共 98 条
Delay Discounting as a Transdiagnostic Process in Psychiatric Disorders A Meta-analysis
被引:275
作者:
Amlung, Michael
[1
,2
]
Marsden, Emma
[1
]
Holshausen, Katherine
[1
,2
]
Morris, Vanessa
[1
]
Patel, Herry
[1
]
Vedelago, Lana
[1
]
Naish, Katherine R.
[1
]
Reed, Derek D.
[3
,4
]
McCabe, Randi E.
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] McMaster Univ, St Josephs Healthcare Hamilton, Peter Boris Ctr Addict Res, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Psychiat & Behav Neurosci, 100 W 5th St, Hamilton, ON L8N 3K7, Canada
[3] Univ Kansas, Dept Appl Behav Sci, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[4] Univ Kansas, Cofrin Logan Ctr Addict Res & Treatment, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
关键词:
BORDERLINE PERSONALITY-DISORDER;
OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE DISORDER;
EPISODIC FUTURE THINKING;
ANOREXIA-NERVOSA;
DECISION-MAKING;
CIGARETTE-SMOKING;
EATING-DISORDERS;
BIPOLAR DISORDER;
IMPULSIVITY;
REWARD;
D O I:
10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.2102
中图分类号:
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号:
100205 ;
摘要:
IMPORTANCE Delay discounting is a behavioral economic index of impulsive preferences for smaller-immediate or larger-delayed rewards that is argued to be a transdiagnostic process across health conditions. Studies suggest some psychiatric disorders are associated with differences in discounting compared with controls, but null findings have also been reported. OBJECTIVE To conduct a meta-analysis of the published literature on delay discounting in people with psychiatric disorders. DATA SOURCES PubMed, MEDLINE, PsycInfo, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched through December 10, 2018. The psychiatric keywords used were based on DSM-IV or DSM-5 diagnostic categories. Collected data were analyzed from December 10, 2018, through June 1, 2019. STUDY SELECTION Following a preregistered Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) protocol, 2 independent raters reviewed titles, abstracts, and full-text articles. English-language articles comparing monetary delay discounting between participants with psychiatric disorders and controls were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Hedges g effect sizes were computed and random-effects models were used for all analyses. Heterogeneity statistics, one-study-removed analyses, and publication bias indices were also examined. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Categorical comparisons of delay discounting between a psychiatric group and a control group. RESULTS The sample included 57 effect sizes from 43 studies across 8 diagnostic categories. Significantly steeper discounting for individuals with a psychiatric disorder compared with controls was observed for major depressive disorder (Hedges g=0.37; P=.002; k=7), schizophrenia (Hedges g=0.46; P=.004; k=12), borderline personality disorder (Hedges g=0.60; P<.001; k=8), bipolar disorder (Hedges g=0.68; P<.001; k=4), bulimia nervosa (Hedges g=0.41; P=.001; k=4), and binge-eating disorder (Hedges g=0.34; P=.001; k=7). In contrast, anorexia nervosa exhibited statistically significantly shallower discounting (Hedges g=-0.30; P<.001; k=10). Modest evidence of publication bias was indicated by a statistically significant Egger test for schizophrenia and at the aggregate level across studies. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Results of this study appear to provide empirical support for delay discounting as a transdiagnostic process across most of the psychiatric disorders examined; the literature search also revealed limited studies in some disorders, notably posttraumatic stress disorder, which is a priority area for research.
引用
收藏
页码:1176 / 1186
页数:11
相关论文