 622 - 627
  • [9] Postoperative nomogram for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
    Kattan, MW
    Wheeler, TM
    Scardino, PT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (05) : 1499 - 1507
  • [10] King CR, 2000, INT J CANCER, V90, P305, DOI 10.1002/1097-0215(20001220)90:6<305::AID-IJC1>3.0.CO