Safety of modified extended right hepatectomy in living liver donors

被引:18
|
作者
Cho, Eung-Ho [1 ]
Suh, Kyung-Suk [1 ]
Lee, Hae W. [1 ]
Shin, Woo Y. [1 ]
Yi, Nam-Joon [1 ]
Lee, Kuhn U. [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Coll Med, Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Surg, Seoul 110744, South Korea
关键词
living donor liver transplantation; middle hepatic vein;
D O I
10.1111/j.1432-2277.2007.00520.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), the standard right graft has been adopted by many centers to meet the metabolic demands of large recipients. In conventional right liver graft, congestion at anterior section may be problematic especially when graft volume is insufficient. We previously introduced a technical aspect of modified extended right hepatectomy (MERH), in which the middle hepatic vein was excavated by preserving the entire segment 4 (Sg4) to the donor. In this report, we investigated the safety of donors who received MERH. Between August 2002 and July 2005, 97 donors underwent right liver donation. MERH was considered when remnant-left liver volume exceeded 35% of whole liver. Eighteen donors underwent MERH (MERH group, n =18). We compared the clinical outcomes of MERH group with those of donors who underwent conventional right hepatectomy (RH) with remnant liver volume exceeding 35% (RH group, n = 37). No donor mortality occurred. No intra-operative transfusion and no re-operation were performed. There were no differences in operative time (290.8 min in MERH group vs. 297.0 min in RH group, respectively), blood loss (453.3 ml vs. 426.5 ml), and postoperative hospital stay (12.5 days vs. 12.8 days) between the two groups (P > 0.05). Period of drain removal was longer in MERH group (12.5 days vs. 9.4 days, P < 0.05). But, there was no difference in complication rate between the two groups (11/18 vs. 23/37, P > 0.05). Computed tomography scan showed that congestion of Sg4 was occurred in 13 out of 18 MERH donors in early postoperative period, but all recovered at 4 months. The regeneration of the remnant liver after MERH and RH were similar (209.8% vs. 200.0% at 4 months, P > 0.05). Our results show that MERH did not impair recovery or liver regeneration in donors, and indicate that MERH can be safely done in adult LDLT when the remnant liver exceeds 35%.
引用
收藏
页码:779 / 783
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Safety Evaluation of Donors when Performing Modified Extended Right Lobe Hepatectomy in ALDLT
    Chen Yongjun
    Peng Chenghong
    Shen Baiyong
    Zhan Qian
    Deng Xiaxing
    Yang Weiping
    Yan Jiqi
    Li Hongwei
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 57 (99-100) : 598 - 604
  • [2] Outcome of Right Hepatectomy for Living Liver Donors: A Single Egyptian Center Experience
    Tarek Salah
    Ahmad M. Sultan
    Omar M. Fathy
    Mohammed M. Elshobary
    Nabieh A. Elghawalby
    Ahmed Sultan
    Amr M. Yassen
    Walid M. R. Elsarraf
    Mohammed Elmorshedi
    Mohammed F. Elsaadany
    Usama A. Shiha
    M. Abdel Wahab
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2012, 16 : 1181 - 1188
  • [3] Respiratory complications:: A major concern after right hepatectomy in living liver donors
    Dondero, F
    Taillé, C
    Mal, H
    Sommacale, D
    Sauvanet, A
    Farges, O
    Francoz, C
    Durand, F
    Delefosse, D
    Denninger, MH
    Vilgrain, V
    Marrash-Chahla, R
    Fournier, M
    Belghiti, J
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 81 (02) : 181 - 186
  • [4] Outcome of Right Hepatectomy for Living Liver Donors: A Single Egyptian Center Experience
    Salah, Tarek
    Sultan, Ahmad M.
    Fathy, Omar M.
    Elshobary, Mohammed M.
    Elghawalby, Nabieh A.
    Sultan, Ahmed
    Yassen, Amr M.
    Elsarraf, Walid M. R.
    Elmorshedi, Mohammed
    Elsaadany, Mohammed F.
    Shiha, Usama A.
    Wahab, M. Abdel
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2012, 16 (06) : 1181 - 1188
  • [5] Clinical significance of right hepatectomy along the main portal fissure on donors in living donor liver transplantation
    Kim, Bong-Wan
    Park, Yong-Keun
    Xu, Weiguang
    Wang, Hee-Jung
    Lee, Jae-Myeong
    Lee, Kwangil
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 25 (10) : 1072 - 1083
  • [6] Remnant left liver size and recovery of living right liver donors
    Fong, Yuen Ki
    Chan, See Ching
    Cheung, Tan To
    Dai, Wing Chiu
    Chok, Kenneth S. H.
    Chan, Albert C. Y.
    Sharr, William W.
    Lo, Chung Mau
    HEPATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 7 (02) : 734 - 740
  • [7] Safety of donor right hepatectomy for adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation
    Itamoto, T
    Emoto, K
    Mitsuta, H
    Fukuda, S
    Ohdan, H
    Tashiro, H
    Asahara, T
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 19 (03) : 177 - 183
  • [8] Impact of Graft Type on Remnant Liver Regeneration: Right Hepatectomy Versus Extended Right Hepatectomy
    Ju, M. K.
    Choi, G. H.
    Joo, D. J.
    Hur, K. H.
    Choi, J.
    Kim, M. S.
    Kim, S. I.
    Kim, Y. S.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2010, 42 (10) : 4286 - 4288
  • [9] Selection of Safe Donors for Living Donor Liver Transplant Using Extended Right Lobe Graft
    Hong, Sung Yeon
    Kim, Taegyu
    Kim, Bong -Wan
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2023, 55 (01) : 30 - 37
  • [10] Risk of venous congestion in live donors of extended right liver graft
    Radtke, Arnold
    Sgourakis, George
    Molmenti, Ernesto P.
    Beckebaum, Susanne
    Cicinnati, Vito R.
    Schmidt, Hartmut
    Peitgen, Heinz-Otto
    Broelsch, Christoph E.
    Malago, Massimo
    Schroeder, Tobias
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 21 (19) : 6008 - 6017