A Global Opinion-influencing Consensus Model based on the DeGroot

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Yuntian [1 ]
Chen, Xiaoliang [1 ]
Huang, Zexia [2 ]
Li, Xianyong [1 ]
Du, Yajun [1 ]
机构
[1] Xihua Univ, Sch Comp & Softvvare Engn, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Xihua Univ, Coll Sci, Chengdu, Peoples R China
来源
2022 IEEE 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS, IUCC/CIT/DSCI/SMARTCNS | 2022年
关键词
Opinion dynamics; Social network; Consensus; Self-persistence; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; SOCIAL NETWORKS; REACHING PROCESS; SELF-CONFIDENCE; FUSION PROCESS; DYNAMICS; FRAMEWORK; POWER;
D O I
10.1109/IUCC-CIT-DSCI-SmartCNS57392.2022.00039
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Social networks have become an important platform for transmitting and sharing information due to the rapid development of online social networks. Opinion dynamics have been examined through the consensus-reaching process (CRP) in social networks, which aims to model the evolution of opinions in social networks so that agents can reach a consensus. Many researchers have solved the CRP problem by improving the DeGroot model, which models divide agents into two categories, leaders and followers, and change the network structure or the values of the agents' opinions to bring the network to a consensus. However, all of them require the construction of leaders who can influence the entire network. Consensus cannot be achieved without the leaders. This paper proposes a global opinion-influencing consensus model (GOCM) to solve the CRP problem. A network agent refers not only to the opinion of its neighbors but also to the average opinion of the entire network. The numerical analysis indicates that our proposed GOCM can significantly accelerate the achievement of an expected consensus.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 197
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mixed Opinion Dynamics Based on DeGroot Model and Hegselmann-Krause Model in Social Networks
    Wu, Zhibin
    Zhou, Qinyue
    Dong, Yucheng
    Xu, Jiuping
    Altalhi, Abdulrahman H.
    Herrera, Francisco
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2023, 53 (01): : 296 - 308
  • [2] Managing consensus based on community classification in opinion dynamics
    Zhang, Yuntian
    Chen, Xiaoliang
    Huang, Zexia
    Li, Xianyong
    Du, Yajun
    NETWORKS AND HETEROGENEOUS MEDIA, 2023, 18 (02) : 813 - 841
  • [3] DeGroot-Based Opinion Formation Under a Global Steering Mechanism
    Conjeaud, Ivan
    Lorenz-Spreen, Philipp
    Kalogeratos, Argyris
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL SOCIAL SYSTEMS, 2024, 11 (03) : 4040 - 4057
  • [4] Consensus reaching in social network DeGroot Model: The roles of the Self-confidence and node degree
    Ding, Zhaogang
    Chen, Xia
    Dong, Yucheng
    Herrera, Francisco
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2019, 486 : 62 - 72
  • [5] Soft-Control for Collective Opinion of Weighted DeGroot Model
    Han Huawei
    Qiang Chengcang
    Wang Caiyun
    Han Jing
    JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE & COMPLEXITY, 2017, 30 (03) : 550 - 567
  • [6] Disagreement and Polarization for Extended DeGroot Opinion Dynamics Model in Social Networks
    Huang, Shun
    Liu, Qingsong
    Chai, Li
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 33RD CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE (CCDC 2021), 2021, : 2502 - 2507
  • [7] A two-step communication opinion dynamics model with self-persistence and influence index for social networks based on the DeGroot model
    Zhou, Qinyue
    Wu, Zhibin
    Altalhi, Abdulrahman H.
    Herrera, Francisco
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2020, 519 : 363 - 381
  • [8] From the DeGroot Model to the DeGroot-Non-Consensus Model: The Jump States and the Frozen Fragment States
    Qian, Xiaolan
    Han, Wenchen
    Yang, Junzhong
    MATHEMATICS, 2024, 12 (02)
  • [9] Managing consensus based on leadership in opinion dynamics
    Dong, Yucheng
    Ding, Zhaogang
    Martinez, Luis
    Herrera, Francisco
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2017, 397 : 187 - 205
  • [10] Soft-Control for Collective Opinion of Weighted DeGroot Model
    HAN Huawei
    QIANG Chengcang
    WANG Caiyun
    HAN Jing
    Journal of Systems Science & Complexity, 2017, 30 (03) : 550 - 567