Minimally invasive surgical approach for radicalization of incidental post-cholecystectomy gallbladder carcinoma: safety, feasibility and outcomes

被引:11
作者
Sinagra, Emanuele [1 ,2 ]
Garritano, Stefano [3 ]
Iacopinelli, Salvatore Marco [3 ]
Messina, Marco [4 ]
Raimondo, Dario [1 ]
Rossi, Francesca [1 ]
Spada, Massimiliano
Martorana, Guido [3 ]
Spampinato, Marcello Giuseppe [3 ]
机构
[1] Fdn Ist G Giglio, Gastroenterol & Endoscopy Unit, Cefalu, Italy
[2] Univ Palermo, Euromediterranean Inst Sci & Technol IEMEST, Palermo, Italy
[3] Fdn Ist G Giglio, Surg Unit, Cefalu, Italy
[4] Fdn Ist G Giglio, Oncol Unit, Cefalu, Italy
关键词
Gallbladder; carcinoma; laparoscopic cholecystectomy; robotic surgery; GERMAN REGISTRY; CANCER; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; REOPERATION; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1080/13645706.2017.1410489
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and aims: Gallbladder carcinoma is a rare but aggressive malignant neoplasm. The incidence of intra- or post-operative incidental gallbladder carcinoma diagnosis following laparoscopic cholecystectomy is estimated to be 1-2%. Aggressive re-resection is warranted as the majority of patients have residual disease either in the liver or the lymph nodes. However the use of a minimally invasive surgical approach (MISA) to perform a radicalization in these patients has not been investigated yet. We retrospectively analyzed surgical and oncologic outcome of a small selected cohort of patients with incidental gallbladder carcinoma whom underwent redo radicalization surgery by MISA. Material and methods: From April 2012 to June 2014 at our department six patients (three females and three males) with incidental findings of gallbladder carcinoma pT1b (stage I) following laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and referred to our center from other secondary-level referral hospitals, underwent a redo surgery for radicalization by means of laparoscopic (n. 3) or robotic approach (n. 3). A retrospective analysis of prospective collected data was performed. Results: The redo procedure consisted of a liver resection (segments IVb+V) and lymph nodes clearance of hepatoduodenal hilum and common hepatic artery. Conversion rate was zero. Median operative time was 290 (250-310) min. Estimate blood loss was 175 (100-350) ml. Total hospital stay was 6 (5-10) days. All liver resections were performed without inflow vascular clamping. One patient was re-operated for hemoperitoneum while peri-operative mortality was zero. Oncologically, an R0 resection was always achieved with a mean number of lymph nodes retrieved of 17,5 (14-22). The stage of the neoplasm was confirmed in all cases but one, who was found to have a pN1 status (stage IIIb). At 21 (6-32) months follow-up all patients are alive and no recurrence has been observed. Conclusions: Our data suggest that radicalization of patients with stage I incidental postoperative gallbladder carcinoma can be done by a MISA without compromising the oncologic outcome. Larger studies are needed to validate these results.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 220
页数:4
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] A Retrospective Analysis of Incidental Gallbladder Cancer on Post-cholecystectomy Pathological Review
    Guner, Murat
    Kaya, Tayfun
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (10)
  • [2] Management of Post-Cholecystectomy Double Trouble: Bile Duct Injury with Incidental Gallbladder Cancer
    Gupta, Vishal
    Chandra, Abhijit
    Hatimi, Hunaid
    Kumar, Saket
    Rahul, R.
    Singh, Prabhu
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 81 (02) : 111 - 118
  • [3] Surgical approach does not influence the outcome of incidental gallbladder carcinoma
    Zhang, Wei-Jie
    Xu, Gui-Fang
    Tian, Zhi-Qiang
    Wu, Guog-Zhong
    Wang, Hao
    Guan, Wen-Xian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2015, 8 (01): : 869 - 875
  • [4] Management of Post-Cholecystectomy Double Trouble: Bile Duct Injury with Incidental Gallbladder Cancer
    Vishal Gupta
    Abhijit Chandra
    Hunaid Hatimi
    Saket Kumar
    Rahul R
    Prabhu Singh
    Indian Journal of Surgery, 2019, 81 : 111 - 118
  • [5] Minimally invasive versus the conventional open surgical approach of a radical cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer: a retrospective comparative study
    Agarwal, Anil K.
    Javed, Amit
    Kalayarasan, Raja
    Sakhuja, Puja
    HPB, 2015, 17 (06) : 536 - 541
  • [6] Long-Term Outcomes Following Surgical Repair for Post-cholecystectomy Biliary Strictures
    Sreepathi, Venkkatesh
    Srinivasan, Karthikeyan
    Pillai, Sastha Ahanatha
    Ramasamy, Villalan
    Chowdary, M. B. Krishna Prasad
    Murugesan, Thamarai Kannan
    Subbareddiar, Padmanabhan
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (07)
  • [7] TULC - Total Umbilical Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy An Economic Approach to Minimally Invasive Surgery of the Gallbladder
    Petridis, C.
    Klein, B.
    Parzhuber, A.
    Rau, H. G.
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 2012, 137 (01): : 43 - 47
  • [8] Surgical strategy for suspected early gallbladder carcinoma including incidental gallbladder carcinoma diagnosed during or after cholecystectomy
    Nitta, Toshikatsu
    Kataoka, Jun
    Ohta, Masato
    Fujii, Kensuke
    Takashima, Yuko
    Inoue, Yoshihiro
    Ishibashi, Takashi
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2018, 33 : 56 - 59
  • [9] Robotic Central Hepatectomy for the Treatment of Gallbladder Carcinoma. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Approach
    Sucandy, Iswanto
    Jabbar, Furrukh
    Syblis, Cameron
    Crespo, Kaitlyn
    Ross, Sharona
    Rosemurgy, Alexander
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2022, 88 (03) : 348 - 351
  • [10] Minimally invasive adrenalectomy: a cohort study of surgical approach and outcomes
    Birtwistle, Lucy
    Leong, David
    Aniss, Ahmad
    Glover, Anthony
    Sidhu, Stan
    Papachristos, Alexander
    Sywak, Mark
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 93 (09) : 2222 - 2228