OpenKBP: The open-access knowledge-based planning grand challenge and dataset

被引:65
|
作者
Babier, Aaron [1 ]
Zhang, Binghao [1 ]
Mahmood, Rafid [1 ]
Moore, Kevin L. [2 ]
Purdie, Thomas G. [3 ,4 ]
McNiven, Andrea L. [3 ,4 ]
Chan, Timothy C. Y. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, 5 Kings Coll Rd, Toronto, ON M5S 3G8, Canada
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Radiat Oncol, 3855 Hlth Sci Dr, La Jolla, CA 92104 USA
[3] UHN Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Radiat Med Program, 610 Univ Ave, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Radiat Oncol, 148-150 Coll St, Toronto, ON M5S 3S2, Canada
[5] Techna Inst Adv Technol Hlth, 124-100 Coll St, Toronto, ON M5G 1P5, Canada
关键词
automated planning; computer vision; equity; diversity; and inclusion; knowledge-based planning; machine learning; public dataset; DOSE PREDICTION; AT-RISK; OPTIMIZATION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1002/mp.14845
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose To advance fair and consistent comparisons of dose prediction methods for knowledge-based planning (KBP) in radiation therapy research. Methods We hosted OpenKBP, a 2020 AAPM Grand Challenge, and challenged participants to develop the best method for predicting the dose of contoured computed tomography (CT) images. The models were evaluated according to two separate scores: (a) dose score, which evaluates the full three-dimensional (3D) dose distributions, and (b) dose-volume histogram (DVH) score, which evaluates a set DVH metrics. We used these scores to quantify the quality of the models based on their out-of-sample predictions. To develop and test their models, participants were given the data of 340 patients who were treated for head-and-neck cancer with radiation therapy. The data were partitioned into training (n=200), validation (n=40), and testing (n=100) datasets. All participants performed training and validation with the corresponding datasets during the first (validation) phase of the Challenge. In the second (testing) phase, the participants used their model on the testing data to quantify the out-of-sample performance, which was hidden from participants and used to determine the final competition ranking. Participants also responded to a survey to summarize their models. Results The Challenge attracted 195 participants from 28 countries, and 73 of those participants formed 44 teams in the validation phase, which received a total of 1750 submissions. The testing phase garnered submissions from 28 of those teams, which represents 28 unique prediction methods. On average, over the course of the validation phase, participants improved the dose and DVH scores of their models by a factor of 2.7 and 5.7, respectively. In the testing phase one model achieved the best dose score (2.429) and DVH score (1.478), which were both significantly better than the dose score (2.564) and the DVH score (1.529) that was achieved by the runner-up models. Lastly, many of the top performing teams reported that they used generalizable techniques (e.g., ensembles) to achieve higher performance than their competition. Conclusion OpenKBP is the first competition for knowledge-based planning research. The Challenge helped launch the first platform that enables researchers to compare KBP prediction methods fairly and consistently using a large open-source dataset and standardized metrics. OpenKBP has also democratized KBP research by making it accessible to everyone, which should help accelerate the progress of KBP research. The OpenKBP datasets are available publicly to help benchmark future KBP research.
引用
收藏
页码:5549 / 5561
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A knowledge-based engineering system for assembly sequence planning
    Hsu, Yung-Yuan
    Tai, Pei-Hao
    Wang, Min-Wen
    Chen, Wen-Chin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 55 (5-8) : 763 - 782
  • [42] A knowledge-based approach to automated planning for hepatocellular carcinoma
    Zhang, Yujie
    Li, Tingting
    Xiao, Han
    Ji, Weixing
    Guo, Ming
    Zeng, Zhaochong
    Zhang, Jianying
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 19 (01): : 50 - 59
  • [43] Knowledge-based IMRT treatment planning for prostate cancer
    Chanyavanich, Vorakarn
    Das, Shiva K.
    Lee, William R.
    Lo, Joseph Y.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (05) : 2515 - 2522
  • [44] An Ensemble Approach to Knowledge-Based Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning
    Zhang, Jiahan
    Wu, Q. Jackie
    Xie, Tianyi
    Sheng, Yang
    Yin, Fang-Fang
    Ge, Yaorong
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2018, 8
  • [45] Knowledge-based planning for fully automated radiation therapy treatment planning of 10 different cancer sites
    Chung, Christine, V
    Khan, Meena S.
    Olanrewaju, Adenike
    Pham, Mary
    Nguyen, Quyen T.
    Patel, Tina
    Das, Prajnan
    O'Reilly, Michael S.
    Reed, Valerie K.
    Jhingran, Anuja
    Simonds, Hannah
    Ludmir, Ethan B.
    Hoffman, Karen E.
    Naidoo, Komeela
    Parkes, Jeannette
    Aggarwal, Ajay
    Mayo, Lauren L.
    Shah, Shalin J.
    Tang, Chad
    Beadle, Beth M.
    Wetter, Julie
    Walker, Gary
    Hughes, Simon
    Mullassery, Vinod
    Skett, Stephen
    Thomas, Christopher
    Zhang, Lifei
    Nguyen, Son
    Mumme, Raymond P.
    Douglas, Raphael J.
    Baroudi, Hana
    Court, Laurence E.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2025, 202
  • [46] Knowledge-based process planning for economical re-scheduling in production control
    Denkena, Berend
    Dittrich, Marc-Andre
    Stamm, Siebo Claas
    Prasanthan, Vannila
    52ND CIRP CONFERENCE ON MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS (CMS), 2019, 81 : 980 - 985
  • [47] Disseminating Knowledge: From Potential to Reality-New Open-Access Journals Collide With Convention
    Harzing, Anne-Wil
    Adler, Nancy J.
    ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT LEARNING & EDUCATION, 2016, 15 (01) : 140 - 156
  • [48] Evaluation of a highly refined prediction model in knowledge-based volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for cervical cancer
    Wang, Mingli
    Gu, Huikuan
    Hu, Jiang
    Liang, Jian
    Xu, Sisi
    Qi, Zhenyu
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [49] Evaluation of knowledge-based planning models for male pelvic CBCT-based online adaptive radiotherapy on conventional linear accelerators
    Tegtmeier, Riley C.
    Clouser, Edward L.
    Laughlin, Brady S.
    Toesca, Diego A. Santos
    Flakus, Mattison J.
    Bashir, Sara
    Kutyreff, Christopher J.
    Hobbis, Dean
    Harrington, Daniel P.
    Smetanick, Jennifer L.
    Yu, Nathan Y.
    Vargas, Carlos E.
    James, Sarah E.
    Rwigema, Jean-Claude M.
    Rong, Yi
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 25 (09):
  • [50] Reducing variability among treatment machines using knowledge-based planning for head and neck, pancreatic, and rectal cancer
    Hirashima, Hideaki
    Nakamura, Mitsuhiro
    Mukumoto, Nobutaka
    Ashida, Ryo
    Fujii, Kota
    Nakamura, Kiyonao
    Nakajima, Aya
    Sakanaka, Katsuyuki
    Yoshimura, Michio
    Mizowaki, Takashi
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 22 (07): : 245 - 254