Performance metrics analysis of dynamic multi-objective optimization for energy consumption and productivity improvement in batch electrodialysis

被引:4
作者
Rohman, Fakhrony Sholahudin [1 ]
Aziz, Norashid [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sains Malaysia, Sch Chem Engn, Engn Campus, Seri Ampangan, Penang, Malaysia
关键词
Electrodialysis; Energy consumption; Dynamic multi-objective optimization; Optimal control trajectory; WASTE-WATER; SEPARATION; ACID; PARAMETERS; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1080/00986445.2019.1674817
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Empty fruit bunch (EFB) can be utilized to produce sugar via hydrochloric acid (HCl) hydrolysis where the HCl must be concentrated to retain the pure sugar. Electrodialysis (ED) is an effective method for acid-sugar separation and has to be optimized to ensure that the most economical operation can be achieved. However, ED batch optimization consists of conflicting multiple objectives that are required to be solved as a dynamic multi-objective optimization (MOO) problem. In the past, the dynamic optimization of acid-sugar ED separation was carried out by solving a single objective optimization problem in sequence but this approach could not be accomplished with different objective functions simultaneously. In this work, the results of the MOO which consist of a number of optimal solutions are configured as a Pareto Front (PF). The weighted sum, the ?-constraint, and the elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm or NSGA-II approaches are applied to solve the conflicting objectives functions i.e. minimization of energy consumption and maximization of acid concentration These result in a set of several Pareto optimal solutions with two objectives: maximizing concentrated acid ranging from 1.89?M to 2.1?M is accompanied by minimizing energy consumption ranging from 630?Wh to 848?Wh. Each point of the Pareto solutions contains a different combination of optimal current density and flowrate trajectories which promotes a different amount of energy consumption and acid concentration. This set of solutions provides choices in assessing the tradeoffs and determining the most appropriate operating policy.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 529
页数:13
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
ANDERSSON J, 2000, TECHNICAL REPORT
[2]   AMIGO2, a toolbox for dynamic modeling, optimization and control in systems biology [J].
Balsa-Canto, Eva ;
Henriques, David ;
Gabor, Attila ;
Banga, Julio R. .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2016, 32 (21) :3357-3359
[3]  
Bandyopadhyay S., 2013, Unsupervised Classification: Similarity Measures, Classical and Metaheuristic Approaches, and Applications, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-32451-2
[4]  
Basiron Y., 2002, Oil Palm Industry Economic Journal, V2, P1
[6]   A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II [J].
Deb, K ;
Pratap, A ;
Agarwal, S ;
Meyarivan, T .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2002, 6 (02) :182-197
[7]   Multiobjective optimization and experimental validation for batch cooling crystallization of citric acid anhydrate [J].
Hemalatha, K. ;
Nagveni, P. ;
Kumar, P. Naveen ;
Rani, K. Yamuna .
COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 112 :292-303
[8]   Application and comparison of NSGA-II and MOPSO in multi-objective optimization of water resources systems [J].
Hojjati, Ali ;
Monadi, Mohsen ;
Faridhosseini, Alireza ;
Mohammadi, Mirali .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY AND HYDROMECHANICS, 2018, 66 (03) :323-329
[9]  
Ibrahim A., 2017, THESIS
[10]  
IDERIS A, 2005, THESIS