Validity and reliability of Gyko Sport for the measurement of barbell velocity on the bench-press exercise

被引:10
作者
Arede, Jorge [1 ]
Figueira, Bruno [1 ,2 ]
Gonzalo-Skok, Oliver [3 ]
Leite, Nuno [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tras Os Montes & Alto Douro, Res Ctr Sports Sci Hlth Sci & Human Dev CIDESD, Vila Real, Portugal
[2] Lithuanian Sports Univ, Fac Sport Biomed, Kaunas, Lithuania
[3] Univ San Jorge, Fac Hlth Sci, Zaragoza, Spain
关键词
Physiologic monitoring; Exercise test; Muscle strength; Resistance training; Technology; CONCURRENT VALIDITY; BASKETBALL; PERFORMANCE; WEIGHT; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.23736/S0022-4707.19.09770-6
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine the validity and reliability of the novel inertial measurement unit (named: Gyko Sport) for the measurement of barbell concentric velocity on the bench-press exercise. METHODS: Ten under-16 (U16) basketball players performed 2 repetitions of the bench press exercise with 6 different loads (40, 50, 60, 70, 80 and 90% of one repetition maximum [1-RM]; N.=120 repetitions). Mean velocity for each repetition was simultaneously recorded using the Gyko Sport and SmartCoach linear transducer. RESULTS: Results showed a very large correlation between the SmartCoach and Gyko Sport (-0.79; standard error of estimate [SEE] 0.18 m/s). Furthermore, there was a very high agreement between both devices for the measurement of the mean velocity (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]-0.774; Cronbach's alpha [alpha]=0.872; Bland-Altman Plots [R-2]-0.070). The Gyko Sport registered similar, but slightly higher values than the SmartCoach (P=0.103; mean difference 0.075 +/- 0.05 m/s). CONCLUSIONS: The results support the use of the Gyko Sport as an affordable, portable, and suitable wearable device to measure mean velocity on bench press exercise.
引用
收藏
页码:1651 / 1658
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Baechle T.R., 2008, Resistance training. Essentials of strength and conditioning, P381
[2]   Analysis of Wearable and Smartphone-Based Technologies for the Measurement of Barbell Velocity in Different Resistance Training Exercises [J].
Balsalobre-Fernandez, Carlos ;
Marchante, David ;
Baz-Valle, Eneko ;
Alonso-Molero, Ivan ;
Jimenez, Sergio L. ;
Munoz-Lopez, Mario .
FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 8
[3]   Validity and reliability of a novel iPhone app for the measurement of barbell velocity and 1RM on the bench-press exercise [J].
Balsalobre-Fernandez, Carlos ;
Marchante, David ;
Munoz-Lopez, Mario ;
Jimenez, Sergio L. .
JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2018, 36 (01) :64-70
[4]   VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE PUSH WEARABLE DEVICE TO MEASURE MOVEMENT VELOCITY DURING THE BACK SQUAT EXERCISE [J].
Balsalobre-Fernandez, Carlos ;
Kuzdub, Matt ;
Poveda-Ortiz, Pedro ;
del Campo-Vecino, Juan .
JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2016, 30 (07) :1968-1974
[5]   Validity of Various Methods for Determining Velocity, Force, and Power in the Back Squat [J].
Banyard, Harry G. ;
Nosaka, Ken ;
Sato, Kimitake ;
Haff, G. Gregory .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS PHYSIOLOGY AND PERFORMANCE, 2017, 12 (09) :1170-1176
[6]   Optimal sampling frequency in recording of resistance training exercises [J].
Bardella, Paolo ;
Carrasquilla Garcia, Irene ;
Pozzo, Marco ;
Tous-Fajardo, Julio ;
Saez de Villareal, Eduardo ;
Suarez-Arrones, Luis .
SPORTS BIOMECHANICS, 2017, 16 (01) :102-114
[7]  
BOSCO C, 1995, EXERCISE SOC J SPORT, V10, P10
[8]  
Foran B., 2007, Complete Conditioning for Basketball: Human Kinetics
[9]   Reliability and concurrent validity of the Velowin optoelectronic system to measure movement velocity during the free-weight back squat [J].
Garcia-Ramos, Amador ;
Perez-Castilla, Alejandro ;
Martin, Fernando .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCE & COACHING, 2018, 13 (05) :737-742
[10]   MEAN VELOCITY VS. MEAN PROPULSIVE VELOCITY VS. PEAK VELOCITY: WHICH VARIABLE DETERMINES BENCH PRESS RELATIVE LOAD WITH HIGHER RELIABILITY? [J].
Garcia-Ramos, Amador ;
Pestana-Melero, Francisco L. ;
Perez-Castilla, Alejandro ;
Rojas, Francisco J. ;
Haff, G. Gregory .
JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2018, 32 (05) :1273-1279