Comparison of ultrasound and tumor marker CA125 in diagnosis of adnexal mass malignancies

被引:2
作者
Behnamfar, Fariba [1 ]
Esmaeilian, Fatemeh [1 ]
Adibi, Atoosa [2 ]
Rouholamin, Safoura [1 ]
机构
[1] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Esfahan, Iran
[2] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Dept Radiol, Esfahan, Iran
来源
ADVANCED BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH | 2022年 / 11卷 / 01期
关键词
Ovarian Cancer; Malignancies; tumor marker CA125; ultrasound; OVARIAN-CANCER; RISK;
D O I
10.4103/abr.abr_164_20
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: CA125 is the most used tumor marker for ovarian cancer monitoring and diagnosis. This study aimed to evaluate the capacity to predict malignancy in women with adnexal tumors using CA125 measurement and ultrasound criteria before the pathological examination. Materials and Methods: This observational diagnostic study was conducted on 300 patients with obvious diagnosis of adnexal mass consists of ovarian masses, fallopian tubes, and masses within the broad ligament referring to Alzahra and Beheshti Hospitals from 2018 to 2019. Ultrasound examinations were done before surgery and malignancy risk was investigated by the ADNEX criterion. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio (likelihood ratio [LR]+ and LR-), and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated. Results: From 284 patients, 260 masses were categorized in benign, 18 were in borderline, and 18 masses were malignant. The mean age of patients with malignant tumors was significantly higher than the others (P = 0.01). Differences in the level of CA-125 were not statistically significant (P = 0.78). Furthermore, the proportion of ascites in the malignant group (16.3%) was significantly higher than the others (P = 0.003). The AUC in ADNEX model (cutoff & GE;9%) for differentiation of benign and malignant tumors was 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69-0.80) with a sensitivity of 0.63 (95% CI: 0.41-0.81) and a specificity of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.74-0.84). Receiver operating characteristic analysis for CA-125 revealed that this variable is not capable for discrimination between benign and malignant tumors as the AUCs of the aforementioned variable were 0.60, 0.60, and 0.52 for the whole patients, premenopause, and postmenopause categories. Conclusion: CA-125 marker, along with other ultrasound findings, can be more accurate in identifying the malignancy of the adnexa tumor.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Diagnostic Value of Transvaginal Sonograph (TVS), Color Doppler, and Serum Tumor Marker CA125, CEA, and AFP in Ovarian Cancer
    Fang Zhang
    Zhou-long Zhang
    [J]. Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, 2015, 72 : 353 - 357
  • [42] The Diagnostic Value of Transvaginal Sonograph (TVS), Color Doppler, and Serum Tumor Marker CA125, CEA, and AFP in Ovarian Cancer
    Zhang, Fang
    Zhang, Zhou-long
    [J]. CELL BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS, 2015, 72 (02) : 353 - 357
  • [43] Efficacy of IOTA simple rules, O-RADS, and CA125 to distinguish benign and malignant adnexal masses
    Xie, Wen Ting
    Wang, Yao Qin
    Xiang, Zhi Sheng
    Du, Zhong Shi
    Huang, Shi Xin
    Chen, Yi Jie
    Tang, Li Na
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OVARIAN RESEARCH, 2022, 15 (01)
  • [44] Serum peptide/protein profiling by mass spectrometry provides diagnostic information independently of CA125 in women with an ovarian tumor
    Callesen, Anne K.
    Madsen, Jonna S.
    Iachina, Maria
    Vach, Werner
    Kruse, Torben A.
    Jensen, Ole N.
    Mogensen, Ole
    [J]. CANCER BIOMARKERS, 2010, 6 (02) : 73 - 82
  • [45] No benefit from combining HE4 and CA125 as ovarian tumor markers in a clinical setting
    Jacob, Francis
    Meier, Mara
    Caduff, Rosmarie
    Goldstein, Darlene
    Pochechueva, Tatiana
    Hacker, Neville
    Fink, Daniel
    Heinzelmann-Schwarz, Viola
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 121 (03) : 487 - 491
  • [46] Predictors of pretreatment CA125 at ovarian cancer diagnosis: a pooled analysis in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium
    Babic, Ana
    Cramer, Daniel W.
    Kelemen, Linda E.
    Kobel, Martin
    Steed, Helen
    Webb, Penelope M.
    Johnatty, Sharon E.
    deFazio, Anna
    Lambrechts, Diether
    Goodman, Marc T.
    Heitz, Florian
    Matsuo, Keitaro
    Hosono, Satoyo
    Karlan, Beth Y.
    Jensen, Allan
    Kjaer, Susanne K.
    Goode, Ellen L.
    Pejovic, Tanja
    Moffitt, Melissa
    Hogdall, Estrid
    Hogdall, Claus
    McNeish, Iain
    Terry, Kathryn L.
    [J]. CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2017, 28 (05) : 459 - 468
  • [47] Diagnostic utility of the tumor marker CA 125 in cervical and uterine disease
    de González, AGS
    de Huaman, MR
    López, S
    Martínez, MF
    Guber, RS
    Frascarolo, MJ
    de Martínez, NR
    [J]. ACTA BIOQUIMICA CLINICA LATINOAMERICANA, 2003, 37 (01): : 39 - 46
  • [48] Comparison of differences between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and conventional chemotherapy for ovarian cancer in application, CA125 and prognosis
    Zuo, Ying
    You, Dong
    Liu, Jianhui
    Ren, Ruizhen
    Li, Ling
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2018, 11 (05): : 4991 - 4997
  • [49] The mathematical models of serum HE4 and CA125 combined application to improve the pelvic tumor differential diagnosis rate
    Tian, Yaping
    Wang, Chuanxin
    Cheng, Liming
    Zhang, Peng
    Guo, Lin
    Li, Wanli
    Zhang, Zhongying
    Huang, Yanchun
    Ou, Qishui
    Wen, Xinyu
    Xing, Yuelei
    Zheng, Guixi
    Sun, Ziyong
    Li, Huijun
    Zhang, Aimin
    Chen, Ying
    Liu, Wen
    Ye, Huiming
    Xu, Yi
    Huo, Yishan
    Chen, Jing
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS IWBBIO 2014: INTERNATIONAL WORK-CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2014, : 109 - 115
  • [50] MUC16 (CA125): tumor biomarker to cancer therapy, a work in progress
    Felder, Mildred
    Kapur, Arvinder
    Gonzalez-Bosquet, Jesus
    Horibata, Sachi
    Heintz, Joseph
    Albrecht, Ralph
    Fass, Lucas
    Kaur, Justanjyot
    Hu, Kevin
    Shojaei, Hadi
    Whelan, Rebecca J.
    Patankar, Manish S.
    [J]. MOLECULAR CANCER, 2014, 13