Preoperative Non-Invasive Prediction of Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes With a Deep Convolutional Neural Network on Ultrasound Images

被引:9
作者
Li, Chunxiao [1 ]
Huang, Haibo [2 ]
Chen, Ying [2 ]
Shao, Sihui [1 ]
Chen, Jing [1 ]
Wu, Rong [1 ]
Zhang, Qi [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ Sch Med, Dept Ultrasound, Shanghai Gen Hosp, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Univ, SMART Smart Med & AI Based Radiol Technol Lab, Sch Commun & Informat Engn, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
deep convolutional neural network; ultrasound; breast cancer; molecular subtype; luminal A; triple-negative breast cancer; MACHINE LEARNING APPROACH; ASSOCIATION; MORTALITY; FEATURES; CHINA;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2022.848790
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposeThis study aimed to develop a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) model to classify molecular subtypes of breast cancer from ultrasound (US) images together with clinical information. MethodsA total of 1,012 breast cancer patients with 2,284 US images (center 1) were collected as the main cohort for training and internal testing. Another cohort of 117 breast cancer cases with 153 US images (center 2) was used as the external testing cohort. Patients were grouped according to thresholds of nodule sizes of 20 mm and age of 50 years. The DCNN models were constructed based on US images and the clinical information to predict the molecular subtypes of breast cancer. A Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon model was built on the same data based on morphological and clinical description parameters for diagnostic performance comparison. The diagnostic performance was assessed through the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, Youden's index (YI), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). ResultsOur DCNN model achieved better diagnostic performance than the BI-RADS lexicon model in differentiating molecular subtypes of breast cancer in both the main cohort and external testing cohort (all p < 0.001). In the main cohort, when classifying luminal A from non-luminal A subtypes, our model obtained an AUC of 0.776 (95% CI, 0.649-0.885) for patients older than 50 years and 0.818 (95% CI, 0.726-0.902) for those with tumor sizes <= 20 mm. For young patients <= 50 years, the AUC value of our model for detecting triple-negative breast cancer was 0.712 (95% CI, 0.538-0.874). In the external testing cohort, when classifying luminal A from non-luminal A subtypes for patients older than 50 years, our DCNN model achieved an AUC of 0.686 (95% CI, 0.567-0.806). ConclusionsWe employed a DCNN model to predict the molecular subtypes of breast cancer based on US images. Our model can be valuable depending on the patient's age and nodule sizes.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Computerized Image Analysis for Identifying Triple-Negative Breast Cancers and Differentiating Them from Other Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer on Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Images: A Feasibility Study [J].
Agner, Shannon C. ;
Rosen, Mark A. ;
Englander, Sarah ;
Tomaszewski, John E. ;
Feldman, Michael D. ;
Zhang, Paul ;
Mies, Carolyn ;
Schnall, Mitchell D. ;
Madabhushi, Anant .
RADIOLOGY, 2014, 272 (01) :91-99
[2]   Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype - A population-based study from the California Cancer Registry [J].
Bauer, Katrina R. ;
Brown, Monica ;
Cress, Rosemary D. ;
Parise, Carol A. ;
Caggiano, Vincent .
CANCER, 2007, 109 (09) :1721-1728
[3]   Estimating the benefits of therapy for early-stage breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Consensus Guidelines for the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2019 [J].
Burstein, H. J. ;
Curigliano, G. ;
Loibl, S. ;
Dubsky, P. ;
Gnant, M. ;
Poortmans, P. ;
Colleoni, M. ;
Denkert, C. ;
Piccart-Gebhart, M. ;
Regan, M. ;
Senn, H. -J. ;
Winer, E. P. ;
Thurlimann, B. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30 (10) :1541-1557
[4]   The role of ultrasonographic findings to predict molecular subtype, histologic grade, and hormone receptor status of breast cancer [J].
Celebi, Filiz ;
Pilanci, Kezban Nur ;
Ordu, Cetin ;
Agacayak, Filiz ;
Alco, Gul ;
Ilgun, Serkan ;
Sarsenov, Dauren ;
Erdogan, Zeynep ;
Ozmen, Vahit .
DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2015, 21 (06) :448-453
[5]   Characteristics of breast cancer in Central China, literature review and comparison with USA [J].
Chen, Chuang ;
Sun, Si ;
Yuan, Jing-Ping ;
Wang, Yao-Huai ;
Cao, Tian-Ze ;
Zheng, Hong-Mei ;
Jiang, Xue-Qing ;
Gong, Yi-Ping ;
Tu, Yi ;
Yao, Feng ;
Hu, Ming-Bai ;
Li, Juan-Juan ;
Sun, Sheng-Rong ;
Wei, Wen .
BREAST, 2016, 30 :208-213
[6]   A New Initiative on Precision Medicine [J].
Collins, Francis S. ;
Varmus, Harold .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2015, 372 (09) :793-795
[7]   VEGF-Mediated Angiogenesis Links EMT-Induced Cancer Stemness to Tumor Initiation [J].
Fantozzi, Anna ;
Gruber, Dorothea C. ;
Pisarsky, Laura ;
Heck, Chantal ;
Kunita, Akiko ;
Yilmaz, Mahmut ;
Meyer-Schaller, Nathalie ;
Cornille, Karen ;
Hopfer, Ulrike ;
Bentires-Alj, Mohamed ;
Christofori, Gerhard .
CANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 74 (05) :1566-1575
[8]   Predicting Breast Cancer Molecular Subtype with MRI Dataset Utilizing Convolutional Neural Network Algorithm [J].
Ha, Richard ;
Mutasa, Simukayi ;
Karcich, Jenika ;
Gupta, Nishant ;
Van Sant, Eduardo Pascual ;
Nemer, John ;
Sun, Mary ;
Chang, Peter ;
Liu, Michael Z. ;
Jambawalikar, Sachin .
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2019, 32 (02) :276-282
[9]   Detection and classification of breast cancer using logistic regression feature selection and GMDH classifier [J].
Khandezamin Z. ;
Naderan M. ;
Rashti M.J. .
Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 2020, 111
[10]   Descriptive epidemiology of breast cancer in China: incidence, mortality, survival and prevalence [J].
Li, Tong ;
Mello-Thoms, Claudia ;
Brennan, Patrick C. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 159 (03) :395-406