Image theory in contemporary political psychology

被引:0
作者
Lasticova, Barbara [1 ]
Misik, Matus [2 ]
机构
[1] Ustav Vyskumu Socialnej Komunikacie SAV, Dubravska Cesta 9, Bratislava 84104, Slovakia
[2] Charles Univ Prague, Filozof Fak, Katedra Politol, Bratislava, Slovakia
来源
CESKOSLOVENSKA PSYCHOLOGIE | 2016年 / 60卷 / 02期
关键词
international image theory; stereotypes; political psychology; intergroup relations; EU; refugees; INTERGROUP CONTACT; UNITED-STATES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The aim of this paper is to present international image theory (IIT) that is unknown in Czech and Slovak psychology. This theory is used in political psychology to investigate intergroup stereotypes in the international arena. It is argued that the IIT provides an integrative framework for stereotype content research in the international arena, anchored in particular political and cultural context. The first part of the paper presents the historical background of the theory and offers a synthetic definition of five main images enemy, ally, barbarian, imperialist and dependent based on critical analysis of existing literature. The second part focuses on image theory limitations, especially as far as the operationalization of images and the theory use outside of the context of international relations are concerned. The third part outlines perspectives for further research and practical implications of image theory, mainly for political communication, international conflicts and crises resolution and relations between ethnic groups.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 224
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Considering love: Implications for critical political psychology [J].
Malherbe, Nick .
NEW IDEAS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 61
[32]   Hybrid war: Russian contemporary political warfare [J].
Chivvis, Christopher S. .
BULLETIN OF THE ATOMIC SCIENTISTS, 2017, 73 (05) :316-321
[33]   Image in politics and political science [J].
Neymatova, A. Y. .
MGIMO REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, 2011, (02) :268-274
[34]   Rallies and the "First Image" Leadership Psychology, Scapegoating Proclivity, and the Diversionary Use of Force [J].
Foster, Dennis M. ;
Keller, Jonathan W. .
CONFLICT MANAGEMENT AND PEACE SCIENCE, 2010, 27 (05) :417-441
[35]   The political psychology of participation in Turkey: civic engagement, basic values, political sophistication and the young [J].
Chrona, Stavroula ;
Capelos, Tereza .
SOUTHEAST EUROPEAN AND BLACK SEA STUDIES, 2017, 17 (01) :77-95
[36]   The Political Psychology of Social Classes in Brazil: Attributes of Political Attitudes by Stratification and Social Mobility [J].
Renno, Lucio ;
Turgeon, Mathieu .
DADOS-REVISTA DE CIENCIAS SOCIAIS, 2016, 59 (01) :11-51
[37]   Relationship Issues between Rational Choice and Political Psychology [J].
Marx, Johannes ;
Tiefensee, Christine .
POLITISCHE VIERTELJAHRESSCHRIFT, 2015, :506-+
[38]   Contemporary state of contact hypothesis in social psychology .2. [J].
Hrcka, M .
CESKOSLOVENSKA PSYCHOLOGIE, 1997, 41 (03) :225-234
[39]   The Responsibilization of Refugees in the United States: On the Political Uses of Psychology [J].
Uehling, Greta .
ANTHROPOLOGICAL QUARTERLY, 2015, 88 (04) :997-1028
[40]   Political Psychology: Contributions to Costa Rican Human Rights [J].
Gonzalez Suarez, Mirta .
REVISTA COSTARRICENSE DE PSICOLOGIA, 2012, 31 (1-2) :165-189