Question Mark Sign and Transvaginal Ultrasound Uterine Tenderness for the Diagnosis of Adenomyosis A Prospective Validation

被引:28
作者
Zannoni, Letizia [1 ]
Ambrosio, Marco [1 ]
Raimondo, Diego [1 ]
Arena, Alessandro [1 ]
Del Forno, Simona [1 ]
Borghese, Giulia [1 ]
Paradisi, Roberto [1 ]
Seracchioli, Renato [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Gynecol & Human Reprod Pathophysiol, St Orsola Hosp, Massarenti 13, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
关键词
accuracy; adenomyosis; pelvic pain; question mark sign; transvaginal ultrasound; ultrasound; ELUSIVE ADENOMYOSIS; CONSENSUS OPINION; RISK-FACTORS; PREVALENCE; UTERUS; WOMEN; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; DEFINITIONS; SONOGRAPHY; TERMS;
D O I
10.1002/jum.15237
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the classic ultrasound (US) signs of adenomyosis, the question mark sign and transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) uterine tenderness, in the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Methods This was a prospective study including 78 patients waiting for hysterectomy for uterine benign diseases and undergoing preoperative US examinations to evaluate all criteria for US diagnosis of adenomyosis as reported by the consensus statement of the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment group. A US diagnosis of adenomyosis was made in the presence of 2 or more Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment features. Moreover, the question mark sign and TVUS uterine tenderness were evaluated. Ultrasound features were compared with the histologic examination, which was considered the reference standard for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. The Cohen kappa coefficient was used to measure the accordance between US and histologic results. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of each US feature were calculated. Results The prevalence of adenomyosis in the sample was 33.3%. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of TVUS in the diagnosis of adenomyosis were 77%, 96%, 91%, 89%, and 90%, respectively. Myometrial heterogeneity was the most frequently encountered feature (100%) but showed low specificity (7%). The question mark sign and TVUS uterine tenderness showed sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 41%, 96%, 83%, 77%, and 69% and 69%, 65%, 66%, 81%, and 67%. Conclusions The question mark sign and TVUS uterine tenderness are useful tools for the diagnosis of adenomyosis.
引用
收藏
页码:1405 / 1412
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Adenomyosis and Abnormal Uterine Bleeding (AUB-A)-Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management [J].
Abbott, Jason A. .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 40 :68-81
[2]   Adenomyosis: What the Patient Needs [J].
Alabiso, Giulia ;
Alio, Luigi ;
Arena, Saverio ;
di Prun, Allegra Barbasetti ;
Bergamini, Valentino ;
Berlanda, Nicola ;
Busacca, Mauro ;
Candiani, Massimo ;
Centini, Gabriele ;
Di Cello, Annalisa ;
Exacoustos, Caterina ;
Fedele, Luigi ;
Fuggetta, Eliana ;
Gabbi, Laura ;
Geraci, Elisa ;
Imperiale, Ludovica ;
Lavarini, Elena ;
Incandela, Domenico ;
Lazzeri, Lucia ;
Luisi, Stefano ;
Maiorana, Antonio ;
Maneschi, Francesco ;
Mannini, Luca ;
Mattei, Alberto ;
Muzii, Ludovico ;
Pagliardini, Luca ;
Perandini, Alessio ;
Perelli, Federica ;
Pinzauti, Serena ;
Porpora, Maria Grazia ;
Remorgida, Valentino ;
Maggiore, Umberto Leone Roberti ;
Seracchioli, Renato ;
Solima, Eugenio ;
Somigliana, Edgardo ;
Tosti, Claudia ;
Venturella, Roberta ;
Vercellini, Paolo ;
Vigano, Paola ;
Vignali, Michele ;
Zannoni, Letizia ;
Zullo, Fulvio ;
Zupi, Errico .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 23 (04) :476-488
[3]   Transvaginal Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Adenomyosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Andres, Marina Paula ;
Borrelli, Giuliano Moyses ;
Ribeiro, Juliana ;
Baracat, Edmund Chada ;
Abrao, Mauricio Simoes ;
Kho, Rosanne M. .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 25 (02) :257-264
[4]   Transvaginal ultrasound in the diagnosis of diffuse adenomyosis [J].
Atzori, E ;
Tronci, C ;
Sionis, L .
GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 1996, 42 (01) :39-41
[5]  
AZZIZ R, 1989, OBSTET GYN CLIN N AM, V16, P221
[6]   Limitations of transvaginal sonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis, with histopathological correlation [J].
Bazot, M ;
Daraï, E ;
Rouger, J ;
Detchev, R ;
Cortez, A ;
Uzan, S .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 20 (06) :605-611
[7]   Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology [J].
Bazot, M ;
Cortez, A ;
Darai, E ;
Rouger, J ;
Chopier, J ;
Antoine, JM ;
Uzan, S .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 (11) :2427-2433
[8]   ADENOMYOSIS - A REAPPRAISAL OF SYMPTOMATOLOGY [J].
BENSON, RC ;
SNEEDEN, VD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1958, 76 (05) :1044-1061
[9]   Pathology and physiopathology of adenomyosis [J].
Bergeron, Christine ;
Amant, Frederic ;
Ferenczy, Alex .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2006, 20 (04) :511-521
[10]   Prevalence and risk factors of adenomyosis at hysterectomy [J].
Bergholt, T ;
Eriksen, L ;
Berendt, N ;
Jacobsen, M ;
Hertz, JB .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 (11) :2418-2421