Payoff dominance vs. cognitive transparency in decision making

被引:56
|
作者
Irwin, JR [1 ]
McClelland, GH
McKee, M
Schulze, WD
Norden, NE
机构
[1] Univ New Mexico, Dept Econ, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
[2] NYU, Stern Sch Business, New York, NY USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Dept Psychol, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[4] Cornell Univ, Dept Agr Econ, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1465-7295.1998.tb01713.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper reports on three laboratory experiments designed to investigate the roles of decision costs and rewards on the accuracy of economic decisions. The experimental vehicle is a purchase decision employing the Becker-DeGroot-Marshak (BDM) mechanism. The first experiment verifies the incentive-compatibility of the BDM in a pure induced-value setting; the second tests its performance under different information regimes and payoff schedules; the third addresses the role of feedback information. Steep payoff schedules are found to be necessary to optimizing behavior only in cases where subjects must search out an optimal strategy rather than being able to deduce it from information provided.
引用
收藏
页码:272 / 285
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] From Social Network (Centralized vs. Decentralized) to Collective Decision-Making (Unshared vs. Shared Consensus)
    Sueur, Cedric
    Deneubourg, Jean-Louis
    Petit, Odile
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (02):
  • [32] Perfect Bayesian vs. Imperfect Bayesian in Small Decision Making Problems
    Takemi Fujikawa
    Behaviormetrika, 2007, 34 (1) : 27 - 44
  • [33] Platelet kinetics with probe vs. camera - Differences in clinical decision making?
    Sandrock, D
    Dopichj-Menge, U
    Munz, DL
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1999, 40 (05) : 212P - 212P
  • [34] Working with Black vs. White patients: an experimental test of therapist decision-making in cognitive behavioral therapy for depression
    Ezawa, Iony D.
    Strunk, Daniel R.
    COGNITIVE BEHAVIOUR THERAPY, 2022, 51 (03) : 229 - 242
  • [35] Stochastic dominance and medical decision making
    Leshno M.
    Levy H.
    Health Care Management Science, 2004, 7 (3) : 207 - 215
  • [36] HOW TO AVOID ARBITRARY DECISIONS? - ACTUAL VS. TARGET DECISION MAKING
    Kehrer, Johannes
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT ENGINEERING (ICTTE), 2016, : 721 - 728
  • [37] Ethical decision making: Individual vs. public protection in a cognitive impairment assisted living facility (ALF): Justice and beneficence for whom?
    Biedenbender, R
    Bennet, L
    Fowler, C
    Regan, S
    Hovland, B
    Gravenstein, S
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2005, 53 (04) : S137 - S137
  • [38] Strategic decision making in an intuitive vs. technocratic mode: structural and environmental considerations
    Covin, JG
    Slevin, DP
    Heeley, MB
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2001, 52 (01) : 51 - 67
  • [39] Examining learning coherence in group decision-making: triads vs. tetrads
    Tsutomu Harada
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [40] Investment Decision-Making for Transport Infrastructure Projects: Optimizing vs. Satisficing
    Tiep Nguyen
    Hallo, Leonie
    Gunawan, Indra
    Phu Tran
    2020 IEEE 15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF SYSTEM OF SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (SOSE 2020), 2020, : 41 - 46