R&D for Quality Improvement and Network Externalities

被引:9
作者
Lambertini, Luca [1 ,2 ]
Orsini, Raimondello [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Econ, I-40125 Bologna, Italy
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Fac Econ & Econometr, ENCORE, NL-1018 WB Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Monopoly; Network externality; Product quality; MONOPOLY;
D O I
10.1007/s11067-007-9034-7
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We investigate the bearings of network externalities on product quality improvements requiring costly R&D investments. The model considers the dynamic behaviour of a monopolist alternatively maximising profits or social welfare. On the one hand, we confirm much of the acquired wisdom from the static literature on the same topic, about the arising of quality undersupply at the private optimum. On the other, we show that the monopoly optimum requires specific viability conditions, while the social optimum is always viable. We also show that the presence of network externalities affects the optimal investment behaviour of the profit-seeking firm but not that of a benevolent planner, who serves all consumers from the outset.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 124
页数:12
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], EC NETWORK IND
[2]   MONOPOLY AND QUALITY DISTORTION - EFFECTS AND REMEDIES [J].
BESANKO, D ;
DONNENFELD, S ;
WHITE, LJ .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1987, 102 (04) :743-767
[4]   Monopoly pricing with network externalities [J].
Cabral, LMB ;
Salant, DJ ;
Woroch, GA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 1999, 17 (02) :199-214
[5]   MULTIPRODUCT DUOPOLISTS [J].
CHAMPSAUR, P ;
ROCHET, JC .
ECONOMETRICA, 1989, 57 (03) :533-557
[6]  
Eisner R., 1963, IMPACTS MONETARY POL
[7]  
EVANS GC, 1924, AM MATH MONTHLY, V31, P75
[8]   DYNAMIC OPTIMAL-CONTROL MODELS IN ADVERTISING - RECENT DEVELOPMENTS [J].
FEICHTINGER, G ;
HARTL, RF ;
SETHI, SP .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1994, 40 (02) :195-226
[9]  
GABSZEWICZ JJ, 1986, J ECON THEORY, V39, P273
[10]   MONOPOLY, PRODUCT DIFFERENTIATION AND ECONOMIC WELFARE [J].
ITOH, M .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 1983, 31 (01) :88-104