Comparisons of biophysical properties and bioactivities of mono-PEGylated endostatin and an endostatin analog

被引:2
|
作者
Wang, Shan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fu, Yan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Luo, Yongzhang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Life Sci, Natl Engn Lab Antitumor Prot Therapeut, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Beijing Key Lab Prot Therapeut, Sch Life Sci, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Life Sci, Canc Biol Lab, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
关键词
Endostatin; PEGylation; Antiangiogenic therapy; Drug design; Zinc-binding protein-endostatin; RECOMBINANT HUMAN ENDOSTATIN; ANTITUMOR-ACTIVITY; DOUBLE-BLIND; STABILITY; MULTICENTER; TRIAL; M2ES;
D O I
10.1186/s40880-016-0080-8
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Endostatin (ES) is a well-established potent endogenous antiangiogenic factor. An ES variant, called zinc-binding protein-ES (ZBP-ES), is clinically available; however, its use is limited by rapid renal clearance and short residence time. PEGylation has been exploited to overcome these shortcomings, and mono-PEGylated ES (called M2ES) as well as mono-PEGylated ZBP-ES (MZBP-ES) are developed in our study. This study aimed to compare the biophysical properties and biological effects of M2ES and MZBP-ES to evaluate their druggability. Methods: Circular dichroism and tryptophan emission fluorescence were used to monitor the conformational changes of M2ES and MZBP-ES. Their resistance to trypsin digestion and guanidinium chloride (GdmCl)-induced unfolding was examined by Coomassie staining and tryptophan emission fluorescence, respectively. The biological effects of M2ES and MZBP-ES on endothelial cell migration were evaluated using Transwell migration and wound healing assays, and the uptake of M2ES and MZBP-ES in endothelial cells was also compared by Western blotting and immunofluorescence. Results: Structural analyses revealed that M2ES has a more compact tertiary structure than MZBP-ES. Moreover, M2ES was more resistant to trypsin digestion and GdmCl-induced unfolding compared with MZBP-ES. In addition, although M2ES and MZBP-ES showed comparable levels of inhibiting transwell migration and wound healing of endothelial cells, M2ES displayed an increased ability to enter cells compared with MZBP-ES, possibly caused by the enhanced interaction with nucleolin. Conclusions: M2ES has a more compact tertiary structure, is more stable for trypsin digestion and GdmCl-induced unfolding, exhibits increased cellular uptake and shows equivalent inhibitory effects on cell migration relative to MZBP-ES, indicating that M2ES is a more promising candidate for anticancer drug development compared with MZBP-ES.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] Comparisons of biophysical properties and bioactivities of mono-PEGylated endostatin and an endostatin analog
    Shan Wang
    Yan Fu
    Yongzhang Luo
    Chinese Journal of Cancer, 2016, 35 (02) : 92 - 99
  • [2] Preparation and stability of N-terminal mono-PEGylated recombinant human endostatin
    Nie, Yongjun
    Zhang, Xin
    Wang, Xinchang
    Chen, Junhui
    BIOCONJUGATE CHEMISTRY, 2006, 17 (04) : 995 - 999
  • [3] Biophysical and biological characterization of PEGylated recombinant human endostatin
    Guo, Lifang
    Xu, Benshan
    Zhou, Daifu
    Chang, Guodong
    Fu, Yan
    Liu, Lihong
    Luo, Yongzhang
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PHARMACOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 46 (10) : 920 - 927
  • [4] A long-acting, mono-PEGylated human growth hormone analog is a potent stimulator of weight gain and bone growth in hypophysectomized rats
    Cox, George N.
    Rosendahl, Mary S.
    Chlipala, Elizabeth A.
    Smith, Darin J.
    Carlson, Sharon J.
    Doherty, Daniel H.
    ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2007, 148 (04) : 1590 - 1597
  • [5] Efficacy, safety and tolerance of PEG-ENDO (an N-terminal mono-PEGylated recombinant human endostatin) with TC regimen (paclitaxel/carboplatin) therapy in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a single-center, open trial phase I study
    Ma, Lie
    Meng, Jiguang
    Liu, Zhenqian
    Li, Yongqun
    Zhang, Yan
    Han, Zhihai
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 9 (10): : 19988 - 19994