A conceptual model for the integration of social and ecological information to understand human-wildlife interactions

被引:124
作者
Lischka, Stacy A. [1 ,2 ]
Teel, Tara L. [3 ]
Johnson, Heather E. [4 ,7 ]
Reed, Sarah E. [2 ,5 ]
Breck, Stewart [6 ]
Carlos, Andrew Don [5 ]
Crooks, Kevin R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Colorado Pk & Wildlife, Res Policy & Planning Branch, 317 W Prospect Ave, Ft Collins, CO 80526 USA
[2] Colorado State Univ, Dept Fish Wildlife & Conservat Biol, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[3] Colorado State Univ, Dept Human Dimens Nat Resources, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[4] Colorado Pk & Wildlife, Res Policy & Planning Branch, 415 Turner Dr, Durango, CO 81301 USA
[5] Wildlife Conservat Soc, Amer Program, 2300 Southern Blvd, Bronx, NY 10460 USA
[6] USDA, Natl Wildlife Res Ctr, Wildlife Serv, 4101 Laporte Ave, Ft Collins, CO 80521 USA
[7] US Geol Survey, Alaska Sci Ctr, 410 Univ Dr, Anchorage, AK 99508 USA
关键词
Social-ecological systems; Black bears; Carnivores; Social science; Human-bear conflict; Colorado; BLACK BEARS; CONSERVATION; CONFLICT; PERCEPTIONS; SCIENCE; MANAGEMENT; SELECTION; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2018.06.020
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
There is growing recognition that interdisciplinary approaches that account for both ecological and social processes are necessary to successfully address human-wildlife interactions. However, such approaches are hindered by challenges in aligning data types, communicating across disciplines, and applying social science information to conservation actions. To meet these challenges, we propose a conceptual model that adopts a social-ecological systems approach and integrates social and ecological theory to identify the multiple, nested levels of influence on both human and animal behavior. By accounting for a diverse array of influences and feedback mechanisms between social and ecological systems, this model fulfills a need for approaches that treat social and ecological processes with equal depth and facilitates a comprehensive understanding of the drivers of human and animal behaviors that perpetuate human-wildlife interactions. We apply this conceptual model to our work on human-black bear conflicts in Colorado, USA to demonstrate its utility. Using this example, we identify key lessons and offer guidance to researchers and conservation practitioners for applying integrated approaches to other human-wildlife systems.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 87
页数:8
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [11] Blumstein DT, 2010, PRIMER OF CONSERVATION BEHAVIOR, P1
  • [12] Determining Where the Wild Things will be: Using Psychological Theory to Find Tolerance for Large Carnivores
    Bruskotter, Jeremy T.
    Wilson, Robyn S.
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2014, 7 (03): : 158 - 165
  • [13] Coupled human and natural systems approach to wildlife research and conservation
    Carter, Neil H.
    Vina, Andres
    Hull, Vanessa
    McConnell, William J.
    Axinn, William
    Ghimire, Dirgha
    Liu, Jianguo
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2014, 19 (03):
  • [14] Complexities of conflict: the importance of considering social factors for effectively resolving human-wildlife conflict
    Dickman, A. J.
    [J]. ANIMAL CONSERVATION, 2010, 13 (05) : 458 - 466
  • [15] Don Carlos Andrew W., 2009, Human Dimensions of Wildlife, V14, P174, DOI 10.1080/10871200902839316
  • [16] Perceived barriers to integrating social science and conservation
    Fox, Helen E.
    Christian, Caroline
    Nordby, J. Cully
    Pergams, Oliver R. W.
    Peterson, Garry D.
    Pyke, Cristopher R.
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2006, 20 (06) : 1817 - 1820
  • [17] Gore ML, 2006, WILDLIFE SOC B, V34, P36, DOI 10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[36:SPORAW]2.0.CO
  • [18] 2
  • [19] Gore ML, 2006, URSUS, V17, P75, DOI 10.2192/1537-6176(2006)17[75:EPFRAB]2.0.CO
  • [20] 2