Phylogenetic Comparative Methods and the Evolution of Multivariate Phenotypes

被引:88
作者
Adams, Dean C. [1 ]
Collyer, Michael L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Ecol Evolut & Organismal Biol, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] Chatham Univ, Dept Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15232 USA
来源
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY, EVOLUTION, AND SYSTEMATICS, VOL 50 | 2019年 / 50卷
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
multivariate; phylogenetic comparative methods; macroevolution; shape analysis; high-dimensional data; MORPHOLOGICAL DIVERSIFICATION; ECOMORPHOLOGICAL CONVERGENCE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS; ECOLOGICAL OPPORTUNITY; STABILIZING SELECTION; SHELL SHAPE; R PACKAGE; RATES; INTEGRATION; MODELS;
D O I
10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110218-024555
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Evolutionary biology is multivariate, and advances in phylogenetic comparative methods for multivariate phenotypes have surged to accommodate this fact. Evolutionary trends in multivariate phenotypes are derived from distances and directions between species in a multivariate phenotype space. For these patterns to be interpretable, phenotypes should be characterized by traits in commensurate units and scale. Visualizing such trends, as is achieved with phylomorphospaces, should continue to play a prominent role in macroevolutionary analyses. Evaluating phylogenetic generalized least squares (PGLS) models (e.g., phylogenetic analysis of variance and regression) is valuable, but using parametric procedures is limited to only a few phenotypic variables. In contrast, nonparametric, permutation-based PGLS methods provide a flexible alternative and are thus preferred for high-dimensional multivariate phenotypes. Permutation-based methods for evaluating covariation within multivariate phenotypes are also well established and can test evolutionary trends in phenotypic integration. However, comparing evolutionary rates and modes in multivariate phenotypes remains an important area of future development.
引用
收藏
页码:405 / 425
页数:21
相关论文
共 107 条
[81]   Evolutionary conservatism and convergence both lead to striking similarity in ecology, morphology and performance across continents in frogs [J].
Moen, Daniel S. ;
Irschick, Duncan J. ;
Wiens, John J. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 280 (1773)
[82]   How to measure and test phylogenetic signal [J].
Muenkemueller, Tamara ;
Lavergne, Sebastien ;
Bzeznik, Bruno ;
Dray, Stephane ;
Jombart, Thibaut ;
Schiffers, Katja ;
Thuiller, Wilfried .
METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2012, 3 (04) :743-756
[83]   Basicranium and face: Assessing the impact of morphological integration on primate evolution [J].
Neaux, Dimitri ;
Sansalone, Gabriele ;
Ledogar, Justin A. ;
Ledogar, Sarah Heins ;
Luk, Theodora H. Y. ;
Wroe, Stephen .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN EVOLUTION, 2018, 118 :43-55
[84]  
O'Meara BC, 2006, EVOLUTION, V60, P922
[85]  
Olson E. C., 1958, MORPHOLOGICAL INTEGR
[86]   Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution [J].
Pagel, M .
NATURE, 1999, 401 (6756) :877-884
[87]   Phylogenetic history, allometry and disparate functional pressures influence the morphological diversification of the gekkotan quadrate, a keystone cranial element [J].
Paluh, Daniel J. ;
Bauer, Aaron M. .
BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 2018, 125 (04) :693-708
[88]   Measuring Morphological Integration Using Eigenvalue Variance [J].
Pavlicev, Mihaela ;
Cheverud, James M. ;
Wagner, Gunter P. .
EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2009, 36 (01) :157-170
[89]   The evolution of climatic niches in squamate reptiles [J].
Pie, Marcio R. ;
Campos, Leonardo L. F. ;
Meyer, Andreas L. S. ;
Duran, Andressa .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 284 (1858)
[90]   Phylogenetic Principal Components Analysis and Geometric Morphometrics [J].
Polly, P. David ;
Lawing, A. Michelle ;
Fabre, Anne-Claire ;
Goswami, Anjali .
HYSTRIX-ITALIAN JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 2013, 24 (01) :33-41