What do we do when we analyse the temporal aspects of computer-supported collaborative learning? A systematic literature review

被引:42
|
作者
Lamsa, Joni [1 ]
Hamalainen, Raija [1 ]
Koskinen, Pekka [2 ]
Viiri, Jouni [3 ]
Lampi, Emilia [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jyvaskyla, Dept Educ, POB 35, FI-40014 Jyvaskyla, Yliopisto, Finland
[2] Univ Jyvaskyla, Dept Phys, POB 35, FI-40014 Jyvaskyla, Yliopisto, Finland
[3] Univ Jyvaskyla, Dept Teacher Educ, POB 35, FI-40014 Jyvaskyla, Yliopisto, Finland
[4] Univ Jyvaskyla, Finnish Inst Educ Res, POB 35, FI-40014 Jyvaskyla, Yliopisto, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Collaborative technology; Methodology; Systematic review; Temporal analysis; Computer-supported collaborative learning  (CSCL); SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS; KNOWLEDGE CONSTRUCTION; ONLINE; PATTERNS; CSCL; STRATEGIES; SEQUENCES; LEARNERS; BEHAVIOR; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100387
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
To better understand the premises for successful computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL), several studies over the last 10 years have analysed the temporal aspects of CSCL. We broadly define the temporal aspects of CSCL as focusing on the characteristics of or interrelations between events over time. The analysis of these aspects, however, has been loosely defined, creating challenges regarding the comparability and commensurability of studies. To address these challenges, we conducted a systematic literature review to define the temporal analysis procedure for CSCL using 78 journal papers published from 2003 to 2019. After identifying the key operations to be included in the procedure, we studied how the studies implemented these operations. When analysing the temporal aspects of CSCL, six key operations were conducted: (a) proposing theoretically framed research questions (mostly descriptive) regarding the temporal aspects of CSCL; (b) setting up the context (mostly online interaction mediated by communication technologies); (c) collecting process data (mostly asynchronous online discussions); (d) conceptualising events from the process data (mostly communication units, such as messages); (e) conducting one or more temporal analysis methods (mostly social network analysis or sequential analysis); and (f) interpreting the outcomes with the temporal analysis and possible data or method triangulation (mostly sequences of two or more events that had to do with learner interaction or thoughts and ideas developed in the interaction). The temporal analysis procedure can help design both theory-driven studies and methodological experiments advancing CSCL research. Overall, our study increases scholarly understanding regarding the temporal aspects of CSCL.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] What do we know about highly effective therapists? A systematic review
    Pereira, Gladis-Lee
    Trujillo-Sanchez, Carolina
    Alonso-Vega, Jesus
    Echevarria-Escalante, Daniel
    Froxan-Parga, Maria-Xesus
    ANALES DE PSICOLOGIA, 2023, 39 (01): : 10 - 19
  • [42] What Do We Know About Behavioral Crises in Dementia? A Systematic Review
    Backhouse, Tamara
    Camino, Julieta
    Mioshi, Eneida
    JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE, 2018, 62 (01) : 99 - 113
  • [43] What do we know about immigrants' travel behaviour? A systematic literature review and proposed conceptual framework
    Delbosc, Alexa
    Shafi, Rahman
    TRANSPORT REVIEWS, 2023, 43 (05) : 914 - 934
  • [44] How Do We Model Learning at Scale? A Systematic Review of Research on MOOCs
    Joksimovic, Srecko
    Poquet, Oleksandra
    Kovanovic, Vitomir
    Dowell, Nia
    Mills, Caitlin
    Gasevic, Dragan
    Dawson, Shane
    Graesser, Arthur C.
    Brooks, Christopher
    REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2018, 88 (01) : 43 - 86
  • [45] What do we know about preventing school violence? A systematic review of systematic reviews
    Lester, Soraya
    Lawrence, Cayleigh
    Ward, Catherine L.
    PSYCHOLOGY HEALTH & MEDICINE, 2017, 22 : 187 - 223
  • [46] Systematic Review: The Learning Curve for Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy-What Do We Know?
    Morozov, Andrey
    Babaevskaya, Diana
    Taratkin, Mark
    Inoyatov, Jasur
    Laukhtina, Ekaterina
    Moschini, Marco
    Singla, Nirmish
    Gomez Rivas, Juan
    Teoh, Jeremy Yuen-Chun
    Glybochko, Petr
    Enikeev, Dmitry
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2022, 36 (06) : 770 - 784
  • [47] What do we really mean when we talk about 'exit'? A critical review of research on entrepreneurial exit
    Wennberg, Karl
    DeTienne, Dawn R.
    INTERNATIONAL SMALL BUSINESS JOURNAL-RESEARCHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP, 2014, 32 (01): : 4 - 16
  • [48] How do we assess vulnerability to climate change in India? A systematic review of literature
    Singh, Chandni
    Deshpande, Tanvi
    Basu, Ritwika
    REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2017, 17 (02) : 527 - 538
  • [49] How do we study resilience? A systematic review
    de Waroux, Yann le Polain
    Carignan, Marie-Claude
    del Giorgio, Olivia
    Diaz, Leandro
    Enrico, Lucas
    Jaureguiberry, Pedro
    Lipoma, Maria Lucrecia
    Mazzini, Flavia
    Diaz, Sandra
    PEOPLE AND NATURE, 2024, 6 (02) : 474 - 489
  • [50] What exactly do we mean by 'recurrent implantation failure'? A systematic review and opinion
    Polanski, Lukasz T.
    Baumgarten, Miriam N.
    Quenby, Siobhan
    Brosens, Jan
    Campbell, Bruce K.
    Raine-Fenning, Nicholas J.
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2014, 28 (04) : 409 - 423