Impact of Aortic Insufficiency on Ascending Aortic Dilatation and Adverse Aortic Events After Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With a Bicuspid Aortic Valve

被引:51
作者
Wang, Yongshi
Wu, Boting
Li, Jun
Dong, Lili
Wang, Chunsheng
Shu, Xianhong
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Shanghai Inst Med Imaging, Shanghai Inst Cardiovasc Dis, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Transfus, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
STENOSIS; FLOW; CONTRIBUTOR; DISSECTION; MUTATIONS; DILATION; DISEASE; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.10.047
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Aberrant flow pattern and congenital fragility bestows bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) with a propensity toward ascending aorta dilatation, aneurysm, and dissection. Whether isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) can prevent further dilatation in BAV ascending aorta and what indicates concurrent aortic intervention in the case of valve operation remain controversial. Methods. From June 2006 to January 2009, patients with a BAV who underwent isolated AVR were consecutively included and categorized into aortic insufficiency (BAV-AI, n = 84) and aortic stenosis (n = 112) groups, and another population of patients with a tricuspid aortic valve with aortic insufficiency (n = 149) was also recruited during the same period for comparison of annual aortic dilatation rate and adverse aortic events after isolated AVR. Results. With a median follow-up period of 72 months (interquartile range, 66 to 78 months), ascending aorta dilatation rates were faster in the BAV-AI group than the BAV plus aortic stenosis and tricuspid aortic valve with aortic insufficiency groups (both p < 0.001). The BAV-AI group showed a higher risk for adverse aortic events compared with both the BAV plus aortic stenosis (15.5% versus 4.5%; p = 0.008) and tricuspid aortic valve with aortic insufficiency (15.5% versus 6.0%; p = 0.018) groups. Cox regression analysis identified aortic insufficiency (hazard ratio, 3.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 11.1; p = 0.019) as an independent risk factor for adverse aortic events among patients with BAV in general, whereas preoperative ascending aortic diameter larger than 45 mm (hazard ratio, 13.8; 95% confidence interval, 3.0 to 63.3; p = 0.001) served as a prognostic indicator in the BAV-AI group. Conclusions. An aggressive policy of preventive aortic interventions seemed appropriate in patients with BAV-AI during AVR, and BAV phenotype presenting as either insufficiency or stenosis should be taken into consideration when contemplating optimal surgical strategies for BAV aortopathy. (C) 2016 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:1707 / 1715
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
American College of Cardiology, 2006, J Am Coll Cardiol, V48, pe1, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.05.021
[2]   Comparison of ascending aortic cohesion between patients with bicuspid aortic valve stenosis and regurgitation [J].
Benedik, Jaroslav ;
Dohle, Daniel S. ;
Wendt, Daniel ;
Pilarczyk, Kevin ;
Price, Vivien ;
Mourad, Fanar ;
Zykina, Elizaveta ;
Stebner, Ferdinand ;
Tsagakis, Konstantinos ;
Jakob, Heinz .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2014, 46 (06) :E89-E93
[3]   Aortic Dilation in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease Flow Pattern Is a Major Contributor and Differs With Valve Fusion Type [J].
Bissell, Malenka M. ;
Hess, Aaron T. ;
Biasiolli, Luca ;
Glaze, Steffan J. ;
Loudon, Margaret ;
Pitcher, Alex ;
Davis, Anne ;
Prendergast, Bernard ;
Markl, Michael ;
Barker, Alex J. ;
Neubauer, Stefan ;
Myerson, Saul G. .
CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2013, 6 (04) :499-507
[4]   Canadian Cardiovascular Society Position Statement on the Management of Thoracic Aortic Disease [J].
Boodhwani, Munir ;
Andelfinger, Gregor ;
Leipsic, Jonathon ;
Lindsay, Thomas ;
McMurtry, M. Sean ;
Therrien, Judith ;
Siu, Samuel C. .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 30 (06) :577-589
[5]   Should the ascending aorta be replaced more frequently in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease? [J].
Borger, MA ;
Preston, M ;
Ivanov, J ;
Fedak, FWM ;
Davierwala, P ;
Armstrong, S ;
David, TE .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2004, 128 (05) :677-683
[6]  
CZER LSC, 1990, J THORAC CARDIOV SUR, V100, P44
[7]   Risk of subsequent aortic dilatation is low in patients with bicuspid aortic valve and normal aortic root diameter at the time of aortic valve replacement [J].
Dayan, Victor ;
Cura, Leandro ;
Munoz, Leon ;
Areco, Daniel ;
Ferreiro, Alejandro ;
Pizzano, Nelson .
INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2010, 10 (04) :535-538
[8]   2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases [J].
Erbel, Raimund ;
Aboyans, Victor ;
Boileau, Catherine ;
Bossone, Eduardo ;
Di Bartolomeo, Roberto ;
Eggebrecht, Holger ;
Evangelista, Arturo ;
Falk, Volkmar ;
Frank, Herbert ;
Gaemperli, Oliver ;
Grabenwoeger, Martin ;
Haverich, Axel ;
Iung, Bernard ;
Manolis, Athanasios John ;
Meijboom, Folkert ;
Nienaber, Christoph A. ;
Roffi, Marco ;
Rousseau, Herve ;
Sechtem, Udo ;
Sirnes, Per Anton ;
von Allmen, Regula S. ;
Vrints, Christiaan J. M. .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 35 (41) :2873-U93
[9]   Clinical and pathophysiological implications of a bicuspid aortic valve [J].
Fedak, PWM ;
Verma, S ;
David, TE ;
Leask, RL ;
Weisel, RD ;
Butany, J .
CIRCULATION, 2002, 106 (08) :900-904
[10]   Mutations in NOTCH1 cause aortic valve disease [J].
Garg, V ;
Muth, AN ;
Ransom, JF ;
Schluterman, MK ;
Barnes, R ;
King, IN ;
Grossfeld, PD ;
Srivastava, D .
NATURE, 2005, 437 (7056) :270-274