Partial ceramic crowns:: Influence of ceramic thickness, preparation design and luting material on fracture resistance and marginal integrity in vitro

被引:54
作者
Federlin, M. [1 ]
Krifka, S. [1 ]
Herpich, M. [1 ]
Hiller, K-A [1 ]
Schmalz, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Regensburg, Sch Dent, Dept Operat Dent & Periodontol, D-8400 Regensburg, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.2341/06-70
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
This in vitro study tested the effects of two different ceramic thicknesses, two preparation designs and two different luting agents on the marginal integrity and fracture resistance of partial ceramic crowns (PCC). Eighty extracted human molars were prepared according to the following preparation designs: a) Coverage of functional cusps/butt joint (n=40), b) Horizontal reduction of functional cusps (n=40). PCC (Vita Mark II, Cerec3 System) were fabricated and the ceramic thickness of the functional cusps was adjusted to 1): 0.5-1.0 mm and 2):1.5-2.0 mm. PCC were adhesively luted to the cavities with either Excite/VariolinkII (VL) or RelyX Unicem. (RX). The specimens were exposed to thermocycling and central mechanical loading (5000 x 5 degrees C-55 degrees C; 30 second/cycle; 50,0000 x 72.5N, 1.6Hz). Marginal integrity was assessed by evaluating dye penetration (fuchsine) on multiple sections in the bucco-oral direction by relating the actual penetration distance to the maximal length of the corresponding cavity wall (100%). Restoration/luting agent (RL)- and tooth/luting agent (TL) interfaces were evaluated separately. The data were statistically analyzed with the Mann Whitney U-test and the Error Rates Method (ERM), and the fracture rates were analyzed with the XI-test. Dye penetration data indicated that ceramic thickness and luting agent had a statistically significant influence upon marginal integrity in general, irrespective of all other parameters (ERM): RX showed significantly lower microleakage along the RL interface than VL. VL revealed significantly lower microleakage at the TL interface than RX. Fifteen PCC of group 1 (0.5-1.0 mm.) and two PCC of group 2 (1.5-2.0 mm) were fractured after thermocycling and central mechanical loading, with the difference being statistically significant. PCC fabricated from industrially sintered feldspathic ceramic should have at least a thickness of 1.5-2.0 mm in stress-bearing areas.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 260
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Bond strength of a new universal self-adhesive resin luting cement to dentin and enamel [J].
Abo-Hamar, SE ;
Hiller, KA ;
Jung, H ;
Federlin, M ;
Friedl, KH ;
Schmalz, G .
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2005, 9 (03) :161-167
[2]   Fracture toughness and hardness evaluation of three pressable all-ceramic dental materials [J].
Albakry, M ;
Guazzato, M ;
Swain, MV .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2003, 31 (03) :181-188
[3]   CONSERVATIVE POSTERIOR CERAMIC RESTORATIONS - A LITERATURE-REVIEW [J].
BANKS, RG .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1990, 63 (06) :619-626
[4]  
Broderson S P, 1994, Quintessence Int, V25, P535
[5]   Effects of surface finish and fatigue testing on the fracture strength of CAD-CAM and pressed-ceramic crowns [J].
Chen, HY ;
Hickel, R ;
Setcos, JC ;
Kunzelmann, KH .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1999, 82 (04) :468-475
[6]   Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin [J].
De Munck, J ;
Vargas, M ;
Van Landuyt, K ;
Hikita, K ;
Lambrechts, P ;
Van Meerbeek, B .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2004, 20 (10) :963-971
[7]  
Federlin M, 2004, OPER DENT, V29, P560
[8]   Two-year clinical performance of cast gold vs ceramic partial crowns [J].
Federlin, Marianne ;
Maenner, Tobias ;
Hiller, Karl-Anton ;
Schmidt, Sebastian ;
Schmalz, Gottfried .
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2006, 10 (02) :126-133
[9]   Retrospective clinical investigation and survival analysis on ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: results up to 7 years. [J].
Felden A. ;
Schmalz G. ;
Federlin M. ;
Hiller K.A. .
Clinical Oral Investigations, 1998, 2 (4) :161-167
[10]   Fracture toughness of dental ceramics: comparison of bending and indentation method [J].
Fischer, H ;
Marx, R .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2002, 18 (01) :12-19