ENDOTOXIN REMOVAL IN SEPTIC SHOCK WITH THE ALTECO LPS ADSORBER WAS SAFE BUT SHOWED NO BENEFIT COMPARED TO PLACEBO IN THE DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL-THE ASSET STUDY

被引:11
|
作者
Lipcsey, Miklos [1 ]
Tenhunen, Jyrki [2 ]
Pischke, Soeren E. [3 ,4 ]
Kuitunen, Anne [5 ,6 ]
Flaatten, Hans [7 ]
De Geer, Lina [8 ,9 ]
Sjolin, Jan [10 ]
Frithiof, Robert [2 ]
Chew, Michelle S. [8 ,9 ]
Bendel, Stepani [11 ]
Kawati, Rafael [2 ]
Larsson, Anders [12 ]
Mollnes, Tom Eirik [4 ,13 ,14 ,15 ]
Tonnessen, Tor Inge [3 ,16 ]
Rubertsson, Sten [2 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Surg Sci Anaesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Hedenstierna Lab, Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Uppsala Univ, Dept Surg Sci Anaesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Oslo Univ Hosp, Div Emergencies & Crit Care, Oslo, Norway
[4] Univ Oslo, Dept Immunol, Oslo, Norway
[5] Univ Tampere, Dept Intens Care, Tampere, Finland
[6] Tampere Univ Hosp, Tampere, Finland
[7] UiB Bergen, Dept Clin Med, Haukeland Univ Hosp, Bergen, Norway
[8] Linkoping Univ, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care, Linkoping, Sweden
[9] Linkoping Univ, Dept Med & Hlth Sci, Linkoping, Sweden
[10] Uppsala Univ, Dept Med Sci, Sect Infect Dis, Uppsala, Sweden
[11] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Intens Care, Kuopio, Finland
[12] Uppsala Univ, Dept Med Sci, Sect Clin Chem, Uppsala, Sweden
[13] Nordland Hosp, Res Lab, Bodo, Norway
[14] Univ Tromso, KG Jebsen TREC, Tromso, Norway
[15] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Ctr Mol Inflammat Res, Trondheim, Norway
[16] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
来源
SHOCK | 2020年 / 54卷 / 02期
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Endotoxins; gram-negative bacteria; hemoperfusion; septic shock; POLYMYXIN-B HEMOPERFUSION; ORGAN FAILURE; SEPSIS; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1097/SHK.0000000000001503
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Purpose: Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) are presumed to contribute to the inflammatory response in sepsis. We investigated if extracorporeal Alteco LPS Adsorber for LPS removal in early gram-negative septic shock was feasible and safe. Also, effects on endotoxin level, inflammatory response, and organ function were assessed. Methods: A pilot, double-blinded, randomized, Phase IIa, feasibility clinical investigation was undertaken in six Scandinavian intensive care units aiming to allocate 32 septic shock patients with abdominal or urogenital focus on LPS Adsorber therapy or a Sham Adsorber, therapy without active LPS binding. The study treatment was initiated within 12 h of inclusion and given for 6 h daily on first 2 days. LPS was measured in all patients. Results: The investigation was terminated after 527 days with eight patients included in the LPS Adsorber group and seven in the Sham group. Twenty-one adverse effects, judged not to be related to the device, were reported in three patients in the LPS Adsorber group and two in the Sham group. Two patients in the Sham group and no patients in the LPS Adsorber group died within 28 days. Plasma LPS levels were low without groups differences during or after adsorber therapy. The changes in inflammatory markers and organ function were similar in the groups. Conclusions: In a small cohort of patients with presumed gram-negative septic shock, levels of circulating endotoxin were low and no adverse effects within 28 days after LPS adsorber-treatment were observed. No benefit compared with a sham device was seen when using a LPS adsorber in addition to standard care.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / 231
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Efficacy and safety of the Qiguiyin formula in severe pneumonia: study protocol for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial
    Huang Po
    Guo Yuhong
    Zhao Jingxia
    Li Bo
    Wu Yanqing
    Liu Qingquan
    JOURNAL OF TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE, 2020, 40 (02) : 317 - 323
  • [32] Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial on levothyroxine and liothyronine combination therapy in totally thyroidectomized subjects: the LEVOLIO study
    Brigante, Giulia
    Santi, Daniele
    Boselli, Gisella
    Margiotta, Gianluca
    Corleto, Rossella
    Monzani, Maria Laura
    Craparo, Andrea
    Locaso, Michela
    Sperduti, Samantha
    Roy, Neena
    Casarini, Livio
    Trenti, Tommaso
    Tagliavini, Simonetta
    De Santis, Maria Cristina
    Roli, Laura
    Rochira, Vincenzo
    Simoni, Manuela
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2024, 190 (01) : 12 - 22
  • [33] Effects of high doses of selenium, as sodium selenite, in septic shock patients a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, multi-center phase II study - Selenium and sepsis
    Forceville, Xavier
    JOURNAL OF TRACE ELEMENTS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2007, 21 : 62 - 65
  • [34] Multiple-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor 546C88:: Effect on survival in patients with septic shock
    López, A
    Lorente, JA
    Steingrub, J
    Bakker, J
    McLuckie, A
    Willatts, S
    Brockway, M
    Anzueto, A
    Holzapfel, L
    Breen, D
    Silverman, MS
    Takala, J
    Donaldson, J
    Arneson, C
    Grove, G
    Grossman, S
    Grover, R
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2004, 32 (01) : 21 - 30
  • [35] Scopolaminebutyl given prophylactically for death rattle: study protocol of a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial in a frail patient population (the SILENCE study)
    van Esch, Harriette J.
    van Zuylen, Lia
    Oomen-de Hoop, Esther
    van der Heide, Agnes
    van der Rijt, Carin C. D.
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2018, 17
  • [36] Diminishing accelerated long-term forgetting in mild cognitive impairment: Study protocol for a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized controlled trial
    Adcock, Katherine S.
    Lawlor, Brian
    Robertson, Ian H.
    Vanneste, Sven
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 30
  • [37] Effect of a probiotic preparation (VSL#3) in critically ill patients: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (Pilot Study)
    Ebrahimi-Mameghani, Mehrangiz
    Sanaie, Sarvin
    Mahmoodpoor, Ata
    Hamishehkar, Hadi
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 29 (02) : 490 - 494
  • [38] Efficacy and safety of early target-controlled plasma volume replacement with a balanced gelatine solution versus a balanced electrolyte solution in patients with severe sepsis/septic shock: study protocol, design, and rationale of a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, multicentric, international clinical trial: GENIUS-Gelatine use in ICU and sepsis
    Marx, Gernot
    Zacharowski, Kai
    Ichai, Carole
    Asehnoune, Karim
    Cerny, Vladimir
    Dembinski, Rolf
    Ferrer Roca, Ricard
    Fries, Dietmar
    Molnar, Zsolt
    Rosenberger, Peter
    Sanchez-Sanchez, Manuel
    Schuerholz, Tobias
    Dehnhardt, Tamara
    Schmier, Sonja
    von Kleist, Elke
    Brauer, Ute
    Simon, Tim-Philipp
    TRIALS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [39] SUPPLEMENTAL IMMUNOGLOBULIN THERAPY IN SEPSIS AND SEPTIC SHOCK - COMPARISON OF MORTALITY UNDER TREATMENT WITH POLYVALENT IV IMMUNOGLOBULIN VERSUS PLACEBO - PROTOCOL OF A MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED, PROSPECTIVE, DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL
    PILZ, G
    FATEHMOGHADAM, S
    VIELL, B
    BUJDOSO, O
    DORING, G
    MARGET, W
    NEUMANN, R
    WERDAN, K
    THEORETICAL SURGERY, 1993, 8 (02): : 61 - 83
  • [40] Clinical trial: the efficacy of alverine citrate/simeticone combination on abdominal pain/discomfort in irritable bowel syndrome - a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
    Wittmann, T.
    Paradowski, L.
    Ducrotte, P.
    Bueno, L.
    Delestrain, M. -C. Andro
    ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2010, 31 (06) : 615 - 624