OpenKBP: The open-access knowledge-based planning grand challenge and dataset

被引:71
作者
Babier, Aaron [1 ]
Zhang, Binghao [1 ]
Mahmood, Rafid [1 ]
Moore, Kevin L. [2 ]
Purdie, Thomas G. [3 ,4 ]
McNiven, Andrea L. [3 ,4 ]
Chan, Timothy C. Y. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, 5 Kings Coll Rd, Toronto, ON M5S 3G8, Canada
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Radiat Oncol, 3855 Hlth Sci Dr, La Jolla, CA 92104 USA
[3] UHN Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Radiat Med Program, 610 Univ Ave, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Radiat Oncol, 148-150 Coll St, Toronto, ON M5S 3S2, Canada
[5] Techna Inst Adv Technol Hlth, 124-100 Coll St, Toronto, ON M5G 1P5, Canada
关键词
automated planning; computer vision; equity; diversity; and inclusion; knowledge-based planning; machine learning; public dataset; DOSE PREDICTION; AT-RISK; OPTIMIZATION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1002/mp.14845
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose To advance fair and consistent comparisons of dose prediction methods for knowledge-based planning (KBP) in radiation therapy research. Methods We hosted OpenKBP, a 2020 AAPM Grand Challenge, and challenged participants to develop the best method for predicting the dose of contoured computed tomography (CT) images. The models were evaluated according to two separate scores: (a) dose score, which evaluates the full three-dimensional (3D) dose distributions, and (b) dose-volume histogram (DVH) score, which evaluates a set DVH metrics. We used these scores to quantify the quality of the models based on their out-of-sample predictions. To develop and test their models, participants were given the data of 340 patients who were treated for head-and-neck cancer with radiation therapy. The data were partitioned into training (n=200), validation (n=40), and testing (n=100) datasets. All participants performed training and validation with the corresponding datasets during the first (validation) phase of the Challenge. In the second (testing) phase, the participants used their model on the testing data to quantify the out-of-sample performance, which was hidden from participants and used to determine the final competition ranking. Participants also responded to a survey to summarize their models. Results The Challenge attracted 195 participants from 28 countries, and 73 of those participants formed 44 teams in the validation phase, which received a total of 1750 submissions. The testing phase garnered submissions from 28 of those teams, which represents 28 unique prediction methods. On average, over the course of the validation phase, participants improved the dose and DVH scores of their models by a factor of 2.7 and 5.7, respectively. In the testing phase one model achieved the best dose score (2.429) and DVH score (1.478), which were both significantly better than the dose score (2.564) and the DVH score (1.529) that was achieved by the runner-up models. Lastly, many of the top performing teams reported that they used generalizable techniques (e.g., ensembles) to achieve higher performance than their competition. Conclusion OpenKBP is the first competition for knowledge-based planning research. The Challenge helped launch the first platform that enables researchers to compare KBP prediction methods fairly and consistently using a large open-source dataset and standardized metrics. OpenKBP has also democratized KBP research by making it accessible to everyone, which should help accelerate the progress of KBP research. The OpenKBP datasets are available publicly to help benchmark future KBP research.
引用
收藏
页码:5549 / 5561
页数:13
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Defining the noninferiority margin and analysing noninferiority: An overview [J].
Althunian, Turki A. ;
de Boer, Anthonius ;
Groenwold, Rolf H. H. ;
Klungel, Olaf H. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 83 (08) :1636-1642
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, ARXIV161107004
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, INT CONF 3D VISION, DOI DOI 10.1109/3DV.2016.79
[4]   Predicting dose-volume histograms for organs-at-risk in IMRT planning [J].
Appenzoller, Lindsey M. ;
Michalski, Jeff M. ;
Thorstad, Wade L. ;
Mutic, Sasa ;
Moore, Kevin L. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (12) :7446-7461
[5]   Expanding global access to radiotherapy [J].
Atun, Rifat ;
Jaffray, David A. ;
Barton, Michael B. ;
Bray, Freddie ;
Baumann, Michael ;
Vikram, Bhadrasain ;
Hanna, Timothy P. ;
Knaul, Felicia M. ;
Lievens, Yolande ;
Lui, Tracey Y. M. ;
Milosevic, Michael ;
O'Sullivan, Brian ;
Rodin, Danielle L. ;
Rosenblatt, Eduardo ;
Van Dyk, Jacob ;
Yap, Mei Ling ;
Zubizarreta, Eduardo ;
Gospodarowicz, Mary .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2015, 16 (10) :1153-1186
[6]   The importance of evaluating the complete automated knowledge-based planning pipeline [J].
Babier, Aaron ;
Mahmood, Rafid ;
McNiven, Andrea L. ;
Diamant, Adam ;
Chan, Timothy C. Y. .
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 72 :73-79
[7]   Knowledge-based automated planning with three-dimensional generative adversarial networks [J].
Babier, Aaron ;
Mahmood, Rafid ;
McNiven, Andrea L. ;
Diamant, Adam ;
Chan, Timothy C. Y. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (02) :297-306
[8]   Inverse optimization of objective function weights for treatment planning using clinical dose-volume histograms [J].
Babier, Aaron ;
Boutilier, Justin J. ;
Sharpe, Michael B. ;
McNiven, Andrea L. ;
Chan, Timothy C. Y. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 63 (10)
[9]   Knowledge-based automated planning for oropharyngeal cancer [J].
Babier, Aaron ;
Boutilier, Justin J. ;
McNiven, Andrea L. ;
Chan, Timothy C. Y. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (07) :2875-2883
[10]  
Bosch W.R., 2015, Data from head-neck cetuximab