Does India have subnational welfare regimes? The role of state governments in shaping social policy

被引:19
作者
Tillin, Louise [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Kings India Inst, London, England
关键词
welfare state; welfare regime; social policy; India; subnational; federalism; RIGHTS AGENDA; POLITICS; CLIENTELIST; FEDERALISM; BRAZIL;
D O I
10.1080/21622671.2021.1928541
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
This article asks whether state governments in India had developed sufficient autonomy during the era of multi-party fragmentation (1989-2014) to determine and implement their own distinctive policy agendas in the field of social policy. It uses cluster analysis to look for variation in the welfare regimes of state governments within India's federal system. Employing the metrics of (de)commodification and defamilialization commonly used in the comparative cross-national literature on welfare regimes to assess the extent to which public welfare provision reduces dependence on market forces and family structures, the paper finds that India's states cluster in ways that suggest the existence of distinctive subnational welfare regimes rather than straightforward variation within a national welfare regime. The analysis challenges the national-level bias inherent in previous studies of comparative welfare regimes and offers insights into the operation of regional autonomy within the domain of social policy in India's federal system.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 102
页数:17
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Global Welfare Regimes A Cluster Analysis [J].
Abu Sharkh, Miriam ;
Gough, Ian .
GLOBAL SOCIAL POLICY, 2010, 10 (01) :27-58
[2]  
Agarwala R, 2013, CAMB STUD CONTENT, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139198738
[3]   "One nation," BJP, and the future of Indian federalism [J].
Aiyar, Yamini ;
Tillin, Louise .
INDIA REVIEW, 2020, 19 (02) :117-135
[4]   The centralization vs decentralization tug of war and the emerging narrative of fiscal federalism for social policy in India [J].
Aiyar, Yamini ;
Kapur, Avani .
REGIONAL AND FEDERAL STUDIES, 2019, 29 (02) :187-217
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, STATES DEV WORLD
[6]  
Barrientos A, 2013, SOCIAL ASSISTANCE IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139856058
[7]  
Bhagwati J., 2014, WHY GROWTH MATTERS
[8]   MIXTURE MODEL TESTS OF CLUSTER-ANALYSIS - ACCURACY OF 4 AGGLOMERATIVE HIERARCHICAL METHODS [J].
BLASHFIELD, RK .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1976, 83 (03) :377-388
[9]   The political prioritization of welfare in India: Comparing the public distribution system in Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand [J].
Chhotray, Vasudha ;
Adhikari, Anindita ;
Bahuguna, Vidushi .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 128
[10]   The BJP's Welfare Schemes: Did They Make a Difference in the 2019 Elections? [J].
Deshpande, Rajeshwari ;
Tillin, Louise ;
Kailash, K. K. .
STUDIES IN INDIAN POLITICS, 2019, 7 (02) :219-233