Same-gender citations do not indicate a substantial gender homophily bias

被引:9
作者
Tekles, Alexander [1 ,2 ]
Auspurg, Katrin [1 ]
Bornmann, Lutz [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich LMU, Dept Sociol, Munich, Germany
[2] Max Planck Gesell, Sci Policy & Strategy Dept, Adm Headquarters, Munich, Germany
关键词
WOMEN; SCIENCE; COMMUNICATION; NORMALIZATION; PATTERNS; IMPACT; STEM; GAP;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0274810
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Can the male citation advantage (more citations for papers written by male than female scientists) be explained by gender homophily bias, i.e., the preference of scientists to cite other scientists of the same gender category? Previous studies report much evidence that this is the case. However, the observed gender homophily bias may be overestimated by overlooking structural aspects such as the gender composition of research topics in which scientists specialize. When controlling for research topics at a high level of granularity, there is only little evidence for a gender homophily bias in citation decisions. Our study points out the importance of controlling structural aspects such as gendered specialization in research topics when investigating gender bias in science.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Gender differences in scientific collaborations: Women are more egalitarian than men [J].
Araujo, Eduardo B. ;
Araujo, Nuno A. M. ;
Moreira, Andre A. ;
Herrmann, Hans J. ;
Andrade, Jose A. S., Jr. .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (05)
[2]  
Boekhout H, 2021, PRO INT CONF SCI INF, P145
[3]   Interrater reliability and convergent validity of F1000Prime peer review [J].
Bornmann, Lutz .
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 66 (12) :2415-2426
[4]   The Normalization of Citation Counts Based on Classification Systems [J].
Bornmann, Lutz ;
Marx, Werner ;
Barth, Andreas .
PUBLICATIONS, 2013, 1 (02) :78-86
[5]   Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape [J].
Ceci, Stephen J. ;
Ginther, Donna K. ;
Kahn, Shulamit ;
Williams, Wendy M. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, 2014, 15 (03) :75-141
[6]   Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science [J].
Ceci, Stephen J. ;
Williams, Wendy M. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2011, 108 (08) :3157-3162
[7]   Gender Disparity in Citations in High-Impact Journal Articles [J].
Chatterjee, Paula ;
Werner, Rachel M. .
JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (07)
[8]   Who cites women? Whom do women cite? An exploration of gender and scholarly citation in sociology [J].
Davenport, E ;
Snyder, H .
JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, 1995, 51 (04) :404-410
[9]   Gendered Citation Patterns across Political Science and Social Science Methodology Fields [J].
Dion, Michelle L. ;
Sumner, Jane Lawrence ;
Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 26 (03) :312-327
[10]   The Possible Role of Resource Requirements and Academic Career-Choice Risk on Gender Differences in Publication Rate and Impact [J].
Duch, Jordi ;
Zeng, Xiao Han T. ;
Sales-Pardo, Marta ;
Radicchi, Filippo ;
Otis, Shayna ;
Woodruff, Teresa K. ;
Amaral, Luis A. Nunes .
PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (12)