Birth plans: A systematic, integrative review into their purpose, process, and impact

被引:18
作者
Bell, Ms Catherine H. [1 ,3 ]
Muggleton, Sally [1 ]
Davis, Deborah L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Canberra, Fac Hlth, Canberra, Australia
[2] ACT Govt Hlth Directorate, Canberra, Australia
[3] Univ Canberra, Midwifery, POB 21,Braid wood, Canberra, NSW 2622, Australia
关键词
Birth plan; Decision making; Childbearing women; Systematic review; Communication; DECISION-MAKING; CHILDBIRTH EDUCATION; WOMENS EXPERIENCES; DELIVERY; CHOICE; EXPLORATION; MIDWIVES; REFUSAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.midw.2022.103388
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: The birth plan was introduced in the 1980s to facilitate communication between maternity care providers and women and increase agency for childbearing women in the face of medicalised birth. Forty years on, the birth plan is a heterogeneous document with uncertainty surrounding its purpose, process, and impact. The aim of this review was to synthesise the evidence and improve understanding of the purpose, process and impact of the birth plan on childbearing women's experiences and outcomes. Methods: This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search strategy was designed and applied to electronic databases CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsychINFO, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Articles were appraised using the Crowe Critical Appraisal Tool and a five-step integrative approach to analysis followed. Findings: Eleven articles were identified, all quantitative in nature. It is clear that the general purpose of birth plans is communication, with decision making a key factor. Even though the processes of birth planning were varied, having a birth plan was associated with generally positive birth outcomes. Conclusions: Despite the heterogeneity of birth plans, birth plans were associated with positive outcomes for childbearing women when developed in collaboration with care providers. The act of collaboratively creating a birth plan may improve obstetric outcomes, aid realistic expectations, and improve satisfaction and the sense of control. (c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 73 条
  • [41] Perspective: Childbirth education in Australia: Have we lost our way?
    Levett, Kate
    Dahlen, Hannah G.
    [J]. WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2019, 32 (04) : 291 - 293
  • [42] Australian women's perception of their preparation for and actual experience of a recent scheduled caesarean birth
    Lewis, Lucy
    Hauck, Yvonne L.
    Ritchie, Stephanie
    Barnett, Lisa
    Nunan, Heather
    Rivers, Catherine
    [J]. MIDWIFERY, 2014, 30 (03) : E131 - E136
  • [43] Exploring women's experiences of participation in shared decision-making during childbirth: a qualitative study at a reference hospital in Spain
    Lopez-Toribio, Maria
    Bravo, Paulina
    Llupia, Anna
    [J]. BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [44] Birth plans: The good, the bad, and the future
    Lothian, J
    [J]. JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2006, 35 (02): : 295 - 303
  • [45] Consent
    Love, Christopher
    Pace, Nick
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 19 (05) : 263 - 266
  • [46] Post-traumatic stress disorder following childbirth: an update of current issues and recommendations for future research
    McKenzie-McHarg, Kirstie
    Ayers, Susan
    Ford, Elizabeth
    Horsch, Antje
    Jomeen, Julie
    Sawyer, Alexandra
    Stramrood, Claire
    Thomson, Gill
    Slade, Pauline
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE AND INFANT PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 33 (03) : 219 - 237
  • [47] Medeiros Renata Marien Knupp, 2019, Rev. Gaúcha Enferm., V40, pe20180233
  • [48] Birth Plans: What Matters for Birth Experience Satisfaction
    Mei, Jenny Y.
    Afshar, Yalda
    Gregory, Kimberly D.
    Kilpatrick, Sarah J.
    Esakoff, Tania F.
    [J]. BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2016, 43 (02): : 144 - 150
  • [49] Effect of birth plans on childbirth experience: A systematic review
    Mirghafourvand, Mojgan
    Charandabi, Sakineh Mohammad Alizadeh
    Ghanbari-Homayi, Solmaz
    Jahangiry, Leila
    Nahaee, Jila
    Hadian, Tahereh
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE, 2019, 25 (04)
  • [50] Moher D, 2009, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V339, DOI [10.1186/2046-4053-4-1, 10.1136/bmj.b2535, 10.1136/bmj.i4086, 10.1136/bmj.b2700, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.07.299, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097]