OpenKBP: The open-access knowledge-based planning grand challenge and dataset

被引:65
|
作者
Babier, Aaron [1 ]
Zhang, Binghao [1 ]
Mahmood, Rafid [1 ]
Moore, Kevin L. [2 ]
Purdie, Thomas G. [3 ,4 ]
McNiven, Andrea L. [3 ,4 ]
Chan, Timothy C. Y. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, 5 Kings Coll Rd, Toronto, ON M5S 3G8, Canada
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Radiat Oncol, 3855 Hlth Sci Dr, La Jolla, CA 92104 USA
[3] UHN Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Radiat Med Program, 610 Univ Ave, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Radiat Oncol, 148-150 Coll St, Toronto, ON M5S 3S2, Canada
[5] Techna Inst Adv Technol Hlth, 124-100 Coll St, Toronto, ON M5G 1P5, Canada
关键词
automated planning; computer vision; equity; diversity; and inclusion; knowledge-based planning; machine learning; public dataset; DOSE PREDICTION; AT-RISK; OPTIMIZATION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1002/mp.14845
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose To advance fair and consistent comparisons of dose prediction methods for knowledge-based planning (KBP) in radiation therapy research. Methods We hosted OpenKBP, a 2020 AAPM Grand Challenge, and challenged participants to develop the best method for predicting the dose of contoured computed tomography (CT) images. The models were evaluated according to two separate scores: (a) dose score, which evaluates the full three-dimensional (3D) dose distributions, and (b) dose-volume histogram (DVH) score, which evaluates a set DVH metrics. We used these scores to quantify the quality of the models based on their out-of-sample predictions. To develop and test their models, participants were given the data of 340 patients who were treated for head-and-neck cancer with radiation therapy. The data were partitioned into training (n=200), validation (n=40), and testing (n=100) datasets. All participants performed training and validation with the corresponding datasets during the first (validation) phase of the Challenge. In the second (testing) phase, the participants used their model on the testing data to quantify the out-of-sample performance, which was hidden from participants and used to determine the final competition ranking. Participants also responded to a survey to summarize their models. Results The Challenge attracted 195 participants from 28 countries, and 73 of those participants formed 44 teams in the validation phase, which received a total of 1750 submissions. The testing phase garnered submissions from 28 of those teams, which represents 28 unique prediction methods. On average, over the course of the validation phase, participants improved the dose and DVH scores of their models by a factor of 2.7 and 5.7, respectively. In the testing phase one model achieved the best dose score (2.429) and DVH score (1.478), which were both significantly better than the dose score (2.564) and the DVH score (1.529) that was achieved by the runner-up models. Lastly, many of the top performing teams reported that they used generalizable techniques (e.g., ensembles) to achieve higher performance than their competition. Conclusion OpenKBP is the first competition for knowledge-based planning research. The Challenge helped launch the first platform that enables researchers to compare KBP prediction methods fairly and consistently using a large open-source dataset and standardized metrics. OpenKBP has also democratized KBP research by making it accessible to everyone, which should help accelerate the progress of KBP research. The OpenKBP datasets are available publicly to help benchmark future KBP research.
引用
收藏
页码:5549 / 5561
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] OpenKBP-Opt: an international and reproducible evaluation of 76 knowledge-based planning pipelines
    Babier, Aaron
    Mahmood, Rafid
    Zhang, Binghao
    Alves, Victor G. L.
    Barragan-Montero, Ana Maria
    Beaudry, Joel
    Cardenas, Carlos E.
    Chang, Yankui
    Chen, Zijie
    Chun, Jaehee
    Diaz, Kelly
    Eraso, Harold David
    Faustmann, Erik
    Gaj, Sibaji
    Gay, Skylar
    Gronberg, Mary
    Guo, Bingqi
    He, Junjun
    Heilemann, Gerd
    Hira, Sanchit
    Huang, Yuliang
    Ji, Fuxin
    Jiang, Dashan
    Giraldo, Jean Carlo Jimenez
    Lee, Hoyeon
    Lian, Jun
    Liu, Shuolin
    Liu, Keng-Chi
    Marrugo, Jose
    Miki, Kentaro
    Nakamura, Kunio
    Netherton, Tucker
    Dan Nguyen
    Nourzadeh, Hamidreza
    Osman, Alexander F., I
    Peng, Zhao
    Quinto Munoz, Jose Dario
    Ramsl, Christian
    Rhee, Dong Joo
    Rodriguez, Juan David
    Shan, Hongming
    Siebers, Jeffrey, V
    Soomro, Mumtaz H.
    Sun, Kay
    Usuga Hoyos, Andres
    Valderrama, Carlos
    Verbeek, Rob
    Wang, Enpei
    Willems, Siri
    Wu, Qi
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2022, 67 (18)
  • [2] Knowledge-based automated planning with three-dimensional generative adversarial networks
    Babier, Aaron
    Mahmood, Rafid
    McNiven, Andrea L.
    Diamant, Adam
    Chan, Timothy C. Y.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (02) : 297 - 306
  • [3] An Open-Access Experimental Dataset for Breast Microwave Imaging
    Reimer, Tyson
    Krenkevich, Jordan
    Pistorius, Stephen
    2020 14TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION (EUCAP 2020), 2020,
  • [4] The importance of evaluating the complete automated knowledge-based planning pipeline
    Babier, Aaron
    Mahmood, Rafid
    McNiven, Andrea L.
    Diamant, Adam
    Chan, Timothy C. Y.
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 72 : 73 - 79
  • [5] Knowledge-based automated planning for oropharyngeal cancer
    Babier, Aaron
    Boutilier, Justin J.
    McNiven, Andrea L.
    Chan, Timothy C. Y.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (07) : 2875 - 2883
  • [6] Knowledge-based isocenter selection in radiosurgery planning
    Berdyshev, A.
    Cevik, M.
    Aleman, D.
    Nordstrom, H.
    Riad, S.
    Lee, Y.
    Sahgal, A.
    Ruschin, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (09) : 3913 - 3927
  • [7] Knowledge-based planning for intensity-modulated radiation therapy: A review of data-driven approaches
    Ge, Yaorong
    Wu, Q. Jackie
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : 2760 - 2775
  • [8] Knowledge-based radiation treatment planning: A data-driven method survey
    Momin, Shadab
    Fu, Yabo
    Lei, Yang
    Roper, Justin
    Bradley, Jeffrey D.
    Curran, Walter J.
    Liu, Tian
    Yang, Xiaofeng
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 22 (08): : 16 - 44
  • [9] Knowledge-based planning for Gamma Knife
    Zhang, Binghao
    Babier, Aaron
    Ruschin, Mark
    Chan, Timothy C. Y.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 51 (05) : 3207 - 3219
  • [10] sPlotOpen - An environmentally balanced, open-access, global dataset of vegetation plots
    Sabatini, Francesco Maria
    Lenoir, Jonathan
    Hattab, Tarek
    Arnst, Elise Aimee
    Chytry, Milan
    Dengler, Juergen
    De Ruffray, Patrice
    Hennekens, Stephan M.
    Jandt, Ute
    Jansen, Florian
    Jimenez-Alfaro, Borja
    Kattge, Jens
    Levesley, Aurora
    Pillar, Valerio D.
    Purschke, Oliver
    Sandel, Brody
    Sultana, Fahmida
    Aavik, Tsipe
    Acic, Svetlana
    Acosta, Alicia T. R.
    Agrillo, Emiliano
    Alvarez, Miguel
    Apostolova, Iva
    Arfin Khan, Mohammed A. S.
    Arroyo, Luzmila
    Attorre, Fabio
    Aubin, Isabelle
    Banerjee, Arindam
    Bauters, Marijn
    Bergeron, Yves
    Bergmeier, Erwin
    Biurrun, Idoia
    Bjorkman, Anne D.
    Bonari, Gianmaria
    Bondareva, Viktoria
    Brunet, Jorg
    Carni, Andraz
    Casella, Laura
    Cayuela, Luis
    Cerny, Tomas
    Chepinoga, Victor
    Csiky, Janos
    Custerevska, Renata
    De Bie, Els
    de Gasper, Andre Luis
    De Sanctis, Michele
    Dimopoulos, Panayotis
    Dolezal, Jiri
    Dziuba, Tetiana
    El-Sheikh, Mohamed Abd El-Rouf Mousa
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2021, 30 (09): : 1740 - 1764