Testing the regional genetic representativeness of captive koala populations in South-East Queensland

被引:6
作者
Seddon, Jennifer M. [1 ]
Lee, Kristen E. [2 ]
Johnston, Stephen D. [3 ]
Nicolson, Vere N. [4 ]
Pyne, Michael [5 ]
Carrick, Frank N. [2 ]
Ellis, William A. H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Vet Sci, Gatton, Qld 4343, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sustainable Minerals Inst, Ctr Mined Land Rehabil, Koala Study Program, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Sch Agr & Food Sci, Wildlife Biol Unit, Gatton, Qld 4343, Australia
[4] Dreamworld, Coomera, Qld 4209, Australia
[5] Currumbin Wildlife Sanctuary, Currumbin, Qld 4223, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
ex situ conservation; koala; reservoir; zoo; EX-SITU CONSERVATION; PHASCOLARCTOS-CINEREUS; BREEDING PROGRAMS; DIVERSITY; VARIABILITY; SOFTWARE; DNA; DIFFERENTIATION; INDIVIDUALS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1071/WR13103
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Context. Captive breeding for release back to the wild is an important component of ex situ conservation but requires genetic diversity that is representative of the wild population and has the ultimate goal of producing ecologically sustainable and resilient populations. However, defining and testing for representativeness of captive populations is difficult. Koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) are bred for educational and tourism purposes in zoos and wildlife parks in South-East Queensland, but there are drastic declines evident in some wild koala populations in this region. Aim. We compared genetic diversity at microsatellite loci and mitochondrial DNA in two captive koala populations with that of the local, wild koalas of South-East Queensland, determining the degree to which genetic diversity of neutral loci had been preserved and was represented in the captive populations. Key results. The expected heterozygosity and the allelic richness was significantly greater in one captive colony than one wild South-East Queensland population. There was low but significant differentiation of the captive from wild populations using FST, with greater differentiation described by Jost'sDest. In contrast, a newly introduced Kullback-Leibler divergence measure, which assesses similarity of allele frequencies, showed no significant divergence of colony and wild populations. The captive koalas lacked many of the mitochondrial haplotypes identified from South-East Queensland koalas and possessed seven other haplotypes. Conclusions. Captive colonies of koalas have maintained levels of overall neutral genetic diversity similar to wild populations at microsatellite loci and low but significant differentiation likely resulted from drift and founder effects in small captive colonies or declining wild populations. Mitochondrial DNA suggests that captive founders were from a wider geographic source or that haplotypes have been lost locally. Implications. Overall, tested captive koalas maintain sufficient microsatellite diversity to act as an in situ reservoir for neutral genetic diversity of regional populations.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 286
页数:10
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Successful artificial insemination in the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) using extended and extended-chilled semen collected by electroejaculation [J].
Allen, Camryn D. ;
Burridge, Michelle ;
Mulhall, Sarah ;
Chafer, Mandy L. ;
Nicolson, Vere N. ;
Pyne, Michael ;
Zee, Yeng Peng ;
Jago, Sophia C. ;
Lundie-Jenkins, Geoff ;
Holt, William V. ;
Carrick, Frank N. ;
Curlewis, Jonathan D. ;
Lisle, Allan T. ;
Johnston, Stephen D. .
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 2008, 78 (04) :661-666
[2]  
Ballou Jonathan D., 1995, P76
[3]  
Belkhir K., 1996, Genetix, logiciel sous Windows! pour la genetique des populations
[4]   The ghost of genetic diversity past: Historical DNA analysis of the greater prairie chicken [J].
Bouzat, JL ;
Lewin, HA ;
Paige, KN .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1998, 152 (01) :1-6
[5]   Can small, isolated primate populations be effectively reinforced through the release of individuals from a captive population? [J].
Britt, A ;
Welch, C ;
Katz, A .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2004, 115 (02) :319-327
[6]   Management of genetic diversity of subdivided populations in conservation programmes [J].
Caballero, A. ;
Rodriguez-Ramilo, S. T. ;
Avila, V. ;
Fernandez, J. .
CONSERVATION GENETICS, 2010, 11 (02) :409-419
[7]   DNA barcoding applied to ex situ tropical amphibian conservation programme reveals cryptic diversity in captive populations [J].
Crawford, Andrew J. ;
Cruz, Catalina ;
Griffith, Edgardo ;
Ross, Heidi ;
Ibanez, Roberto ;
Lips, Karen R. ;
Driskell, Amy C. ;
Bermingham, Eldredge ;
Crump, Paul .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES, 2013, 13 (06) :1005-1018
[8]   smogd: software for the measurement of genetic diversity [J].
Crawford, Nicholas G. .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES, 2010, 10 (03) :556-557
[9]   Strategic planning for captive populations: projecting changes in genetic diversity [J].
Earnhardt, JM ;
Thompson, SD ;
Schad, K .
ANIMAL CONSERVATION, 2004, 7 :9-16
[10]   Spatiotemporal dynamics of habitat use by koalas: the checkerboard model [J].
Ellis, William A. H. ;
Melzer, Alistair ;
Bercovitch, Fred B. .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 2009, 63 (08) :1181-1188