Clinical and quality of life assessment in patients with latex allergy during COVID-19 pandemic: Possible protective role of continuous latex immunotherapy

被引:1
作者
Di Rienzo, Alessia [1 ]
Urbani, Sara [1 ]
Longhino, David [1 ]
Sarnari, Caterina [1 ]
Buonomo, Alessandro [1 ]
Rizzi, Angela [1 ]
Aruanno, Arianna [1 ]
Nucera, Eleonora [1 ]
机构
[1] Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli IRCCS, Allergy Unit, Largo F Vito 1, I-00168 Rome, Italy
关键词
Latex allergy; immunotherapy; COVID-19; SUBLINGUAL IMMUNOTHERAPY; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1177/03946320221100367
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Introduction: During COVID-19 pandemic, the massive use of Personal Protective Equipment could provoke severe adverse reactions in latex allergy patients and could negatively affect their quality of life. Methods: Trough a survey the study aimed: (a) to evaluate the incidence of allergic reactions in patients with latex allergy during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic; (b) to evaluate the protective role of continuous latex sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) during this period; and (c) to evaluate quality of life of natural rubber latex allergy (NRLA) patients during the pandemic. Results: 67 patients (9 males and 58 females, mean age of 45.9 +/- 11.4 years) suffering from latex allergy were included in the present study. We recorded among our patients 13 cases (34.2%) of urticarial/angioedema (U/A), 9 cases (23.6%) of respiratory symptoms (dyspnoea, shortness of breath and wheezing) and 7 cases (18.4%) of anaphylaxis. In patients who underwent continuous SLIT, we observed less cases of U/A (p < 0.001), respiratory symptoms (p < 0.001), anaphylaxis (p = 0.003), hospitalizations (p = 0.014) and a lower therapy administration. We compared the results of SF-36 questionnaire in patients who underwent continuous and not-continuous SLIT with a significance differences score between these two groups. Conclusions: Our study is the first that investigated the clinical and quality of life effects of COVID-19 pandemic in NRLA patients.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[11]  
Parisi CAS, 2016, ARCH ARGENT PEDIATR, V114, P30, DOI [10.5546/aap.2016.30, 10.5546/aap.2016.eng.30]
[12]   Contact urticaria and protein contact dermatitis in the Finnish Register of Occupational Diseases in a period of 12 years [J].
Pesonen, Maria ;
Koskela, Kirsi ;
Aalto-Korte, Kristiina .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2020, 83 (01) :1-7
[13]   Occupational hand dermatitis web survey in a university hospital during COVID-19 pandemic: the SHIELD study [J].
Rizzi, Angela ;
Inchingolo, Riccardo ;
Viola, Marinella ;
Boldrini, Luca ;
Lenkowicz, Jacopo ;
Lohmeyer, Franziska Michaela ;
De Simone, Francesco Maria ;
Staiti, Domenico ;
Sarnari, Caterina ;
Gasbarrini, Antonio ;
Nucera, Eleonora .
MEDICINA DEL LAVORO, 2021, 112 (04) :320-326
[14]   Sublingual immunotherapy in patients with latex allergy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Sridharan, Kannan ;
Sivaramakrishnan, Gowri .
JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL TREATMENT, 2017, 28 (07) :600-605
[15]   Primary prevention of latex allergy in healthcareuspectrum of strategies including the European glove standardization [J].
Wrangsjo, Karin ;
Boman, Anders ;
Liden, Carola ;
Meding, Birgitta .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2012, 66 (04) :165-171
[16]   Current prevalence rate of latex allergy: Why it remains a problem? [J].
Wu, Miaozong ;
McIntosh, James ;
Liu, Jian .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH, 2016, 58 (02) :138-144