DESIGN OF A SOCIAL SYSTEM DECISION-MAKING MODEL IN CRISIS

被引:0
|
作者
Mrcela, Tomislav [1 ]
Bocka, Jelena Dujmovic [2 ]
Zadravec, Tamara [3 ]
机构
[1] Josip Juraj Strossmayer Univ Osijek, Fac Elect Engn, Osijek, Croatia
[2] Josip Juraj Strossmayer Univ Osijek, Fac Law Osijek, Osijek, Croatia
[3] Josip Juraj Strossmayer Univ Osijek, Fac Humanities & Social Sci, Osijek, Croatia
关键词
model; public administration; information; crisis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Suppose we start from the premise that a system process is a unit determined by and connected with the quality of relations between certain elements. In that case, we can select and study a specific subsystem as a partial structure of social activity, with the subsystem having all attributes of a structural unity in crisis. If these requirements are met, a general social system model to be implemented in studied subsystems' crisis management situations can be designed. The paper defines a decision-making model and its response to perturbation, which causes a crisis in two components of social activity. One component is public administration, which is defined by its activities, especially during a crisis. To ensure a social activity's primary function's unique functioning, public administration is a highly complex system whose main issue is its internal structure or hierarchy. Described complexity can be a function of horizontal complexity, with a hierarchical component frequently being lost. On the other hand, it can be a result of a vertical component during crisis management. Another social activity domain is information as a particular segment that is important for society's response during a crisis. As an internal social structure, information seam stable, i.e., its primary function is not disrupted during crisis management; however, internal information structure is profoundly disrupted due to delays. Some aspects of information connections, especially internal connections, are disrupted due to the lack of solid and fast enough responses to a crisis. In crisis changes, prompt responses adjusted to new social situations are of the utmost importance. This paper's designed model demonstrates the implementation of disruptions, which are consequences of fast adjustments to contemporary social events.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 239
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The neurobiology of social decision-making
    Rilling, James K.
    King-Casas, Brooks
    Sanfey, Alan G.
    CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (02) : 159 - 165
  • [42] TEACHING SOCIAL DECISION-MAKING
    ELIAS, MJ
    CLABBY, JF
    EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP, 1988, 45 (06) : 52 - 55
  • [43] DECISION-MAKING AND THE SOCIAL FABRIC
    GOSLIN, DA
    SOCIETY, 1985, 22 (02) : 7 - 11
  • [44] The Neuroscience of Social Decision-Making
    Rilling, James K.
    Sanfey, Alan G.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 62, 2011, 62 : 23 - 48
  • [45] Institutionalization and decision-making autonomy: interest of the concept of crisis and the systemic model
    Zawadzki, L.
    Peru, N.
    Desmidt, T.
    Hommet, C.
    Camus, V.
    CAHIERS DE L ANNEE GERONTOLOGIQUE, 2011, 3 : S94 - S96
  • [46] Opportunities and Presidential Uses of Force A Selection Model of Crisis Decision-Making
    Brule, David J.
    Marshall, Bryan W.
    Prins, Brandon C.
    CONFLICT MANAGEMENT AND PEACE SCIENCE, 2010, 27 (05) : 486 - 510
  • [47] Fuzzy decision-making model to determine the parameters for intelligent design of power system protection
    Liu, LF
    Gao, ZD
    Yang, QX
    Liu, BZ
    IEE PROCEEDINGS-GENERATION TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION, 1998, 145 (02) : 169 - 173
  • [48] A mapping of design decision-making
    Hansen, CT
    Andreasen, MM
    DESIGN 2004: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL DESIGN CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-3, 2004, : 1409 - 1418
  • [49] DECISION-MAKING IN CINECAMERA DESIGN
    LEE, RWS
    JOURNAL OF THE SMPTE-SOCIETY OF MOTION PICTURE AND TELEVISION ENGINEERS, 1973, 82 (04): : 273 - 278
  • [50] Research of model of information management decision-making system
    Zhang Ju-jian
    Proceedings of the 2007 Chinese Control and Decision Conference, 2007, : 923 - 926