Safety of modified extended right hepatectomy in living liver donors

被引:18
|
作者
Cho, Eung-Ho [1 ]
Suh, Kyung-Suk [1 ]
Lee, Hae W. [1 ]
Shin, Woo Y. [1 ]
Yi, Nam-Joon [1 ]
Lee, Kuhn U. [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Coll Med, Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Surg, Seoul 110744, South Korea
关键词
living donor liver transplantation; middle hepatic vein;
D O I
10.1111/j.1432-2277.2007.00520.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), the standard right graft has been adopted by many centers to meet the metabolic demands of large recipients. In conventional right liver graft, congestion at anterior section may be problematic especially when graft volume is insufficient. We previously introduced a technical aspect of modified extended right hepatectomy (MERH), in which the middle hepatic vein was excavated by preserving the entire segment 4 (Sg4) to the donor. In this report, we investigated the safety of donors who received MERH. Between August 2002 and July 2005, 97 donors underwent right liver donation. MERH was considered when remnant-left liver volume exceeded 35% of whole liver. Eighteen donors underwent MERH (MERH group, n =18). We compared the clinical outcomes of MERH group with those of donors who underwent conventional right hepatectomy (RH) with remnant liver volume exceeding 35% (RH group, n = 37). No donor mortality occurred. No intra-operative transfusion and no re-operation were performed. There were no differences in operative time (290.8 min in MERH group vs. 297.0 min in RH group, respectively), blood loss (453.3 ml vs. 426.5 ml), and postoperative hospital stay (12.5 days vs. 12.8 days) between the two groups (P > 0.05). Period of drain removal was longer in MERH group (12.5 days vs. 9.4 days, P < 0.05). But, there was no difference in complication rate between the two groups (11/18 vs. 23/37, P > 0.05). Computed tomography scan showed that congestion of Sg4 was occurred in 13 out of 18 MERH donors in early postoperative period, but all recovered at 4 months. The regeneration of the remnant liver after MERH and RH were similar (209.8% vs. 200.0% at 4 months, P > 0.05). Our results show that MERH did not impair recovery or liver regeneration in donors, and indicate that MERH can be safely done in adult LDLT when the remnant liver exceeds 35%.
引用
收藏
页码:779 / 783
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] TRANSPLANTATION Minimizing the risks for living donors of right lobe liver grafts
    Egawa, Hiroto
    NATURE REVIEWS GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2011, 8 (05) : S251 - 252
  • [22] Laparoscopic right hepatectomy for living donor
    Kwon, Choon Hyuck David
    Choi, Gyu-Seong
    Joh, Jae-Won
    CURRENT OPINION IN ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 24 (02) : 167 - 174
  • [23] Safety limit of the extent of hepatectomy for rats with moderately fatty liver: Experimental study concerning living liver donor safety
    Morioka, D
    Watanabe, K
    Makino, H
    Saito, S
    Ueda, M
    Kubota, T
    Sekido, H
    Matsuo, KI
    Ichikawa, Y
    Endo, I
    Togo, S
    Shimada, H
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2006, 21 (02) : 367 - 373
  • [24] Effect of Donor Right Hepatectomy on Splenic Volume and Platelet Count for Living Donor Liver Transplantation
    Say-June Kim
    Gun-Hyung Na
    Ho-Joong Choi
    Youngkyoung You
    Dong-Goo Kim
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2013, 17 : 1576 - 1583
  • [25] Low residual volume in donors for living donor liver transplantation, donor safety
    Abdel Hamid, Mohamed
    Abd El Baset, Hany
    Taalat, Mahmoud
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 39 (02) : 443 - 450
  • [26] Effect of Donor Right Hepatectomy on Splenic Volume and Platelet Count for Living Donor Liver Transplantation
    Kim, Say-June
    Na, Gun-Hyung
    Choi, Ho-Joong
    You, ngkyoung
    Kim, Dong-Goo
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2013, 17 (09) : 1576 - 1583
  • [27] Quality of life of liver donors following donor hepatectomy
    Chandran B.
    Bharathan V.K.
    Shaji Mathew J.
    Amma B.S.P.T.
    Gopalakrishnan U.
    Balakrishnan D.
    Menon R.N.
    Dhar P.
    Vayoth S.O.
    Surendran S.
    Indian Journal of Gastroenterology, 2017, 36 (2) : 92 - 98
  • [28] Donor Safety and Risk Factors of Pure Laparoscopic Living Donor Right Hepatectomy: A Korean Multicenter Study
    Kim, Sang-Hoon
    Kim, Ki-Hun
    Cho, Hwui-Dong
    Suh, Kyung-Suk
    Hong, Suk Kyun
    Lee, Kwang-Woong
    Choi, Gyu-Seong
    Kim, Jong Man
    David, Kwon Choon Hyuck
    Cho, Jai Young
    Han, Ho-Seong
    Han, Jaryung
    Han, Young Seok
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2023, 278 (06) : E1198 - E1203
  • [29] How Has Virtual Hepatectomy Changed the Practice of Liver Surgery? Experience of 1194 Virtual Hepatectomy Before Liver Resection and Living Donor Liver Transplantation
    Mise, Yoshihiro
    Hasegawa, Kiyoshi
    Satou, Shouichi
    Shindoh, Junichi
    Miki, Kenji
    Akamatsu, Nobuhisa
    Arita, Junichi
    Kaneko, Junichi
    Sakamoto, Yoshihiro
    Kokudo, Norihiro
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2018, 268 (01) : 127 - 133
  • [30] The safety of the donor operation in living-donor liver transplantation: an analysis of 45 donors
    Shoji, M
    Ohkohchi, N
    Fujimori, K
    Koyamada, N
    Sekiguchi, S
    Kawagishi, N
    Tsukamoto, S
    Shirahata, Y
    Sato, K
    Satomi, S
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 16 (07) : 461 - 464