Effect of a Price Transparency Intervention in the Electronic Health Record on Clinician Ordering of Inpatient Laboratory Tests The PRICE Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:57
|
作者
Sedrak, Mina S. [1 ]
Myers, Jennifer S. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Small, Dylan S. [5 ]
Nachamkin, Irving [3 ,4 ]
Ziemba, Justin B. [6 ]
Murray, Dana [3 ]
Kurtzman, Gregory W. [4 ,7 ]
Zhu, Jingsan [4 ]
Wang, Wenli [4 ]
Mincarelli, Deborah [3 ]
Danoski, Daniel [3 ]
Wells, Brian P. [3 ]
Berns, Jeffrey S. [3 ,4 ]
Brennan, Patrick J. [3 ,4 ]
Hanson, C. William [3 ,4 ]
Dine, C. Jessica [3 ,4 ]
Patel, Mitesh S. [3 ,4 ,5 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] City Hope Comprehens Canc Ctr, Duarte, CA USA
[2] Univ Penn Hlth Syst, Ctr Healthcare Improvement & Patient Safety, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Univ Penn Hlth Syst, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[6] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Brady Urol Inst, Baltimore, MD USA
[7] Univ Penn Hlth Syst, Penn Med Nudge Unit, Philadelphia, PA USA
[8] Crescenz Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
CARE; IMPACT; COST; DISPLAYS; INCREASE;
D O I
10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1144
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Many health systems are considering increasing price transparency at the time of order entry. However, evidence of its impact on clinician ordering behavior is inconsistent and limited to single-site evaluations of shorter duration. OBJECTIVE To test the effect of displaying Medicare allowable fees for inpatient laboratory tests on clinician ordering behavior over 1 year. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The Pragmatic Randomized Introduction of Cost data through the electronic health record (PRICE) trial was a randomized clinical trial comparing a 1-year intervention to a 1-year preintervention period, and adjusting for time trends and patient characteristics. The trial took place at 3 hospitals in Philadelphia between April 2014 and April 2016 and included 98 529 patients comprising 142 921 hospital admissions. INTERVENTIONS Inpatient laboratory test groups were randomly assigned to display Medicare allowable fees (30 in intervention) or not (30 in control) in the electronic health record. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcome was the number of tests ordered per patient-day. Secondary outcomes were tests performed per patient-day and Medicare associated fees. RESULTS The sample included 142 921 hospital admissions representing patients who were 51.9% white (74 165), 38.9% black (55 526), and 56.9% female (81 291) with a mean (SD) age of 54.7 (19.0) years. Preintervention trends of order rates among the intervention and control groups were similar. In adjusted analyses of the intervention group compared with the control group over time, there were no significant changes in overall test ordering behavior (0.05 tests ordered per patient-day; 95% CI, -0.002 to 0.09; P =.06) or associated fees ($0.24 per patient-day; 95% CI, -$0.42 to $0.91; P =.47). Exploratory subset analyses found small but significant differences in tests ordered per patient-day based on patient intensive care unit (ICU) stay (patients with ICU stay: -0.16; 95% CI, -0.31 to -0.01; P =.04; patients without ICU stay: 0.13; 95% CI, 0.08-0.17; P <.001) and the magnitude of associated fees (top quartile of tests based on fee value: -0.01; 95% CI, -0.02 to -0.01; P =.04; bottom quartile: 0.03; 95% CI, 0.002-0.06; P =.04). Adjusted analyses of tests that were performed found a small but significant overall increase in the intervention group relative to the control group over time (0.08 tests performed per patient day, 95% CI, 0.03-0.12; P <.001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Displaying Medicare allowable fees for inpatient laboratory tests did not lead to a significant change in overall clinician ordering behavior or associated fees.
引用
收藏
页码:939 / 945
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect on clinical trial participation by integration of a clinical pathway program into an electronic health record (EHR).
    Shamah, Corey J.
    Saphner, Thomas James
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (07)
  • [22] Electronic Health Record Population Health Management for Chronic Kidney Disease Care A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial
    Jhamb, Manisha
    Weltman, Melanie R.
    Devaraj, Susan M.
    Lavenburg, Linda-Marie Ustaris
    Han, Zhuoheng
    Alghwiri, Alaa A.
    Fischer, Gary S.
    Rollman, Bruce L.
    Nolin, Thomas D.
    Yabes, Jonathan G.
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2024, 184 (07) : 737 - 747
  • [23] Promoting change in the genitourinary care of postmenopausal women through clinician education and electronic health record tools: a cluster randomized trial
    Vesco, Kimberly
    Beadle, Kate
    Bulkley, Joanna
    Stoneburner, Ashley
    Leo, Michael
    Clark, Amanda
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2017, 12
  • [24] An electronic health record-based intervention to improve tobacco treatment in primary care: A randomized controlled trial
    Linder, J. A.
    Rigotti, N. A.
    Schneider, L. I.
    Kelley, J. K.
    Brawarsky, P.
    Haas, J. S.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 23 : 246 - 247
  • [25] Effect of Changing Electronic Health Record Opioid Analgesic Dispense Quantity Defaults on the Quantity Prescribed A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial
    Bachhuber, Marcus A.
    Nash, Denis
    Southern, William N.
    Heo, Moonseong
    Berger, Matthew
    Schepis, Mark
    Thakral, Manu
    Cunningham, Chinazo O.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (04)
  • [26] Effect of Passive Choice and Active Choice Interventions in the Electronic Health Record to Cardiologists on Statin Prescribing A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial
    Adusumalli, Srinath
    Westover, Julie E.
    Jacoby, Douglas S.
    Small, Dylan S.
    VanZandbergen, Christine
    Chen, Jessica
    Cavella, Ann M.
    Pepe, Rebecca
    Rareshide, Charles A. L.
    Snider, Christopher K.
    Volpp, Kevin G.
    Asch, David A.
    Patel, Mitesh S.
    JAMA CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 6 (01) : 40 - 48
  • [27] Electronic Health Record-Based Screening for Intimate Partner Violence: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial
    Lenert, Leslie
    Rheingold, Alyssa A.
    Simpson, Kit N.
    Scherbakov, Dmitry
    Aiken, Michael
    Hahn, Christine
    McCauley, Jenna L.
    Ennis, Naomi
    Diaz, Vanessa A.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (08)
  • [28] Effect of Restriction of the Number of Concurrently Open Records in an Electronic Health Record on Wrong-Patient Order Errors A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Adelman, Jason S.
    Applebaum, Jo R.
    Schechter, Clyde B.
    Berger, Matthew A.
    Reissman, Stan H.
    Thota, Raja
    Racine, Andrew D.
    Vawdrey, David K.
    Green, Robert A.
    Salmasian, Hojjat
    Schiff, Gordon D.
    Wright, Adam
    Landman, Adam
    Bates, David W.
    Koppel, Ross
    Galanter, William L.
    Lambert, Bruce L.
    Paparella, Susan
    Southern, William N.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 321 (18): : 1780 - 1787
  • [29] Effect of clinical decision rules, patient cost and malpractice information on clinician brain CT image ordering: a randomized controlled trial
    Ronald W. Gimbel
    Ronald G. Pirrallo
    Steven C. Lowe
    David W. Wright
    Lu Zhang
    Min-Jae Woo
    Paul Fontelo
    Fang Liu
    Zachary Connor
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 18
  • [30] Effect of clinical decision rules, patient cost and malpractice information on clinician brain CT image ordering: a randomized controlled trial
    Gimbel, Ronald W.
    Pirrallo, Ronald G.
    Lowe, Steven C.
    Wright, David W.
    Zhang, Lu
    Woo, Min-Jae
    Fontelo, Paul
    Liu, Fang
    Connor, Zachary
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2018, 18