The gastro-oesophageal reflux disease impact scale: a patient management tool for primary care

被引:96
作者
Jones, R.
Coyne, K.
Wiklund, I.
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Dept Gen Practice & Primary Care, London WC2R 2LS, England
[2] United BioSource Corp, Ctr Hlth Outcomes Res, Bethesda, MD USA
[3] AstraZeneca R&D, Molndal, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03343.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease have a substantial impact on patients' everyday lives. Aim To develop and test a short questionnaire to aid patient-doctor communication. Methods The Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease Impact Scale was developed from a systematic literature review, focus groups of patients and primary care physicians, and patient cognitive interviews. A psychometric validation study was conducted based on two consultations in new (n = 100) or chronic (n = 105) gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients. Results The Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease Impact Scale demonstrated internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.68 to 0.82), reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient in stable patients ranged from 0.61 to 0.72) and construct validity (Spearman correlations with Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia instrument and Reflux Disease Questionnaire: 0.5-0.8 in both patient groups). Effect sizes in new and chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients ranged from 0.9 to 1.5 and 0.32 to 0.42, respectively. Doctors reported altering their treatment decision based on information provided by the Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease Impact Scale in 35% of patients, and 77% of doctors found it to be useful. Conclusions The Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease Impact Scale demonstrated good psychometric properties in newly diagnosed gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients and those already receiving treatment. This simple communication tool is a useful aid for managing primary care patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.
引用
收藏
页码:1451 / 1459
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], SAS VERS 8 02
  • [2] Carlsson R, 1998, SCAND J GASTROENTERO, V33, P1023
  • [3] Discrepancies between patient-reported outcomes and clinician-reported outcomes in chronic venous disease, irritable bowel syndrome, and peripheral arterial occlusive disease
    Chassany, O
    Le Jeunne, P
    Duracinsky, M
    Schwalm, MS
    Mathieu, M
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2006, 9 (01) : 39 - 46
  • [4] Accuracy of endoscopic databases for assessing patient symptoms: comparison with self-reported questionnaires in patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus
    Corley, DA
    Cello, JP
    Koch, J
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 51 (02) : 129 - 133
  • [5] Does it matter why heartburn sufferers seek health care?
    Crawley, JA
    Hamelin, B
    Gallagher, E
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2000, 118 (04) : A209 - A209
  • [6] Cronbach LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297
  • [7] Symptom evaluation in reflux disease: workshop background, processes, terminology, recommendations, and discussion outputs
    Dent, J
    Armstrong, D
    Delaney, B
    Moayyedi, P
    Talley, NJ
    Vakil, N
    [J]. GUT, 2004, 53 : 1 - 24
  • [8] Physicians' recognition of the symptoms experienced by HIV patients:: How reliable?
    Fontaine, A
    Larue, F
    Lassaunière, JM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1999, 18 (04) : 263 - 270
  • [9] Interpreting treatment effects in randomised trials
    Guyatt, GH
    Juniper, EF
    Walter, SD
    Griffith, LE
    Goldstein, RS
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 316 (7132) : 690 - 693
  • [10] MEASUREMENT OF HEALTH-STATUS - ASCERTAINING THE MINIMAL CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE
    JAESCHKE, R
    SINGER, J
    GUYATT, GH
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1989, 10 (04): : 407 - 415