Combination antibiotic therapy improves survival in patients with community-acquired pneumonia and shock

被引:135
作者
Rodriguez, Alejandro
Mendia, Angel
Sirvent, Josep-Maria
Barcenilla, Fernando
de la Torre-Prados, Maria Victoria
Sole-Violan, Jordi
Rello, Jordi [1 ]
机构
[1] Joan XXIII Univ Hosp, Intens Care Unit, Tarragona, Spain
[2] Hosp Nuerta Senora Aranzazu, Intens Care Unit, San Sebastian, Spain
[3] Hosp Univ G Rona, Dept Intens Care, Girona, Spain
[4] Amau De Vilanova Hosp, Infect Control Unit, Ueida, Spain
[5] Univ Virgen Victoria, Malaga, Spain
[6] Univ Malaga, Dept Med, E-29071 Malaga, Spain
[7] Hosp Univ Gran Canaria, Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Spain
[8] Rovira & Virgili Univ, Joan XXIII Univ Hosp, Crit Care Dept, Tarragona, Spain
关键词
community-acquired pneumonia; Streptococcus pneumoniae; combination therapy; bacteremia; macrolide;
D O I
10.1097/01.CCM.0000266755.75844.05
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess whether combination antibiotic therapy improves outcome of severe community-acquired pneumonia in the subset of patients with shock. Design. Secondary analysis of a prospective observational, cohort study. Setting. Thirty-three intensive care units (ICUs) in Spain. Patients. Patients were 529 adults with community-acquired pneumonia requiring ICU admission. Interventions: None. Measurement and Main Results. Two hundred and seventy (51%) patients required vasoactive drugs and were categorized as having shock. The effects of combination antibiotic therapy and monotherapy on survival were compared using univariate analysis and a Cox regression model. The adjusted 28-day in-ICU mortality was similar (p = .99) for combination antibiotic therapy 3 and monotherapy in the absence of shock. However, in patients with shock, combination antibiotic therapy was associated with significantly higher adjusted 28-day in-ICU survival (hazard ratio, 1.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-2.60; p = .01) in a Cox hazard regression model. Even when monotherapy was appropriate, it achieved a lower 28-day in-ICU survival than an adequate antibiotic combination (hazard ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.64). Conclusions: Combination antibiotic therapy does not seem to increase ICU survival in all patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia. However, in the subset of patients with shock, combination antibiotic therapy improves survival rates.
引用
收藏
页码:1493 / 1499
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Severe community-acquired pneumonia - Use of intensive care services and evaluation of American and British Thoracic Society diagnostic criteria [J].
Angus, DC ;
Marrie, TJ ;
Obrosky, DS ;
Clermont, G ;
Dremsizov, TT ;
Coley, C ;
Fine, MJ ;
Singer, DE ;
Kapoor, WN .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2002, 166 (05) :717-723
[2]   Combination antibiotic therapy lowers mortality among severely ill patients with pneumococcal bacteremia [J].
Baddour, LM ;
Yu, VL ;
Klugman, KP ;
Feldman, C ;
Ortqvist, A ;
Rello, J ;
Morris, AJ ;
Luna, CM ;
Snydman, DR ;
Ko, WC ;
Chedid, MBF ;
Hui, DS ;
Andremont, A ;
Chiou, CCC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2004, 170 (04) :440-444
[3]   Antibiotic prescription for community-acquired pneumonia in the intensive care unit:: Impact of adherence to Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines on survival [J].
Bodí, M ;
Rodríguez, A ;
Solé-Violán, J ;
Gilavert, MC ;
Garnacho, J ;
Blanquer, J ;
Jimenez, J ;
de la Torre, MV ;
Sirvent, JM ;
Almirall, J ;
Doblas, A ;
Badía, JR ;
García, F ;
Mendia, A ;
Jordá, R ;
Bobillo, F ;
Vallés, J ;
Broch, MJ ;
Carrasco, N ;
Herranz, MA ;
Rello, J .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2005, 41 (12) :1709-1716
[4]  
FELDMAN C, 2006, P AM THORAC SOC, V3, pA21
[5]   Prognosis and outcomes of patients with community-acquired pneumonia - A meta-analysis [J].
Fine, MJ ;
Smith, MA ;
Carson, CA ;
Mutha, SS ;
Sankey, SS ;
Weissfeld, LA ;
Kapoor, WN .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 275 (02) :134-141
[6]   Hospitalized community-acquired pneumonia in the elderly - Age- and sex-related patterns of care and outcome in the united states [J].
Kaplan, V ;
Angus, DC ;
Griffin, MF ;
Clermont, G ;
Watson, RS ;
Linde-Zwirble, WT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2002, 165 (06) :766-772
[7]   Oral gemifloxacin versus sequential therapy with intravenous ceftriaxone/oral cefuroxime with or without a macrolide in the treatment of patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia: A randomized, open-label, multicenter study of clinical efficacy and tolerability [J].
Lode, H ;
File, TM ;
Mandell, L ;
Ball, P ;
Pypstra, R ;
Thomas, M .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2002, 24 (11) :1915-1936
[8]   Optimal therapy for severe pneumococcal community-acquired pneumonia [J].
Lujan, Manel ;
Gallego, Miguel ;
Rello, Jordi .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2006, 32 (07) :971-980
[9]   Update of practice guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompetent adults [J].
Mandell, LA ;
Bartlett, JG ;
Dowell, SF ;
File, TM ;
Musher, DM ;
Whitney, C .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2003, 37 (11) :1405-1432
[10]   Monotherapy versus dual therapy for community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized patients [J].
Martinez, FJ .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 38 :S328-S340