Important Facts and Observations about Pairwise Comparisons (the special issue edition)

被引:33
作者
Koczkodaj, Waldemar W. [1 ]
Mikhailov, Ludmil [2 ]
Redlarski, Grzegorz [3 ]
Soltys, Michael [4 ]
Szybowski, Jacek [5 ]
Tamazian, Gaik [6 ]
Wajch, Eliza [7 ]
Yuen, Kevin Kam Fung [8 ]
机构
[1] Laurentian Univ, Sudbury, ON P3E 2C6, Canada
[2] Univ Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[3] Gdansk Univ Technol, PL-80297 Gdansk, Poland
[4] California State Univ Channel Isl, Camarillo, CA 93012 USA
[5] AGH Univ Sci & Technol, PL-30059 Krakow, Poland
[6] St Petersburg State Univ, St Petersburg 198207, Russia
[7] Siedlce Univ Nat Sci & Humanities, PL-08110 Siedlce, Poland
[8] Xian Jiaotong Liverpool Univ, Suzhou 215123, Peoples R China
关键词
pairwise comparisons; inconsistency analysis; ratio scale; approximation; DISTANCE-BASED INCONSISTENCY; COMPARISON MATRICES; NUMERICAL SCALES; SCALING METHOD; PRIORITIES; CONSISTENCY; EIGENVALUE;
D O I
10.3233/FI-2016-1336
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This study has been inspired by numerous requests for clarification from researchers who often confuse Saaty's Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with the pairwise comparisons (PC) method, taking AHP as the only representation of PC. This study should be regarded as an interpretation and clarification of past investigations of PC. In addition, this article is a reflection on general PC research at a higher level of abstraction: the philosophy of science. It delves into the foundations and implications of pairwise comparisons. Some results of this study are based on a recently published work by Koczkodaj and Szwarc. Finally, open problems have also been reported for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 307
页数:17
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J ROY STAT SOC D STA
[2]  
[Anonymous], ARROW LECT SERIES
[3]  
[Anonymous], BIOMETRIKA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199711)6:6<309::AID-MCDA163>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-2, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199711)6:6<309::AID-MCDA163>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-2, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199711)6:63.0.CO
[7]  
2-2]
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1974, DES AID DOC TECHN
[9]   A critical analysis of the eigenvalue method used to derive priorities in AHP [J].
Bana E Costa, Carlos A. ;
Vansnick, Jean-Claude .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2008, 187 (03) :1422-1428
[10]  
Barbara S, 2015, FUNDAMENTA INFORM SP