The 'neo-bureaucratic' state: Professionals, managers and professional managers in schools, general practices and social work

被引:119
作者
Farrell, C [1 ]
Morris, J
机构
[1] Univ Glamorgan, Sch Humanities & Social Sci, Pontypridd CF37 1DL, M Glam, Wales
[2] Cardiff Univ, Cardiff Business Sch, Cardiff CF10 3EU, S Glam, Wales
关键词
bureaucracy; managerialism; new public management; professionals; public services;
D O I
10.1177/1350508403010001380
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The major shifts in public policy during the past two decades have led to equally momentous changes in policy provision and its supporting structures. This has been characterized as 'post-bureaucracy' or 'beyond bureaucracy'. This article argues that while new governance forms have emerged, they do not fit the post-bureaucratic model in that while they may have reduced hierarchy, paradoxically, the changes have increased bureaucratic tendencies. The new governance structures also have implications for public-sector workers, and specifically for managers and professionals. The article explores the impact of the new governance of these groups of public-sector professionals, teachers, and social workers and doctors (general practitioners).
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 156
页数:28
相关论文
共 116 条
[1]  
Abercrombie Nicholas, 1991, Enterprise Culture. I
[3]   PUBLIC-SECTOR SERVICES AND THEIR MANAGEMENT [J].
ACKROYD, S ;
HUGHES, JA ;
SOOTHILL, K .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 1989, 26 (06) :603-619
[4]  
ACKROYD S, 1998, BUREAUCRACY NEW APPR
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1990, FORMATION PROFESSION
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2000, In Praise of Bureaucracy, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781446217580
[7]  
[Anonymous], POLITICS QUALITY PUB
[8]  
[Anonymous], QUASIMARKETS SOCIAL
[9]  
[Anonymous], PROFESSIONALS NEW MA
[10]  
[Anonymous], WORK ORG