Impact of different long-term maintenance immunosuppressive therapy strategies on patients' outcome after heart transplantation

被引:48
作者
Dandel, Michael [1 ]
Lehmkuhl, Hans Brendan [1 ]
Knosalla, Christoph [1 ]
Hetzer, Roland [1 ]
机构
[1] Deutsch Herzzentrum Berlin, Dept Cardiothorac & Vasc Surg, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Heart transplantation; Immunosuppression; Rejection; Drug toxicity; Outcome; CARDIAC ALLOGRAFT VASCULOPATHY; INHIBITOR-FREE IMMUNOSUPPRESSION; PROLIFERATION SIGNAL INHIBITORS; SOLID-ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION; MYCOPHENOLATE-MOFETIL; CALCINEURIN-INHIBITOR; RENAL-FUNCTION; INDUCTION THERAPY; ACUTE REJECTION; CYCLOSPORINE NEPHROTOXICITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.trim.2010.04.007
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
The introduction of cyclosporine in the early 1980s meant a decisive improvement in post-transplant outcomes for all solid-organ transplants and, in particular, it allowed heart transplantation to emerge as a viable therapeutic option for patients with end-stage cardiac failure. Many factors, including recipient and donor selection, organ preservation and the technical aspects of the transplant itself, influence postoperative outcomes following heart transplantation but the continued need to treat the recipient's immune response plays a key role in determining long-term outcomes. Thereby interactions between immunosuppressive drugs used in different combinations play an important role in patients' outcome. After more than two decades, significant controversy still exists as to the best immunosuppressive regimen for long-term maintenance. During the 1990s and 2000s, newer immunosuppressive medications, specifically, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, sirolimus, everolimus and the IL-2 receptor blockers (daclizumab and basiliximab), were introduced that allow the clinician several options to try to minimize side effects and maximize the desired therapeutic effects. The side effects involve direct organ toxicity (e.g. renal and hepatic dysfunction), metabolic disturbances, (e.g. diabetes, hyperlipidemia and hypertension), neurotoxicity, and several other significant adverse events, such as cholestasis and myelosuppression. Newer immunosuppressive drugs can impair wound healing, induce lung toxicity and produce various cytopenic states. Steroids continue to plague patients with their well-known side effects. This article reviews the current data on the benefits and risks of the various therapeutic regimens available, which are analyzed under three main themes: calcineurin inhibitor based therapies, calcineurin minimization protocols and calcineurin free regimens. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 103
页数:11
相关论文
共 88 条
  • [11] Influence of induction therapy, immunosuppressive regimen. and anti-viral prophylaxis on development of lymphomas after heart transplantation:: Data from the Spanish post-heart transplant tumour registry
    Crespo-Leiro, Maria G.
    Alonso-Pulpon, Luis
    Arizón, Jos M.
    Almenar, Luis
    Delgado, Juan F.
    Palomo, Jesus
    Manito, Nicolas
    Rabago, Gregorio
    Lage, Ernesto
    Diaz, Beatriz
    Roig, Eulalia
    Pascual, Domingo
    Blasco, Teresa
    de la Fuente, Luis
    Camprecios, Marta
    de Prada, Jose A. Vazquez
    Muniz, Javier
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 26 (11) : 1105 - 1109
  • [12] Calcineurin inhibitors in heart transplantation
    Crespo-Leiro, MG
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 37 (09) : 4018 - 4020
  • [13] Maintenance Immunosuppression With Mycophenolate Mofetil: Long-Term Efficacy and Safety After Heart Transplantation
    Dandel, M.
    Jasaityte, R.
    Lehmkuhl, H.
    Knosalla, C.
    Hetzer, R.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 41 (06) : 2585 - 2588
  • [14] Immunosuppression and Long-Term Survival after Heart Transplantation
    Dandel, M.
    [J]. THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON, 2009, 57 : S148 - S150
  • [15] Three-year results of a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine in cardiac transplant recipients
    Eisen, HJ
    Kobashigawa, J
    Keogh, A
    Bourge, R
    Renlund, D
    Mentzer, R
    Alderman, E
    Valantine, H
    Dureau, G
    Mancini, D
    Mamelok, R
    Gordon, R
    Wang, WD
    Mehra, M
    Constanzo, MR
    Hummel, M
    Johnson, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 24 (05) : 517 - 525
  • [16] Everolimus for the prevention of allograft rejection and vasculopathy in cardiac-transplant recipients
    Eisen, HJ
    Tuzcu, EM
    Dorent, R
    Kobashigawa, J
    Mancini, D
    Valantine-von Kaeppler, HA
    Starling, RC
    Sorensen, K
    Hummel, M
    Lind, JM
    Abeywickrama, KH
    Bernhardt, P
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 349 (09) : 847 - 858
  • [17] Tacrolimus Versus Cyclosporine Microemulsion for Heart Transplant Recipients: A Meta-analysis
    Fan Ye
    Xiao Ying-Bin
    Weng Yu-Guo
    Hetzer, Roland
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 28 (01) : 58 - 66
  • [18] Basiliximab versus rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin for induction therapy in patients after heart transplantation
    Flaman, Flavia
    Zieroth, Shelley
    Rao, Vivek
    Ross, Heather
    Delgado, Diego H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 25 (11) : 1358 - 1362
  • [19] Calcineurin inhibitor-sparing regimens in solid organ transplantation: focus on improving renal function and nephrotoxicity
    Flechner, Stuart M.
    Kobashigawa, Jon
    Klintmalm, Goran
    [J]. CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 22 (01) : 1 - 15
  • [20] Superior prevention of acute rejection by tacrolimus vs. cyclosporine in heart transplant recipients -: A large European trial
    Grimm, M
    Rinaldi, M
    Yonan, NA
    Arpesella, G
    Del Prado, JMA
    Pulpén, LA
    Villemot, JP
    Frigerio, M
    Lambert, JLR
    Crespo-Leiro, MG
    Almenar, L
    Duveau, D
    Ordonez-Fernandez, A
    Gandjbakhch, J
    Maccherini, M
    Laufer, G
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 6 (06) : 1387 - 1397