Conflict in decision making and variation in public administration outcomes in Italy during the COVID-19 crisis???PALABRAS CLAVE

被引:24
作者
Malandrino, Anna [1 ]
Demichelis, Elena [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Bologna, Italy
关键词
multilevel governance; decision making; public administration; administrative discretion; judicial system; gobernanza multinivel; toma de decisiones; administracion publica; discrecionalidad administrativa; sistema judicial; CRISIS MANAGEMENT; UNCERTAINTY; ETHICS;
D O I
10.1002/epa2.1093
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Italy has been heavily affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. National and subnational authorities have introduced several measures to tackle the resulting crisis, including social distancing and restrictions on economic activities. However, as we will show in this contribution, such measures have sometimes resulted in uncertainty concerning the allocation of decision making powers along the central-local government continuum and regarding the exercise of administrative tasks by public authorities, thus producing conflict and variation within the policymaking and policy-delivery processes in Italy. To show this, we review the relevant events that occurred during the pandemic in the country in light both of the literature on centralization and discretion and of the principles shaping the Italian legal system. Our analysis, based on a dialogue between political science and public law, allows us to read the Italian case as a mix of inadequate institutional coordination and insufficient and unclear central guidelines which ultimately produced uncertainty, which together had a direct impact on policymakers, policy-deliverers, and citizens in general. ?? ????????????????????????????????????,????????????????,?????,?????????????,?????????????????????,??????????????,?????????????????????????????,?????????????????,??????????????,??????????????????????????????????,????????????????????????????????????????,?????????,?????????????????????? Resumen Italia se ha visto muy afectada por la pandemia de COVID-19. Las autoridades nacionales y subnacionales han adoptado varias medidas para abordar la crisis resultante, incluido el distanciamiento social y las restricciones a las actividades economicas. Sin embargo, como mostraremos, tales medidas en ocasiones han sido portadoras de incertidumbre en cuanto a la asignacion de poderes de decision a lo largo del continuo gobierno central-local y el ejercicio de tareas administrativas por parte de las autoridades publicas, produciendo asi conflictos y variaciones dentro de la politica. y procesos de ejecucion de politicas activados. Para mostrar esto, reconstruimos los hechos relevantes ocurridos durante la pandemia a la luz de la literatura sobre centralizacion y discrecion, asi como de los principios que configuran el sistema legal italiano. Nuestro analisis, basado en un dialogo entre ciencia politica y derecho publico, nos permite leer el caso italiano como una mezcla de coordinacion institucional inadecuada y claridad de directrices centrales insuficiente que finalmente produjo incertidumbre, afectando asi a los responsables politicos, a los responsables de las politicas y a los ciudadanos. en general.
引用
收藏
页码:138 / 146
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Altieri G., 2020, EMERGENZA COVID 19 P
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1992, USES DISCRETION
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1964, INSIDE BUREAUCRACY
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2011, ETHICS CRISIS MANAGE
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1945, ADM BEHAV STUDY DECI
  • [6] Are Judges Street-Level Bureaucrats? Evidence from French and Canadian Family Courts
    Biland, Emilie
    Steinmetz, Helene
    [J]. LAW AND SOCIAL INQUIRY-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BAR FOUNDATION, 2017, 42 (02): : 298 - 324
  • [7] Boin A, 2011, ETHICS PRACT, P75
  • [8] Mobilizing Policy (In)Capacity to Fight COVID-19: Understanding Variations in State Responses
    Capano, Giliberto
    Howlett, Michael
    Jarvis, Darryl S. L.
    Ramesh, M.
    Goyal, Nihit
    [J]. POLICY AND SOCIETY, 2020, 39 : 285 - 308
  • [9] ETHICS AND THE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATOR
    COHEN, S
    EIMICKE, WB
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 1995, 537 : 96 - 108
  • [10] Colfer B., 2020, EUR POLICY ANAL, V6, P203, DOI [10.1002/epa2.1096, DOI 10.1002/EPA2.1096]