ENDOTOXIN REMOVAL IN SEPTIC SHOCK WITH THE ALTECO LPS ADSORBER WAS SAFE BUT SHOWED NO BENEFIT COMPARED TO PLACEBO IN THE DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL-THE ASSET STUDY

被引:11
|
作者
Lipcsey, Miklos [1 ]
Tenhunen, Jyrki [2 ]
Pischke, Soeren E. [3 ,4 ]
Kuitunen, Anne [5 ,6 ]
Flaatten, Hans [7 ]
De Geer, Lina [8 ,9 ]
Sjolin, Jan [10 ]
Frithiof, Robert [2 ]
Chew, Michelle S. [8 ,9 ]
Bendel, Stepani [11 ]
Kawati, Rafael [2 ]
Larsson, Anders [12 ]
Mollnes, Tom Eirik [4 ,13 ,14 ,15 ]
Tonnessen, Tor Inge [3 ,16 ]
Rubertsson, Sten [2 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Surg Sci Anaesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Hedenstierna Lab, Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Uppsala Univ, Dept Surg Sci Anaesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Oslo Univ Hosp, Div Emergencies & Crit Care, Oslo, Norway
[4] Univ Oslo, Dept Immunol, Oslo, Norway
[5] Univ Tampere, Dept Intens Care, Tampere, Finland
[6] Tampere Univ Hosp, Tampere, Finland
[7] UiB Bergen, Dept Clin Med, Haukeland Univ Hosp, Bergen, Norway
[8] Linkoping Univ, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care, Linkoping, Sweden
[9] Linkoping Univ, Dept Med & Hlth Sci, Linkoping, Sweden
[10] Uppsala Univ, Dept Med Sci, Sect Infect Dis, Uppsala, Sweden
[11] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Intens Care, Kuopio, Finland
[12] Uppsala Univ, Dept Med Sci, Sect Clin Chem, Uppsala, Sweden
[13] Nordland Hosp, Res Lab, Bodo, Norway
[14] Univ Tromso, KG Jebsen TREC, Tromso, Norway
[15] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Ctr Mol Inflammat Res, Trondheim, Norway
[16] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
来源
SHOCK | 2020年 / 54卷 / 02期
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Endotoxins; gram-negative bacteria; hemoperfusion; septic shock; POLYMYXIN-B HEMOPERFUSION; ORGAN FAILURE; SEPSIS; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1097/SHK.0000000000001503
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Purpose: Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) are presumed to contribute to the inflammatory response in sepsis. We investigated if extracorporeal Alteco LPS Adsorber for LPS removal in early gram-negative septic shock was feasible and safe. Also, effects on endotoxin level, inflammatory response, and organ function were assessed. Methods: A pilot, double-blinded, randomized, Phase IIa, feasibility clinical investigation was undertaken in six Scandinavian intensive care units aiming to allocate 32 septic shock patients with abdominal or urogenital focus on LPS Adsorber therapy or a Sham Adsorber, therapy without active LPS binding. The study treatment was initiated within 12 h of inclusion and given for 6 h daily on first 2 days. LPS was measured in all patients. Results: The investigation was terminated after 527 days with eight patients included in the LPS Adsorber group and seven in the Sham group. Twenty-one adverse effects, judged not to be related to the device, were reported in three patients in the LPS Adsorber group and two in the Sham group. Two patients in the Sham group and no patients in the LPS Adsorber group died within 28 days. Plasma LPS levels were low without groups differences during or after adsorber therapy. The changes in inflammatory markers and organ function were similar in the groups. Conclusions: In a small cohort of patients with presumed gram-negative septic shock, levels of circulating endotoxin were low and no adverse effects within 28 days after LPS adsorber-treatment were observed. No benefit compared with a sham device was seen when using a LPS adsorber in addition to standard care.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / 231
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Immunologic and hemodynamic effects of "low-dose" hydrocortisone in septic shock - A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study
    Keh, D
    Boehnke, T
    Weber-Cartens, S
    Schulz, C
    Ahlers, O
    Bercker, S
    Volk, HD
    Doecke, WD
    Falke, KJ
    Gerlach, H
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2003, 167 (04) : 512 - 520
  • [22] Effects of high doses of selenium, as sodium selenite, in septic shock: a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, phase II study
    Xavier Forceville
    Bruno Laviolle
    Djillali Annane
    Dominique Vitoux
    Gérard Bleichner
    Jean-Michel Korach
    Emmanuel Cantais
    Hugues Georges
    Jean-Louis Soubirou
    Alain Combes
    Eric Bellissant
    Critical Care, 11
  • [23] Effects of dobutamine on systemic, regional and microcirculatory perfusion parameters in septic shock: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study
    Glenn Hernandez
    Alejandro Bruhn
    Cecilia Luengo
    Tomas Regueira
    Eduardo Kattan
    Andrea Fuentealba
    Jorge Florez
    Ricardo Castro
    Andres Aquevedo
    Ronald Pairumani
    Paul McNab
    Can Ince
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2013, 39 : 1435 - 1443
  • [24] Effects of nitroglycerin on sublingual microcirculatory blood flow in patients with severe sepsis/septic shock after a strict resuscitation protocol: A double-blind randomized placebo controlled trial
    Boerma, E. Christiaan
    Koopmans, Matty
    Konijn, Arjan
    Kaiferova, Katerina
    Bakker, Andries J.
    van Roon, Eric N.
    Buter, Hanneke
    Bruins, Nienke
    Egbers, Peter H.
    Gerritsen, Rik T.
    Koetsier, Peter M.
    Kingma, W. Peter
    Kuiper, Michael A.
    Ince, Can
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (01) : 93 - 100
  • [25] Ubiquinol (reduced Coenzyme Q10) in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, pilot trial
    Michael W. Donnino
    Sharri J. Mortensen
    Lars W. Andersen
    Maureen Chase
    Katherine M. Berg
    Julia Balkema
    Jeejabai Radhakrishnan
    Raúl J. Gazmuri
    Xiaowen Liu
    Michael N. Cocchi
    Critical Care, 19
  • [26] Dexmedetomidine to reduce vasopressor resistance in refractory septic shock: Protocol for a double-blind randomized controlled pilot trial (ADRESS Pilot study)
    Dargent, Auguste
    Bourredjem, Abderrahmane
    Argaud, Laurent
    Levy, Bruno
    Fournel, Isabelle
    Cransac, Amelie
    Badie, Julio
    Quintin, Luc
    Quenot, Jean-Pierre
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [27] Early administration of vitamin C in patients with sepsis or septic shock in emergency departments: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial: the C-EASIE trial
    Stefanie Vandervelden
    Bente Cortens
    Steffen Fieuws
    Wilma Eegdeman
    Stefano Malinverni
    Philippe Vanhove
    Koen Monsieurs
    Jan Breuls
    Ives Hubloue
    François Stifkens
    Jacques Creteur
    Lina Wauters
    Didier Desruelles
    Critical Care, 29 (1):
  • [28] Double-Blind Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Dopamine Versus Epinephrine as First-Line Vasoactive Drugs in Pediatric Septic Shock
    Ventura, Andrea M. C.
    Shieh, Huei Hsin
    Bousso, Albert
    Goes, Patricia F.
    Fernandes, Iracema de Cassia F. O.
    de Souza, Daniela C.
    Pedro Paulo, Rodrigo Locatelli
    Chagas, Fabiana
    Gilio, Alfredo E.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 43 (11) : 2292 - 2302
  • [29] MARVEL: A Randomized Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Therapy: Study Rationale and Design
    Yang, Qingwu
    Guo, Changwei
    Yue, Chengsong
    Yang, Jie
    Li, Linyu
    Peng, Zhouzhou
    Hu, Jinrong
    Huang, Jiandi
    Song, Jiaxing
    Huang, Jiacheng
    Kong, Weilin
    Yu, Nizhen
    Yang, Dahong
    Liu, Xiang
    Wang, Duolao
    Nogueira, Raul G.
    Li, Fengli
    Nguyen, Thanh N.
    Zi, Wenjie
    STROKE-VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL NEUROLOGY, 2024, 4 (02):
  • [30] Effect of high-dose intravenous ascorbic acid on microcirculation and endothelial glycocalyx during sepsis and septic shock: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study
    Belousoviene, Egle
    Pranskuniene, Zivile
    Vaitkaitiene, Egle
    Pilvinis, Vidas
    Pranskunas, Andrius
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2023, 23 (01)