Lessons from the use of a long-term energy model for consequential life cycle assessment: The BTL case

被引:48
|
作者
Menten, Fabio [1 ,2 ]
Tchung-Ming, Stephane [1 ]
Lorne, Daphne [1 ]
Bouvart, Frederique [1 ]
机构
[1] IFP Energies Nouvelles, F-92852 Rueil Malmaison, France
[2] Arts & Metiers ParisTech, Esplanade Arts & Metiers, F-33405 Talence, France
关键词
Consequential LCA; Prospective LCA; Life cycle assessment; Second generation biofuels; Advanced biofuels; TIMES model; System dynamics; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; LAND-USE; PART; SYSTEMS; EMISSIONS; BIOFUELS; CLIMATE; CARBON; LCA; METHODOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.072
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The main objective of this study is to develop a methodology adapted to the prospective environmental evaluation of actions in the energy sector. It describes how a bottom-up long-term energy model can be used in a life cycle assessment (LCA) framework. The proposed methodology is applied in a case study about the global warming impacts occurring as a consequence of the future production of synthetic diesel from biomass ("biomass to liquids"-BTL), a second-generation biofuel, in France. The results show a high sensitivity of the system-wide GHG balance to (i) the policy context and to (ii) the economic environment. Both influence the substitutions occurring within the system due to the production of BTL Under the specific conditions of this study, the consequences of introducing BTL are not clear-cut. Therefore, we focus on the lessons from the detailed analysis of the results more than in the precise-looking projections, illustrating how this type of models can be used for strategic planning (industry and policy makers). TIMES-type models allow a detailed description of the numerous technologies affected by BTL production and how these vary under different policy scenarios. Moreover, some recommendations are presented, which should contribute for a proper systematization of consequential and prospective LCA methodologies. We provide argumentation on how to define a functional unit and system boundaries that are better linked with the goal of the study. Other crucial methodological issues are also discussed: how to treat temporal aspects in such environmental evaluation and how to increase the consistency of prospective life cycle assessments. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:942 / 960
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Applying the Technology Choice Model in Consequential Life Cycle Assessment: A Case Study in the Peruvian Agricultural Sector
    Larrea-Gallegos, Gustavo
    Vazquez-Rowe, Ian
    Wiener, Hugo
    Kahhat, Ramzy
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2019, 23 (03) : 601 - 614
  • [2] Transposing lessons between different forms of consequential greenhouse gas accounting: lessons for consequential life cycle assessment, project-level accounting, and policy-level accounting
    Brander, Matthew
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 112 : 4247 - 4256
  • [3] Land Use and Geospatial Aspects in Life Cycle Assessment of Renewable Energy
    Seager, T. P.
    Miller, S. A.
    Kohn, J.
    2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, : 216 - +
  • [4] A Conceptual Review on Using Consequential Life Cycle Assessment Methodology for the Energy Sector
    Luu, Quyen Le
    Longo, Sonia
    Cellura, Maurizio
    Sanseverino, Eleonora Riva
    Cusenza, Maria Anna
    Franzitta, Vincenzo
    ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (12)
  • [5] Stochastic Technology Choice Model for Consequential Life Cycle Assessment
    Kaetelhoen, Arne
    Bardow, Andre
    Suh, Sangwon
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 50 (23) : 12575 - 12583
  • [6] On the use of different models for consequential life cycle assessment
    Yang, Yi
    Heijungs, Reinout
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2018, 23 (04) : 751 - 758
  • [7] A dynamic life cycle assessment model for long-term carbon emissions prediction of buildings: A passive building as case study
    Su, Xing
    Huang, Yixiang
    Chen, Chaoyang
    Xu, Zehan
    Tian, Shaochen
    Peng, Li
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2023, 96
  • [8] Comparative analysis of attributional corporate greenhouse gas accounting, consequential life cycle assessment, and project/policy level accounting: A bioenergy case study
    Brander, Matthew
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 167 : 1401 - 1414
  • [9] Life cycle assessment (LCA) and energy assessment of the production and use of windows in residential buildings
    Kowalczyk, Zbigniew
    Twardowski, Sebastian
    Malinowski, Mateusz
    Kubon, Maciej
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [10] Life cycle assessment of energy generation from biogas-Attributional vs. consequential approach
    Rehl, T.
    Lansche, J.
    Mueller, J.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2012, 16 (06) : 3766 - 3775