Effect of a Price Transparency Intervention in the Electronic Health Record on Clinician Ordering of Inpatient Laboratory Tests The PRICE Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:57
|
作者
Sedrak, Mina S. [1 ]
Myers, Jennifer S. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Small, Dylan S. [5 ]
Nachamkin, Irving [3 ,4 ]
Ziemba, Justin B. [6 ]
Murray, Dana [3 ]
Kurtzman, Gregory W. [4 ,7 ]
Zhu, Jingsan [4 ]
Wang, Wenli [4 ]
Mincarelli, Deborah [3 ]
Danoski, Daniel [3 ]
Wells, Brian P. [3 ]
Berns, Jeffrey S. [3 ,4 ]
Brennan, Patrick J. [3 ,4 ]
Hanson, C. William [3 ,4 ]
Dine, C. Jessica [3 ,4 ]
Patel, Mitesh S. [3 ,4 ,5 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] City Hope Comprehens Canc Ctr, Duarte, CA USA
[2] Univ Penn Hlth Syst, Ctr Healthcare Improvement & Patient Safety, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Univ Penn Hlth Syst, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[6] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Brady Urol Inst, Baltimore, MD USA
[7] Univ Penn Hlth Syst, Penn Med Nudge Unit, Philadelphia, PA USA
[8] Crescenz Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
CARE; IMPACT; COST; DISPLAYS; INCREASE;
D O I
10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1144
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Many health systems are considering increasing price transparency at the time of order entry. However, evidence of its impact on clinician ordering behavior is inconsistent and limited to single-site evaluations of shorter duration. OBJECTIVE To test the effect of displaying Medicare allowable fees for inpatient laboratory tests on clinician ordering behavior over 1 year. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The Pragmatic Randomized Introduction of Cost data through the electronic health record (PRICE) trial was a randomized clinical trial comparing a 1-year intervention to a 1-year preintervention period, and adjusting for time trends and patient characteristics. The trial took place at 3 hospitals in Philadelphia between April 2014 and April 2016 and included 98 529 patients comprising 142 921 hospital admissions. INTERVENTIONS Inpatient laboratory test groups were randomly assigned to display Medicare allowable fees (30 in intervention) or not (30 in control) in the electronic health record. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcome was the number of tests ordered per patient-day. Secondary outcomes were tests performed per patient-day and Medicare associated fees. RESULTS The sample included 142 921 hospital admissions representing patients who were 51.9% white (74 165), 38.9% black (55 526), and 56.9% female (81 291) with a mean (SD) age of 54.7 (19.0) years. Preintervention trends of order rates among the intervention and control groups were similar. In adjusted analyses of the intervention group compared with the control group over time, there were no significant changes in overall test ordering behavior (0.05 tests ordered per patient-day; 95% CI, -0.002 to 0.09; P =.06) or associated fees ($0.24 per patient-day; 95% CI, -$0.42 to $0.91; P =.47). Exploratory subset analyses found small but significant differences in tests ordered per patient-day based on patient intensive care unit (ICU) stay (patients with ICU stay: -0.16; 95% CI, -0.31 to -0.01; P =.04; patients without ICU stay: 0.13; 95% CI, 0.08-0.17; P <.001) and the magnitude of associated fees (top quartile of tests based on fee value: -0.01; 95% CI, -0.02 to -0.01; P =.04; bottom quartile: 0.03; 95% CI, 0.002-0.06; P =.04). Adjusted analyses of tests that were performed found a small but significant overall increase in the intervention group relative to the control group over time (0.08 tests performed per patient day, 95% CI, 0.03-0.12; P <.001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Displaying Medicare allowable fees for inpatient laboratory tests did not lead to a significant change in overall clinician ordering behavior or associated fees.
引用
收藏
页码:939 / 945
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF INPATIENT LABORATORY TEST PRICE TRANSPARENCY IN THE ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD: THE PRICE TRIAL
    Sedrak, Mina
    Myers, Jennifer S.
    Small, Dylan
    Nachamkin, Irving
    Ziemba, Justin B.
    Murray, Dana
    Kurtzman, Gregory
    Zhu, Jingsan
    Wang, Wenli
    Mincarelli, Deborah
    Danoski, Daniel
    Wells, Brian
    Berns, Jeffrey S.
    Brennan, Patrick
    Hanson, Bill
    Dine, C. J.
    Patel, Mitesh
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2017, 32 : S101 - S101
  • [2] Price Transparency in the Electronic Health Record Reply
    Miller, Brian J.
    Slota, Jennifer M.
    Ehrenfeld, Jesse M.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 323 (03): : 281 - 282
  • [3] The effect of a test ordering software intervention on the prescription of unnecessary laboratory tests - a randomized controlled trial
    Carlos Manuel Silva Martins
    Andreia Sofia da Costa Teixeira
    Luís Filipe Ribeiro de Azevedo
    Luísa Maria Barbosa Sá
    Paulo Alexandre Azevedo Pereira Santos
    Maria Luciana Gomes Domingues do Couto
    Altamiro Manuel Rodrigues da Costa Pereira
    Alberto Augusto Oliveira Pinto Hespanhol
    Cristina Maria Nogueira da Costa Santos
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 17
  • [4] The effect of a test ordering software intervention on the prescription of unnecessary laboratory tests - a randomized controlled trial
    Silva Martins, Carlos Manuel
    da Costa Teixeira, Andreia Sofia
    Ribeiro de Azevedo, Luis Filipe
    Barbosa Sa, Luisa Maria
    Azevedo Pereira Santos, Paulo Alexandre
    Gomes Domingues do Couto, Maria Luciana
    Rodrigues da Costa Pereira, Altamiro Manuel
    Oliveira Pinto Hespanhol, Alberto Augusto
    Nogueira da Costa Santos, Cristina Maria
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2017, 17
  • [5] Effect of a price display intervention on laboratory test ordering behavior of general practitioners
    Dennis M. J. Muris
    Max Molenaers
    Trang Nguyen
    Paul W. M. P. Bergmans
    Bernadette A. C. van Acker
    Mariëlle M. E. Krekels
    Jochen W. L. Cals
    BMC Family Practice, 22
  • [6] Effect of a price display intervention on laboratory test ordering behavior of general practitioners
    Muris, Dennis M. J.
    Molenaers, Max
    Nguyen, Trang
    Bergmans, Paul W. M. P.
    van Acker, Bernadette A. C.
    Krekels, Marielle M. E.
    Cals, Jochen W. L.
    BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [7] Effect of restricting electronic health records on clinician efficiency: substudy of a randomized clinical trial
    Kneifati-Hayek, Jerard Z.
    Applebaum, Jo R.
    Schechter, Clyde B.
    Dal Col, Alexis
    Salmasian, Hojjat
    Southern, William N.
    Adelman, Jason S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2023, : 953 - 957
  • [8] Effect of Electronic Health Record Clinical Decision Support on Contextualization of Care A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Weiner, Saul J.
    Schwartz, Alan
    Weaver, Frances
    Galanter, William
    Olender, Sarah
    Kochendorfer, Karl
    Binns-Calvey, Amy
    Saini, Ravisha
    Iqbal, Sana
    Diaz, Monique
    Michelfelder, Aaron
    Varkey, Anita
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (10) : E2238231
  • [9] Association of an Active Choice Intervention in the Electronic Health Record Directed to Medical Assistants With Clinician Ordering and Patient Completion of Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests
    Hsiang, Esther Y.
    Mehta, Shivan J.
    Small, Dylan S.
    Rareshide, Charles A. L.
    Snider, Christopher K.
    Day, Susan C.
    Patel, Mitesh S.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2019, 2 (11) : E1915619
  • [10] A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF A BEHAVIORAL ECONOMIC INTERVENTION TO DECREASE CLINICIAN ORDERING OF LOW-VALUE HEALTH SERVICES
    Kullgren, J.
    Krupka, F.
    Schachter, A.
    Linden, A.
    Miller, J.
    Alford, J.
    Duffy, R.
    Adler-Milstein, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2016, 23 : S258 - S258