Cost-effectiveness analysis of axicabtagene ciloleucel vs. salvage chemotherapy for relapsed or refractory adult diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in China

被引:7
|
作者
Li, Na [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Bin [1 ,2 ]
Cai, Hongfu [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Ting [3 ]
Hong, Yunda [3 ]
Liu, Maobai [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Jianda [3 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Med Univ Union Hosp, Dept Pharm, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Fujian Med Univ, Sch Pharm, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Fujian Med Univ Union Hosp, Fujian Inst Hematol, Dept Hematol, Fujian Prov Key Lab Hematol, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Cost-effectiveness; CAR-T; Axicabtagene ciloleucel; R; R DLBCL; Salvage chemotherapy; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; TRANSPLANTATION; SURVIVAL; OUTCOMES; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-022-07041-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Axicabtagene ciloleucel (Axi-Cel, 2 x 10(6) CAR-T cells/kg, single intravenous injection) is a chimeric antigen receptor cell immunotherapy that exhibits favorable clinical efficacy and safety in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL). However, this treatment is expensive in China. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Axi-Cel versus salvage chemotherapy for the treatment of R/R DLBCL from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Methods A decision analysis model containing a short-term decision tree and long-term semi-Markov partitioned survival model was developed. The time horizon was 40 years and the period from 10 to 40 years was included in sensitivity analysis. The model was developed based on data from the ZUMA-1 and SCHOLAR-1 trials. Life years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), overall costs, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were estimated at a willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of US $31,320 per QALY, which is three times the gross domestic product per capita. Results The base case analysis revealed that treatment with Axi-Cel is associated with an increased overall cost of US $175,380 and improved effectiveness of 3.43 LYs and 2.61 QALYs compared to salvage chemotherapy, leading to an ICER of US $51,190 per LY and US $67,250 per QALY. The developed model is sensitive to the discount rate, utility of progression-free survival (PFS), and cost of Axi-Cel. The ICER of Axi-Cel was greater than the WTP threshold in the sensitivity and scenario analyses. To achieve cost-effectiveness, the price of Axi-Cel must be reduced by 59.19% to US $71,000. Conclusion At its current price, Axi-Cel is not likely to be a cost-effective option compared to salvage chemotherapy for adult patients with R/R DLBCL.
引用
收藏
页码:6113 / 6121
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost-effectiveness analysis of axicabtagene ciloleucel vs. salvage chemotherapy for relapsed or refractory adult diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in China
    Na Li
    Bin Zheng
    Hongfu Cai
    Ting Yang
    Yunda Hong
    Maobai Liu
    Jianda Hu
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022, 30 : 6113 - 6121
  • [2] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel vs. Tisagenlecleucel for the Management of Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in Spain
    Bastos-Oreiro, Mariana
    de las Heras, Ana
    Presa, Maria
    Casado, Miguel A.
    Pardo, Carlos
    Martin-Escudero, Victoria
    Sureda, Anna
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (03)
  • [3] Cost-effectiveness of second-line axicabtagene ciloleucel in relapsed refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
    Kambhampati, Swetha
    Saumoy, Monica
    Schneider, Yecheskel
    Serrao, Steve
    Solaimani, Pejman
    Budde, Lihua Elizabeth
    Mei, Matthew G.
    Popplewell, Leslie L.
    Siddiqi, Tanya
    Zain, Jasmine
    Forman, Stephen J.
    Kwak, Larry W.
    Rosen, Steven T.
    Danilov, V. Alexey
    Herrera, Alex F.
    Thiruvengadam, Nikhil R.
    BLOOD, 2022, 140 (19) : 2024 - 2036
  • [4] Cost-effectiveness of axicabtagene ciloleucel for adult patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma in the United States
    Roth, Joshua A.
    Sulliyan, Sean D.
    Lin, Vincent W.
    Bansal, Aasthaa
    Purdum, Anna G.
    Nayale, Lynn
    Cheng, Paul
    Ramsey, Scott D.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 21 (12) : 1238 - 1245
  • [5] Cost-effectiveness of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel and Tisagenlecleucel as Second-line or Later Therapy in Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
    Choe, Jee H.
    Abdel-Azim, Hisham
    Padula, William, V
    Abou-El-Enein, Mohamed
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (12)
  • [6] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel vs. Standard of Care in Second-Line Treatment for Relapsed/Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma in Spain
    Garcia-Sancho, Alejandro Martin
    Presa, Maria
    Pardo, Carlos
    Martin-Escudero, Victoria
    Oyaguez, Itziar
    Ortiz-Maldonado, Valentin
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (13)
  • [7] Cost-Effectiveness of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel for Adult Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma in the United States
    Oluwole, Olalekan O.
    Ray, Markqayne D.
    Rosettie, Katherine L.
    Ball, Graeme
    Jacob, Jorge
    Bilir, S. Pinar
    Patel, Anik R.
    Jacobson, Caron A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2024, 27 (08) : 1030 - 1038
  • [8] Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Tisagenlecleucel for the Treatment of Adult Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma in Japan
    Wakase, Shiho
    Teshima, Takanori
    Zhang, Jie
    Ma, Qiufei
    Fujita, Taizo
    Yang, Hongbo
    Chai, Xinglei
    Qi, Cynthia Z.
    Liu, Qing
    Wu, Eric Q.
    Igarashi, Ataru
    TRANSPLANTATION AND CELLULAR THERAPY, 2021, 27 (06): : 506.e1 - 506.e10
  • [9] Cost-effectiveness analysis of axicabtagene ciloleucel as a second-line treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in China and the United States
    Li, Na
    Lei, Jianying
    Zhang, Jiahao
    Cai, Hongfu
    Zheng, Bin
    Yang, Ting
    Liu, Maobai
    Hu, Jianda
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN HEMATOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [10] Safety evaluation of axicabtagene ciloleucel for relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma
    Nath, Karthik
    Wudhikarn, Kitsada
    Alarcon Tomas, Ana
    Perales, Miguel-Angel
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, 2023, 22 (01) : 5 - 15